Jules
@adjulesting.bsky.social
they/them, 26, neurodivergent, green party england & wales, free Palestine.
we skipped 68 entirely, so 9 is safe
December 13, 2025 at 1:09 PM
we skipped 68 entirely, so 9 is safe
holy shit leave some rewards for the rest of them lol
December 12, 2025 at 10:45 AM
holy shit leave some rewards for the rest of them lol
i looked up how much 50 cc's would be and it's way more than anyone would ever need (at once) of girl goo (for enanthate anyhow) bc it's literally the same as ml.
December 8, 2025 at 11:30 AM
i looked up how much 50 cc's would be and it's way more than anyone would ever need (at once) of girl goo (for enanthate anyhow) bc it's literally the same as ml.
i am not worthy of shadow the hedgehog profile picture
December 8, 2025 at 1:32 AM
i am not worthy of shadow the hedgehog profile picture
if i may
- sand hill zone (green hill’s looking a lot more like sand hill right now)
- super green hill zone
- westopolis (shadow the hedgehog green hill zone)
- dark green hill zone
- neo mecha green hill zone
- future green hill zone
- past green hill zone
- present day green hill zone
- sand hill zone (green hill’s looking a lot more like sand hill right now)
- super green hill zone
- westopolis (shadow the hedgehog green hill zone)
- dark green hill zone
- neo mecha green hill zone
- future green hill zone
- past green hill zone
- present day green hill zone
December 8, 2025 at 1:29 AM
if i may
- sand hill zone (green hill’s looking a lot more like sand hill right now)
- super green hill zone
- westopolis (shadow the hedgehog green hill zone)
- dark green hill zone
- neo mecha green hill zone
- future green hill zone
- past green hill zone
- present day green hill zone
- sand hill zone (green hill’s looking a lot more like sand hill right now)
- super green hill zone
- westopolis (shadow the hedgehog green hill zone)
- dark green hill zone
- neo mecha green hill zone
- future green hill zone
- past green hill zone
- present day green hill zone
If certainty is your criteria for being "one up," then sure, you do you.
December 7, 2025 at 4:42 PM
If certainty is your criteria for being "one up," then sure, you do you.
Oh be for real lmao. Please.
Yeah, some words are closely associated with Marxist analysis. And? Great deal of difference between that and “never seen a single use of the term but by Marxists”
I don’t feel confident enough in my understanding of Marx’s work to say that I am, or am not a Marxist.
Yeah, some words are closely associated with Marxist analysis. And? Great deal of difference between that and “never seen a single use of the term but by Marxists”
I don’t feel confident enough in my understanding of Marx’s work to say that I am, or am not a Marxist.
December 7, 2025 at 4:22 PM
Oh be for real lmao. Please.
Yeah, some words are closely associated with Marxist analysis. And? Great deal of difference between that and “never seen a single use of the term but by Marxists”
I don’t feel confident enough in my understanding of Marx’s work to say that I am, or am not a Marxist.
Yeah, some words are closely associated with Marxist analysis. And? Great deal of difference between that and “never seen a single use of the term but by Marxists”
I don’t feel confident enough in my understanding of Marx’s work to say that I am, or am not a Marxist.
and? we both know, i hope, that is not a valid argument.
December 7, 2025 at 4:04 PM
and? we both know, i hope, that is not a valid argument.
That is simply factually untrue.
December 7, 2025 at 3:47 PM
That is simply factually untrue.
Well, yeah of course. Not arguing otherwise.
December 7, 2025 at 3:46 PM
Well, yeah of course. Not arguing otherwise.
not necessarily. it existed before Marx and simply refers to something being dominant. it is associated with Marxism, much like capitalism, socialism, exploitation, are terms associated with Marxism but not necessarily Marxist exclusive terminology lol.
December 7, 2025 at 3:31 PM
not necessarily. it existed before Marx and simply refers to something being dominant. it is associated with Marxism, much like capitalism, socialism, exploitation, are terms associated with Marxism but not necessarily Marxist exclusive terminology lol.
lol what? care to elucidate?
December 7, 2025 at 2:06 PM
lol what? care to elucidate?
Society wouldn't exist at all were it not for "human nature."
Pretending to understand the complexity of "human nature," assuming there is one general human nature we're all subject to, one that conveniently explains and renders unsolvable our problems, sounds more like a delusion to me.
Pretending to understand the complexity of "human nature," assuming there is one general human nature we're all subject to, one that conveniently explains and renders unsolvable our problems, sounds more like a delusion to me.
December 7, 2025 at 1:55 PM
Society wouldn't exist at all were it not for "human nature."
