I am not the brains behind this operation. This one is @ctfitzpatrick.bsky.social and Bob Corn-Revere and Greg Greubel.

feels like a line accidentally left out of The Boys Are Back In Town

We represent her.

This lawsuit was a copycat of the two still-pending lawsuits filed by Trump against Selzer. (Yes, two.) Those suits remain pending for now.

Wrong still in Velcro

BREAKING: Charges against Larry Bushart over a meme quoting President Trump have been dropped: www.wkrn.com/news/charges...

The Sheriff sits down in his office for an interview to argue that he *had* to arrest Larry Bushart for posting a meme quoting President Trump. www.newschannel5.com/news/newscha...

The Sheriff's story about the arrest of Larry Bushart over a Trump/Kirk meme continues to fall apart.

Sheriff claims the arrest was necessary because Bushart refused to "clarify" to local police that his meme wasn't a threat. The police department says that's not true.

www.wkrn.com/news/local-n...

I mean... decent chance it is.

Now the City of Fairhope's City Council President defends the arrest and encourages prosecution. Says Jack Burrell: "We want to make sure we don’t violate someone’s constitutional rights, and I hope the police have enough evidence that they stand behind the charges."

www.al.com/news/2025/10...

DHS posts photos of someone in a similar costume. It's not obscenity.

If you have a police officer going around telling people to remove costumes he thinks are offensive, you have speech police. And the department and city officials are defending it! www.al.com/news/2025/10...

They have little incentive to learn why they are wrong. Immunity upon immunity makes it difficult to hold officials/officers accountable, and they will be indemnified by public funds or insurance as a backstop. And elected officials rarely face consequences: it is popular to censor unpopular speech.

A common theme of the First Amendment is local officials and police arresting people for speech, then trying to stretch narrowly-defined exceptions (it’s “obscene” or a “threat”) to the First Amendment to justify their actions.