Reciprocity should draw enough attention that it gets eliminated.

This can’t be the standard. Reciprocity would create massive outrage. Think about that.

Don’t believe what you see or hear from those around you…

“The fringe” now controls the CDC and NIH and is spreading dangerous and misleading information under the government’s authority.

AI slop for dealflow. Interesting.

Science shouldn’t be a debate. Debates are often won not based on facts but based on better strategic argument. Science should be based on evidence and we should constantly be challenging that evidence with more evidence. Scientific method requires discipline and data.

This is a waste of time and money. The only thing that makes sense is attention seeking.

That’s not how appropriations work.

This is a thread worth reading 2x. CISA is critical as a sentinel. Danger ahead.

Letitia Jame’s sounds like an awesome great aunt. Pretty obvious this is going to be a gigantic waste of taxpayer money.

Honestly…this is super weird.

Because science is about announcing conclusions and then going to “make the proof”.

Fake images? Fake witnesses? We are in dark times.

Too many “google scientists”weighing in on public health policy.

Under what legal theory would those suing have standing as an injured party?