@abelland.bsky.social
No. You don't have any clue about the topic and you straight say false statement. You reject what UNSCEAR/WHO says preferring parroting what antinuclear documentary says.
You don't care about future generations but only about your ideology.
You don't care about future generations but only about your ideology.
October 26, 2025 at 8:26 PM
No. You don't have any clue about the topic and you straight say false statement. You reject what UNSCEAR/WHO says preferring parroting what antinuclear documentary says.
You don't care about future generations but only about your ideology.
You don't care about future generations but only about your ideology.
You lie and you are a troll. You said that nuclear power plants are often led by the military. Which is a lie.
October 26, 2025 at 8:22 PM
You lie and you are a troll. You said that nuclear power plants are often led by the military. Which is a lie.
Nice that the guy blocked me... When you are not able to bring arguments that's the only move left to do
October 26, 2025 at 7:15 PM
Nice that the guy blocked me... When you are not able to bring arguments that's the only move left to do
So you are telling a lie and I am tasked to prove anything on that lie? That's not how it works my friend.
Having a nice day too!
Having a nice day too!
October 26, 2025 at 11:01 AM
So you are telling a lie and I am tasked to prove anything on that lie? That's not how it works my friend.
Having a nice day too!
Having a nice day too!
Yeah. Costs. Tell me again about that after Germany spent 500 billions euros for energiewende. Which is not only near sufficient to finish the transition.
Germany can only dream of France's electricity competitiveness and cleaniness.
Germany can only dream of France's electricity competitiveness and cleaniness.
October 26, 2025 at 10:59 AM
Yeah. Costs. Tell me again about that after Germany spent 500 billions euros for energiewende. Which is not only near sufficient to finish the transition.
Germany can only dream of France's electricity competitiveness and cleaniness.
Germany can only dream of France's electricity competitiveness and cleaniness.
Which are research reactors, not power reactors. They do not produce electricity.
So again, your argument is flawed. You can use this against research reactors (which produce life saving radiopharmaceuticals btw..) but not power plants that are not meant to produce weapon grade plutonium BY DESIGN
So again, your argument is flawed. You can use this against research reactors (which produce life saving radiopharmaceuticals btw..) but not power plants that are not meant to produce weapon grade plutonium BY DESIGN
October 26, 2025 at 10:53 AM
Which are research reactors, not power reactors. They do not produce electricity.
So again, your argument is flawed. You can use this against research reactors (which produce life saving radiopharmaceuticals btw..) but not power plants that are not meant to produce weapon grade plutonium BY DESIGN
So again, your argument is flawed. You can use this against research reactors (which produce life saving radiopharmaceuticals btw..) but not power plants that are not meant to produce weapon grade plutonium BY DESIGN
North Korea is an example of a country that has nuclear weapons but not nuclear plants. So your example is flawed.
Many European countries, Canada, Mexico, South Korea, Japan, UAE (despite the sun) and many more have or are planning to have nuclear power based on western designs.
Many European countries, Canada, Mexico, South Korea, Japan, UAE (despite the sun) and many more have or are planning to have nuclear power based on western designs.
October 26, 2025 at 10:43 AM
North Korea is an example of a country that has nuclear weapons but not nuclear plants. So your example is flawed.
Many European countries, Canada, Mexico, South Korea, Japan, UAE (despite the sun) and many more have or are planning to have nuclear power based on western designs.
Many European countries, Canada, Mexico, South Korea, Japan, UAE (despite the sun) and many more have or are planning to have nuclear power based on western designs.
They make audits and independent inspection. So they can see if data could have had manipulated and compare with their own samples/simulations. And deaths, in a country like Japan, are difficult to hide at scale.
And for sure I trust them more than a anti-nuclear movement making documentaries.
And for sure I trust them more than a anti-nuclear movement making documentaries.
October 26, 2025 at 10:38 AM
They make audits and independent inspection. So they can see if data could have had manipulated and compare with their own samples/simulations. And deaths, in a country like Japan, are difficult to hide at scale.
And for sure I trust them more than a anti-nuclear movement making documentaries.
And for sure I trust them more than a anti-nuclear movement making documentaries.
Which is false. There are some running right now while we write each other.
France shut down superphenix for political, not economical or technical reasons
France shut down superphenix for political, not economical or technical reasons
October 26, 2025 at 10:35 AM
Which is false. There are some running right now while we write each other.
France shut down superphenix for political, not economical or technical reasons
France shut down superphenix for political, not economical or technical reasons
Except that many countries have or are planning to have nuclear even without nuclear weapons.
So this argument doesn't hold.
So this argument doesn't hold.
October 26, 2025 at 10:33 AM
Except that many countries have or are planning to have nuclear even without nuclear weapons.
So this argument doesn't hold.
So this argument doesn't hold.
WHO and UNSCEAR also make their independent analysis. And no amount of antinuclear propaganda is going to change that.
