Por último, se explican las posiciones negacionistas o antiecologistas a las que puede conducir el populismo y el nativismo de la derecha radical, así como la posible articulación ambientalista del nativismo.

En el segundo, se ilustra la propuesta de articulación populista de la política climática y ambiental por determinados actores que parten de una concepción positiva del populismo, dando lugar a lo que aquí denominamos “populismo verde”.

Este trabajo busca profundizar en las relaciones entre populismo y política verde. En el primer lugar, analizamos las conexiones y tensiones que se producen entre el populismo y el ecologismo como ideologías políticas.

5) To find out more about the ideological orientation of incivism, the escalation of this phenomenon in online conversations, and the interpretation of the results, read the paper 🤓➡️
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1...

4) In ideological or partisan communities, incivility tends to be targeted against minorities, opposing ideological groups, or public actors (e.g., politicians) while in the more plural spaces, attacks against other users prevail (see the paper to read our interpretation of it).

3) Results show that posts violating polite norms of conversation were more frequent in partisan or ideological subreddits than in those without clear political or ideological bias. The same holds for the prevalence of targeted incivility (e.g., threaten a specific group).

2) We compare levels of incivility and impoliteness across 2 types of subreddits (communities on Reddit): those that clearly identify their ideological or political identity (eg, r/Conservative) and those without any predetermined ideological or political identity (eg, r/Politics).

1) In this article, we want to answer whether the prevalence of impoliteness and incivility is higher in online environments where echo chamber effects are more likely to occur. To do so, we analyse the online debate about immigration on Reddit.