Impact litigation = a way for a relatively small number of lawyers to make systemic changes through the courts. However, jobs are competitive and hard to find. This panel will explore the many forms that impact litigation can take, and how to break into impact litigation as a career. Register here⬇️

Register here: getinvolved.acslaw.org/component/ev...

In our system of government, opposition—even vehement, angry opposition—to political leaders is not treason.

Read the full reflection from Geremy C. Kamens, the Federal Public Defender who argued the case ⤵️
www.acslaw.org/expertforum/...

That instruction upheld a key principle from Brandenburg v. Ohio:
Speech can only be punished when it is directed and likely to produce imminent lawless action.

“Mere advocacy,” however offensive, remains protected.

Interested in more ACS programming? Check out our recent event DEI and the First Amendment: www.acslaw.org/video/dei-an...

Judge Anthony Trenga instructed the jury that “speech that merely, without more, encourages or advocates that others should engage in violence—even against political figures—at some indefinite point in the future” is protected by the First Amendment.

The case (United States v. Stinson) asked whether words alone—statements encouraging violence without any concrete plan, payment, or coordination—can amount to criminal solicitation under federal law.