Pretending to understand the complexity of "human nature," assuming there is one general human nature we're all subject to, one that conveniently explains and renders unsolvable our problems, sounds more like a delusion to me.
Pretending to understand the complexity of "human nature," assuming there is one general human nature we're all subject to, one that conveniently explains and renders unsolvable our problems, sounds more like a delusion to me.
Every state relies or benefits from, to varying degrees, exploitation because it's inherent to capitalism, the hegemonic economic system. It is not possible for any state to fit your criteria under a hegemonic capitalism.
December 7, 2025 at 1:45 PM
Every state relies or benefits from, to varying degrees, exploitation because it's inherent to capitalism, the hegemonic economic system. It is not possible for any state to fit your criteria under a hegemonic capitalism.
Well yeah, because what you perceive makes someone Green is subjective and your view seems very all or nothing.
Our over-consumption and environmental turmoil isn't a product of individual attitudes or some kind of inherent "humanity" we all share. It's systemic. Driven by uninhibited corporations.
Our over-consumption and environmental turmoil isn't a product of individual attitudes or some kind of inherent "humanity" we all share. It's systemic. Driven by uninhibited corporations.
December 7, 2025 at 1:26 PM
Well yeah, because what you perceive makes someone Green is subjective and your view seems very all or nothing.
Our over-consumption and environmental turmoil isn't a product of individual attitudes or some kind of inherent "humanity" we all share. It's systemic. Driven by uninhibited corporations.
Our over-consumption and environmental turmoil isn't a product of individual attitudes or some kind of inherent "humanity" we all share. It's systemic. Driven by uninhibited corporations.
Shame.
I'd say you don't need to hold your breath at all. Already plenty of states doing that. Depends what you define as unconventional, I guess.
I'd say you don't need to hold your breath at all. Already plenty of states doing that. Depends what you define as unconventional, I guess.
December 7, 2025 at 1:19 PM
Shame.
I'd say you don't need to hold your breath at all. Already plenty of states doing that. Depends what you define as unconventional, I guess.
I'd say you don't need to hold your breath at all. Already plenty of states doing that. Depends what you define as unconventional, I guess.
It sounds like you have a very all or nothing attitude towards what qualifies an individual as Green or not. No one is or can be expected to be perfectly Green.
Even if more people were individually, perfectly, Green it wouldn't matter much. Corporations are the real driving force of disaster.
Even if more people were individually, perfectly, Green it wouldn't matter much. Corporations are the real driving force of disaster.
December 7, 2025 at 1:16 PM
It sounds like you have a very all or nothing attitude towards what qualifies an individual as Green or not. No one is or can be expected to be perfectly Green.
Even if more people were individually, perfectly, Green it wouldn't matter much. Corporations are the real driving force of disaster.
Even if more people were individually, perfectly, Green it wouldn't matter much. Corporations are the real driving force of disaster.
Me neither. Under Reform it certainly will try to do that, the Greens? Don't think so.
As for currency collapse, no of course no one is helped by that. But you're making some assertions/determinations about outcomes/certainties I don't agree with. I don't really know how we got from A to B there.
As for currency collapse, no of course no one is helped by that. But you're making some assertions/determinations about outcomes/certainties I don't agree with. I don't really know how we got from A to B there.
December 7, 2025 at 1:08 PM
Me neither. Under Reform it certainly will try to do that, the Greens? Don't think so.
As for currency collapse, no of course no one is helped by that. But you're making some assertions/determinations about outcomes/certainties I don't agree with. I don't really know how we got from A to B there.
As for currency collapse, no of course no one is helped by that. But you're making some assertions/determinations about outcomes/certainties I don't agree with. I don't really know how we got from A to B there.
Well that would be a point towards you being Green, just as being vegan is a point toward Polanski being Green, in my view.
December 7, 2025 at 1:00 PM
Well that would be a point towards you being Green, just as being vegan is a point toward Polanski being Green, in my view.
So in your view, I imagine it's a matter of how fast you want it destroyed. That's a bit black and white for me.
Yes, the definition of impossible is something that can't be done. The point I was getting at, is that there are/were many things that were considered impossible, until they were done.
Yes, the definition of impossible is something that can't be done. The point I was getting at, is that there are/were many things that were considered impossible, until they were done.
December 7, 2025 at 12:55 PM
So in your view, I imagine it's a matter of how fast you want it destroyed. That's a bit black and white for me.
Yes, the definition of impossible is something that can't be done. The point I was getting at, is that there are/were many things that were considered impossible, until they were done.
Yes, the definition of impossible is something that can't be done. The point I was getting at, is that there are/were many things that were considered impossible, until they were done.