adamlavecchia.bsky.social
adamlavecchia.bsky.social
@adamlavecchia.bsky.social
[6/6] ...among others. This would be a better way to help Canadian firms raise the capital they need and would be more efficient than the proposed TFSA limit increase.
April 5, 2025 at 4:50 PM
[5/6] If policy makers want to attract investment capital to Canada (a good idea IMO), then they should enact policy to encourage investors from all over the world (including Canada) to invest here. This includes reducing corporate tax rates, streamlining regulations affecting big capital projects,
April 5, 2025 at 4:50 PM
[4/6] To the extent that TFSA contributions come from funds "repurposed" from elsewhere, they *will not* represent new capital for firms to use/invest. Second, giving preferential treatment to assets invested in different countries (in this case CAD) leads to an inefficient allocation of capital.
April 5, 2025 at 4:50 PM
[3/6] ...to the Canadian asset preference/requirement (i.e. sell a Canadian fund in your taxable account and rebuy the same fund in a TFSA). My own work suggests 25-45% of new TFSA balances are financed by reducing savings in taxable financial assets (onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10....).
Family‐level responses to the introduction of Tax‐Free Savings Accounts
This paper presents evidence on the effect of the introduction of Canadian Tax-Free Savings Accounts (TFSAs) on the savings of families with children. Contributions to TFSAs are not tax-deductible bu...
onlinelibrary.wiley.com
April 5, 2025 at 4:50 PM
[2/6] First, there is the issue of how the new TFSA contributions are financed. TFSA contributions financed by transferring assets from taxable or tax-deferred (RRSP) accounts or contributions that would have been saved in another form anyway *do not* represent new savings. This also applies...
April 5, 2025 at 4:50 PM