@abyrdinthehand.bsky.social
Reposted
Gavin Newsom is a slick-talking rich transphobic cop-loving dishonest opportunist. He takes his marching orders from billionaires.
Newsom is a phony. I think most Americans can see right through him.
I don't think he stands a chance in the general. He's Joe Lieberman with better hair.
Newsom is a phony. I think most Americans can see right through him.
I don't think he stands a chance in the general. He's Joe Lieberman with better hair.
January 16, 2026 at 5:53 AM
Gavin Newsom is a slick-talking rich transphobic cop-loving dishonest opportunist. He takes his marching orders from billionaires.
Newsom is a phony. I think most Americans can see right through him.
I don't think he stands a chance in the general. He's Joe Lieberman with better hair.
Newsom is a phony. I think most Americans can see right through him.
I don't think he stands a chance in the general. He's Joe Lieberman with better hair.
Reposted
Gavin Newsom spent the last 7 years doing the bidding of big tech. You can blame him for many of the harms we're now suffering. We have spent the last 7 years trying to keep our unhoused neighbors alive despite Newsom's best efforts to make more people homeless while he and his friends get richer.
January 16, 2026 at 5:44 AM
Gavin Newsom spent the last 7 years doing the bidding of big tech. You can blame him for many of the harms we're now suffering. We have spent the last 7 years trying to keep our unhoused neighbors alive despite Newsom's best efforts to make more people homeless while he and his friends get richer.
Reposted
“Huge internal concern” among CBS staff over that “internal bleeding” story.
www.theguardian.com/media/2026/j...
www.theguardian.com/media/2026/j...
![The network’s top editor, Bari Weiss, expressed a high level of interest in the story on an editorial call Wednesday morning, according to staffers who listened.
“There was big internal dissension about the ‘internal bleeding’ report here last night,” the CBS News staffer, who was not authorized to speak publicly, said . “It was viewed as a thinly-veiled, anonymous leak by [the Trump administration] to someone who’d carry it online.”
“Felt to many here like we were carrying water for the admin’s justifying of the shooting to keep our access to our sources,” said a second network staffer, who was also not authorized to comment.
In a statement, a CBS News sp](https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_thumbnail/plain/did:plc:svawqo4jxobyyuqmixplvcux/bafkreigvikvydve32ejzqe7ijwv3vlp5mxxpltxkp4diooisa75bzkcbju@jpeg)
January 16, 2026 at 3:07 AM
“Huge internal concern” among CBS staff over that “internal bleeding” story.
www.theguardian.com/media/2026/j...
www.theguardian.com/media/2026/j...
Reposted
was in a meeting recently and someone pitched making trailers with AI for a book and I cut them off and said absolutely not and they dropped it. not hard! do not use the tools of the enemy!
January 16, 2026 at 4:12 AM
was in a meeting recently and someone pitched making trailers with AI for a book and I cut them off and said absolutely not and they dropped it. not hard! do not use the tools of the enemy!