Super interesting! I see you haven't gone back to exams or anything like that. Do you think it's sustainable and that students aren't just using LLMs as a massive crutch anyhow?

Very relicable 😆

It would be cool to compare the false negatives from just using the abstract! But yea, one would think they might under count some stuff. Other elements of precision/recall are also interesting.

I dunno. Maybe it is worth it to distinguish research designs and estimators? I think that methods is growing alongside survey experiments. But I get the point! It's a subset of natural experiment.

I guess we should commend AJPS for making big steps in being more global. How does this differ from this Knutsen paper? www.duo.uio.no/bitstream/ha...

Unexpected Event Study Design?

The # is a bit arbitrary - maybe worse than statistical rules of thumb. But I think you are in this game bc you have multiple good ideas about publishable papers; hopefully, one figures a way to parcel them out steadily. Clumping sucks. I had a COVID backlog and put 10 for review at a time 🔫 🤯.

That's very cool. But the day seems a bit arbitrary hard to estimate, no?

Thanks @joenoonan.se! I’m glad you found it useful!

That’s awesome. Lemme know if you want me to give any feedback.

I second this motion!