Trade my deepest convictions for a freshly-baked challah

It’s especially glaring compared to “brainwashing” claims employed against communist or terrorist recruitment, which was used to simultaneously overshadow those movements’ political salience and justify societal and governmental trampling of free expression and association

If you’re a local attorney running your own firm, maybe you’re not used to dealing with reporters. But an official with media training and surrounded by communications folks really should know better.

The disclaimer is also off-base because Johnson’s line isn’t a random, unsupported assertion: it’s a well-trodden weaponized narrative. It’s unsupported because the line is not designed to be persuade: Johnson and others are seeking amplification.

Genuinely one of the more realistic reporter-source interactions I’ve seen in media

Couldn't this simply represent market saturation? Given the frenzy of larger firms to jump into adoption earlier on, it wouldn't surprise me if there aren't many bigger players left who aren't already in the pool

✋

Is he paid by the syllable?

Especially her decision-making under pressure: she has to balance reintroducing herself to voters on an accelerated timeline while also selecting a running mate on a truncated vetting schedule

Would love to learn more!

Who are you arguing with here? Best I can tell, no one was making a claim about the essential nature of what is a Jew before you posited that; they were talking about how some Israeli programs give diaspora Jews connection they wouldn’t otherwise have. That’s what many of these programs advertise.

I struggle to understand how you can maintain an awareness of the Documentary Hypothesis and academic scholarship broadly while also staunchly defending an essentialist reading of Judaism that also misses the entire context of the prior conversation