Quasar
9924sept.bsky.social
Quasar
@9924sept.bsky.social
And really I don't like JKR either. But her definition just doesn't exclude us as women. We obviously still apply.
October 24, 2025 at 6:48 PM
Most of us have an underdeveloped uterus. Regardless, we aren't without egg producing equipment, which is part of the definition given. She even mentions faulty equipment, which can include our malformed uterus. It is still a female organ, typical or malformed. Anyone obviously knows we are women
October 24, 2025 at 6:48 PM
Women with MRKH belong on the female part of the binary or spectrum. We don't prove shit. There is nothing male about us.
And MRKH doesn't influence our identity, it causes us grief and frustration given we were never given the chance to carry our own children.
October 24, 2025 at 6:47 PM
Likewise. Respectfully, my uterine condition has nothing to do with trans women. Only female people are born with this and experience uterine infertility. I understand trans women have issues related to their identity amongst others but that doesn't mean making false comparisons.
October 23, 2025 at 4:39 PM
The condition is not a variation nor is it a trait (like an identity!!!) but it is a medical issue causing uterine infertility, that we may or may not choose to use treatment for.
October 23, 2025 at 4:13 PM
MRKH isn't an intersex condition, it does not cause a discrepancy between chromosomes & phenotype, as we are entirely female. We are born with underdevelopment or absence of the upper 2/3 vagina. No? We aren't forced... to have surgery. She wasn't given much options and that's all she could do...
October 23, 2025 at 4:12 PM
MRKH is actually a birth defect of the uterus and upper vagina... like she literally has an underdeveloped or absent uterus/upper vagina where she can never experience pregnancy and have her own children. That is a diagnosable condition that only occurs in women...
October 23, 2025 at 4:10 PM
Please shut up. MAGA is retarded but they don't care about women with MRKH and defining them based on childbirth. They very well know we have a woman's health condition causing uterine infertility.
October 23, 2025 at 4:06 PM
MRKH is a female reproductive condition causing uterine infertility. We generally have an underdeveloped uterus and shortened canal, with normal ovarian function so we can have our own bio kids through fertility treatment.
October 23, 2025 at 4:01 PM
Women with MRKH whose identity matches their biology is because... we are female. Its not because we want to call ourselves women, but because we literally are women since our anatomy is entirely female. + most of us have an underdeveloped uterus. Sex isn't some checklist.
October 23, 2025 at 4:00 PM
Women w/ (MRKH)*
No, it doesnt cause absence of the ovaries. We have normal ovarian function like any other woman, we are the largest recipient of uterus transplants. We generally have an underdeveloped uterus and vagina.
No, we have a normal vulva, that's why the condition is diagnosed late.
October 23, 2025 at 3:57 PM
MRKH isn't an "intersex variant," because it doesn't cause a discrepancy between the sex chromosomes and phenotype. Both are female in the case of MRKH, thus no discrepancy so not intersex. Ik you don't have this so why are you speaking on it?
PCOS isn't intersex either.
October 23, 2025 at 3:53 PM
We are egg producing. Women w/ MRKH produce eggs cuz we have normal ovarian function. It is a uterine infertility condition generally causing an underdeveloped uterus. The uterus is faulty- LITERALLY WHAT SHE SAID. And it's not what produces eggs, we have normal ovaries for that like any other woman
October 23, 2025 at 3:51 PM
Women w/ MRKH dont break the sex binary and are absolutely apart of it. Please stop removing us from the female sex we obviously belong it. Also, no JKR isn't saying we don't exist, because we don't apply here since women w MRKH have normal ovarian function. We've an underdeveloped uterus generally.
October 23, 2025 at 3:49 PM
Wrong, women with MRKH have normal egg producing equipment, like ovaries. We produce hormones thus eggs just like any other woman.
October 23, 2025 at 3:47 PM
You're implying DSD is diagnosed in only those who have mismatched sex characteristics. This isn't true as unambiguous female with nothing male about them can have a DSD since DSD, in its broadened sense, can include any congenital reproductive condition.
October 23, 2025 at 3:23 PM
Women with MRKH* generally have an underdeveloped uterus and shortened upper vagina. We have normal ovarian function and can have our own bio kids through fertility treatment. We are the largest recipients of uterus transplants.
October 23, 2025 at 3:21 PM
Only women are diagnosed with MRKH? Because it affects Müllerian/female development of the uterus and upper vagina in only female fetuses? We are unambiguously female... come tf on. Only females can be diagnosed with a uterine condition and have a diagnosis for it and have it affect her fertility
October 23, 2025 at 3:20 PM
Yes a lack of ovaries is not a feature of MRKH. We typically have normally functioning ovaries, because MRKH is a Müllerian anomaly, not an ovarian one. Most of us have an underdeveloped uterus (and shortened birth canal).
October 23, 2025 at 3:18 PM
Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome doesnt cause women to be born w/o ovaries, but generally w/ an underdeveloped uterus and shortened vagina. We've normal ovarian function and can have our own bio kids. If there is an ovarian condition present alongside MRKH, its a distinct condition from MRKH
October 23, 2025 at 3:17 PM
Wrong. It's where female babies are born with an underdeveloped or absent uterus & upper vagina. We have normal ovarian function and thus can have our own biological kids through fertility treatment.
October 23, 2025 at 3:14 PM
MRKH doesnt cause women to be born w/o ovaries, it causes women to have been born (most often) with an underdeveloped uterus and shortened vagina, & normal ovarian function so we can have our own kids. We're the largest recipient of uterus transplants. Missing ovaries isnt a feature of the condition
October 23, 2025 at 3:13 PM
Ugh. No, we aren't born w/o any reproductive anatomy and NO we aren't intersex. Intersex causes mismatched congenital male & female characteristics. This isn't the case for MRKH.
And most have an underdeveloped uterus/vagina w normal ovaries. Its a female health condition causing uterine infertility
October 23, 2025 at 3:11 PM
Correct. :)
October 23, 2025 at 3:09 PM