We also find interesting heterogeneity by WFH type and occupation potential.
See the paper for more detail: docs.iza.org/dp17468.pdf
We also find interesting heterogeneity by WFH type and occupation potential.
See the paper for more detail: docs.iza.org/dp17468.pdf
No evidence of low-trust areas “catching up”—trust reinforced WFH, especially in mid-remote roles and for managers.
No evidence of low-trust areas “catching up”—trust reinforced WFH, especially in mid-remote roles and for managers.
Our key trust measure—managers believe “people are fair”— predicts WFH better than institutional trust metrics.
Our key trust measure—managers believe “people are fair”— predicts WFH better than institutional trust metrics.
Prediction: Firms should only offer WFH in settings where there is high aggregate trust, since unilateral deviation will only attract shirkers.
Prediction: Firms should only offer WFH in settings where there is high aggregate trust, since unilateral deviation will only attract shirkers.
The data shows that higher managerial trust (belief that “most people are fair”) links to higher WFH rates pre-pandemic (2019) and greater WFH growth (2019–2021).
The data shows that higher managerial trust (belief that “most people are fair”) links to higher WFH rates pre-pandemic (2019) and greater WFH growth (2019–2021).
Managerial trust strongly correlates with WFH. Places where managers believe people are trustworthy had higher WFH rates pre- and mid-pandemic—even when controlling for occupations, demographics, digital skills, & GDP.
More below 👇
Managerial trust strongly correlates with WFH. Places where managers believe people are trustworthy had higher WFH rates pre- and mid-pandemic—even when controlling for occupations, demographics, digital skills, & GDP.
More below 👇