Some of my articles (very.few to date) are particularly targeted at people who may be known (more less) in a field and yet have played a role in linguistics. Sometimes a bit of a tight rope exercise, but it opens up conversations.

can we settle for 'one of the founders of..' 😀

I agree that as a anthropologist he is fairly well knows. But from a Linguistics perspective (my niche) i never heard his name once in all my years of study

I found a way: I just don't read, I don't listen to what they spew out.
I apply the same to anyone who served in his cabinet. I won't waste my time with a bunch if incompetent, unethical, lying bunch of third rate cretins.....