Even if someone was colorblind enough to not be able to discern which was green and which was red, the color-key solves that issue.

No need to be in graphics design; the willingness to listen and adapt is more than enough! There are AAA game studios who fail miserably with colorblind accessibility.

This is so much clearer, thank you! The darker shade of red helps a lot for me at least (colorblind people tend to rely on differences in shade to tell color when they can't tell the difference in tone).

for the next one, would you consider making them more saturated/vibrant, making one significantly darker than the other, switching one of them to blue, and/or including a highlight in the key? Implementing any of those suggestions would really help us colorblind folks out! (2/2)

thanks so much for this!

just one lil thing: I'm a tad colorblind and find it very difficult to tell the difference between the red and green shades you've picked. (1/2)

Welp, nevermind, watched the video on Yostar and the subtitles say "ash and memory"—I'm still inclined to trust the singer though, so "etched in memory" it is!

Plus, Yostar's track record isn't exactly flawless. There's another reason why "etched" makes sense, but that's spoiler territory.

Well whaddya know, it's indeed right there (though just not closed captions). I didn't think to look there because I've been referencing the MSR account and website.

Not sure why it was wrong on the wiki for years, but that makes my job a lot easier—thanks!

Thank you so much!

Well, apologies then because that was not my intent at all.

:/

I was only supporting the original counterclaim because it made sense to me.

My bad, forgot IQ scores are distributed normally; that's all you needed to say. I stand corrected. Though if you'd clarified that rather than just saying "you don't know how IQ scores work" we probably wouldn't even be having this conversation. 😅

5/6, or ~83%, of the the numbers in the dataset are below 80.

On the other hand, we all knew what was colloquially meant by "half of people are below average intelligence".

I'd also argue that "average intelligence" is a more useful metric anyway, but that's besides the point.

(2/2)

No, they're correct. Half of people would be below the median IQ (and obviously above as well) because that is the middle of the dataset.

Example with silly numbers: 10, 20, 40, 50, 60, 220. The median is 45. The average is 80.

3/6, or 50%, of the numbers in the dataset are below 45.

(1/2)

fair. for myself, limited government had more to do with keeping/refining safety regulations and the like within reason. the government is notoriously slow after all. obviously whatever is "unnecessary" and what's "reasonable" is always up for debate

i mean, its not like they dont exist, more like the term i personally associated with them turned out to mean something else entirely to others. maybe i was wrong from the start and "libertarian" always referred to folks who espoused "no government" rather than "limited government"...

as someone who (formerly) called myself libertarian, i am saddened that the term is associated with anarcho-capitalists rather than the meaning i originally thought it had held years ago

just because someone doesn't like either party or is "neutral" doesn't mean they didn't vote