Adam Altmejd
adamaltmejd.se
Adam Altmejd
@adamaltmejd.se
Applied microeconomist at @sofi.su.se and IFFS working on inequality, education, and health. Affiliate @iza.org, CESifo.
Stort grattis!!
February 1, 2025 at 8:51 AM
Bookmarking :)
December 8, 2024 at 9:30 PM
Tried it for the the first time a few weeks ago. The speed, clean syntax, ability to typeset tables directly from csvs, don’t think I’ll be able to go back.
December 3, 2024 at 9:19 PM
Jag fattar verkligen inte. Han pratar om hur AI ska hitta cancer men nuvarande lagrum tillåter redan forskare att samla in data på hela befolkningen från en massa olika myndigheter, träna en AI-modell och sen publicera så vårdpersonal kan använda den.
December 2, 2024 at 2:52 PM
That was fun. R-datatable is a bit more concise :).
December 2, 2024 at 1:12 PM
Was really surprised by that framing. Isn’t 60-77 a really narrow range given the plurality of both opinions and methods?
November 27, 2024 at 7:03 AM
Ooh thank you!
November 25, 2024 at 8:36 PM
Was just gonna say the same, Dutch data is a mark of quality!
February 8, 2024 at 3:52 PM
How do I sign?
November 14, 2023 at 3:24 PM
🔗 [8/8] This study is part of our COVID-19 research program SWECOV (see swecov.se). For a more in-depth understanding, I invite you to read our full article: www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/.... And please do share your comments and thoughts!
PNAS
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS), a peer reviewed journal of the National Academy of Sciences (NAS) - an authoritative source of high-impact, original research that broadly spans...
www.pnas.org
November 10, 2023 at 9:27 AM
🤝 [7/8] By taking a bird's-eye view and applying uniform methods to gauge the many dimensions of inequality, our study provides fresh perspectives that complement the many specialized studies on the pandemic's impact.
November 10, 2023 at 9:27 AM
🔎 [6/8] This strong persistence surprised us. It suggests a structure of inequality so rigid that even a global, unexpected, crisis leaves it unaltered. These findings underscore the need for pandemic policies to take inequality seriously.
November 10, 2023 at 9:27 AM
📉 [5/8] (2) Interestingly, the pandemic didn't significantly reshape the structure of social inequalities. The relative positions of different social groups remained strikingly consistent with pre-pandemic patterns. For 2020, only 2/72 markers fall outside the 10%-change cone!
November 10, 2023 at 9:27 AM
🌍 [4/8] Our paper reports two central findings: (1) Disadvantaged groups—those with lower incomes, education, and non-European immigrants—suffered more, both from COVID-19 and from wider health issues and economic strain. The graph reports risks relative to the population mean.
November 10, 2023 at 9:26 AM
📈 [3/8] Life during the pandemic got worse in almost every way. We observed an overall increase in negative events, deviating from pre-pandemic trends. This uptick underscores the pandemic's sweeping impact on societal wellbeing.
November 10, 2023 at 9:26 AM