Thank you!

Oh wow, that is very kind of you to follow-up 🙂. Thanks!

No worries!

Could I please be added as well?

I suspect that some Dems didn’t vote due to the position of both candidates on Israel and Gaza. I also suspect that Trump did win over many black and Hispanic male voters, but my theory is that the closure and consolidation of polling locations had a huge impact and disproportionately affected Dems.

💯🎉🥳

I think the conversation is what is important. I’m honestly here for the comments and correspondence 😜

I think part of it is a lack of clarity about what role preprint servers should play. That’s probably what the OP is responding to. I’m probably just restating the issue, but I don’t feel adequately informed to assert anything concretely. I agree with much of what YOU have said, though 🤔🙂

I’d be remiss if I didn’t acknowledge that I’m agnostic. What I will say is that there should be some demarcation. I think that blogs, empirical articles, and preprint servers aren’t entirely mutually exclusive and probably shouldn’t be, but it would be helpful to have some delineation.

This is a good example of a project that is methodological rather than theoretical, and sometimes journals want authors to integrate theory even when it takes away from important methodological groundwork. I don’t think this is an issue for our paper, but if it was, PsyArXiv is a great alternative.

To give another example, I was planning to upload a brief report on PsyArXiv about statistically comparing human-generated transcriptions against AI-defined transcriptions of child speech. The only reason we didn’t was because the project fell within the scope of a recently announced special issue.

PsyArXiv doesn’t have a paywall, for one, and that makes articles more accessible. Also, lots of folks upload articles on meta science, best practices for data management, and opinion pieces that don’t make empirical claims but instead center around open science issues in the field.