October 26, 2025 at 10:28 AM
WHO and UNSCEAR also make their independent analysis. And no amount of antinuclear propaganda is going to change that.
You clearly like being fooled by countries like Russia and China
October 26, 2025 at 10:27 AM
You clearly like being fooled by countries like Russia and China
Since there are working prototypes working right now of even hundreds MWe. So basically already industrial scale. What do you mean by "not tested"?!
The lies were that a system 100% based on renewables were going to be cheaper and cleaner than anything else. Which was proved wrong.
The lies were that a system 100% based on renewables were going to be cheaper and cleaner than anything else. Which was proved wrong.
October 26, 2025 at 10:25 AM
Since there are working prototypes working right now of even hundreds MWe. So basically already industrial scale. What do you mean by "not tested"?!
The lies were that a system 100% based on renewables were going to be cheaper and cleaner than anything else. Which was proved wrong.
The lies were that a system 100% based on renewables were going to be cheaper and cleaner than anything else. Which was proved wrong.
Sorry, you are wrong. Politicized documentaries do not count. What counts are international commissions reports (WHO and UNSCEAR).
October 26, 2025 at 10:21 AM
Sorry, you are wrong. Politicized documentaries do not count. What counts are international commissions reports (WHO and UNSCEAR).
Germany, after having been over-reliant on Russian gas, will suffer again on being over-reliant on Chinese PV panel, wind turbine components and batteries.
October 26, 2025 at 10:16 AM
Germany, after having been over-reliant on Russian gas, will suffer again on being over-reliant on Chinese PV panel, wind turbine components and batteries.
False. The technology is based on well known principles. And there are already working prototypes that operated for decades without any particular issue.
October 26, 2025 at 10:14 AM
False. The technology is based on well known principles. And there are already working prototypes that operated for decades without any particular issue.
This is false. Japan didn't cover anything. There were no documented cases of radiation related deaths nor observed increase in cancer rates.
That's why, despite Fukushima, Japan is doing the most logical thing: restarting their nuclear plants and planning more.
That's why, despite Fukushima, Japan is doing the most logical thing: restarting their nuclear plants and planning more.
October 26, 2025 at 10:12 AM
This is false. Japan didn't cover anything. There were no documented cases of radiation related deaths nor observed increase in cancer rates.
That's why, despite Fukushima, Japan is doing the most logical thing: restarting their nuclear plants and planning more.
That's why, despite Fukushima, Japan is doing the most logical thing: restarting their nuclear plants and planning more.
Regarding the burden for the future: for many products and goods, including renewables, toxic waste that is eternal is produced. And we are talking orders of magnitude higher quantities than nuclear waste.
For nuclear we are not yet there, but at least there are the plants to build waste burners.
For nuclear we are not yet there, but at least there are the plants to build waste burners.
October 26, 2025 at 10:05 AM
Regarding the burden for the future: for many products and goods, including renewables, toxic waste that is eternal is produced. And we are talking orders of magnitude higher quantities than nuclear waste.
For nuclear we are not yet there, but at least there are the plants to build waste burners.
For nuclear we are not yet there, but at least there are the plants to build waste burners.
Germany had the most advanced and week kept II gen reactor in a relatively disaster free area. And despite the hundreds of billion poured in renewables, the country is lagging behind in terms of competitiveness and cleaniness wrt. countries which did not abandon nuclear, se the link above.
October 26, 2025 at 10:01 AM
Germany had the most advanced and week kept II gen reactor in a relatively disaster free area. And despite the hundreds of billion poured in renewables, the country is lagging behind in terms of competitiveness and cleaniness wrt. countries which did not abandon nuclear, se the link above.
Chernobyl was a different plant compared to what Germany had. It had no protection systems, badly trained personnel and unsafe design. Fukushima was it by a tsunami produced by the fourth strongest earthquake. And yet, even if the plant was old, the consequences were not nearly as bad as Chernobyl
October 26, 2025 at 9:58 AM
Chernobyl was a different plant compared to what Germany had. It had no protection systems, badly trained personnel and unsafe design. Fukushima was it by a tsunami produced by the fourth strongest earthquake. And yet, even if the plant was old, the consequences were not nearly as bad as Chernobyl
Germany has one of the most polluting and expensive energy system of western Europe, killing thousand Europeans (not only Germans). Shutting down nuclear before having shutting down coal and gas generation was the dumbest move Germany could have had to damage their present and future generations.
October 26, 2025 at 9:41 AM
Germany has one of the most polluting and expensive energy system of western Europe, killing thousand Europeans (not only Germans). Shutting down nuclear before having shutting down coal and gas generation was the dumbest move Germany could have had to damage their present and future generations.
I hope so, but I will take care of not suffering from it.
October 26, 2025 at 9:06 AM
I hope so, but I will take care of not suffering from it.