96deff33fa162942.bsky.social
@96deff33fa162942.bsky.social
Who would do such a thing, use their platform to encourage acts of stochastic terrorism against their enemies?

Picture unrelated.
November 15, 2025 at 9:09 PM
learning a new shell and if you want something done right, you've got to do it yourself (poorly approximate pi).
November 15, 2025 at 7:10 PM
cowards
November 15, 2025 at 5:58 PM
The Education platform also shares with the AI Porn platform. I'm pretty sure with a little bit of Javascript DOM hackery, you could rig up their Education platform to replace the Idle Animation Shakespeare with a much more fucked up combination.
November 15, 2025 at 7:33 AM
And the cherry on top, their "Education" platform, with an API so open that anyone has visibility of *all student accounts* including *email addresses* and *password hashes*.
November 15, 2025 at 6:41 AM
Price list for having an LLM write your posts for you...
November 15, 2025 at 6:35 AM
Here's an example of one of their base videos that it works off of.
Found it funny because you can hear the videographers instructions still.
FWIW suggests to me the Penthouse app mock-up is probably a real plan, since she is a model for them.

penthouse.2wai.ai/virtual
November 14, 2025 at 7:43 PM
some pretty funny choices on their part, hidden amongst the various waifu voice options...
November 14, 2025 at 7:24 PM
From what I can tell, this is video deepfakery attached to LLM and lipsync.

Dev team is probably .cn, they're also trying to do waifus, including this mockup of a Penthouse app.

Their API reveals a bunch of their avatars.

So the company selling a cheap AI imitation your Nan is also doing AI porn.
November 14, 2025 at 7:20 PM
Okay but,

As soon as his documentary drops this whole misunderstanding will be cleared right up and we'll all look pretty silly for thinking this!
November 14, 2025 at 3:54 PM
he definitely had some overlapping interests, if this is accurate.
November 14, 2025 at 1:46 PM
November 13, 2025 at 12:39 PM
November 13, 2025 at 11:16 AM
someone recounting a meeting with Bill Gates, but from the only perspective that Jeffrey actually cares about: "did you fuck"
November 13, 2025 at 11:16 AM
reposted this because I love insane military slide decks.

but instead reposting with added context: its not Palantir its NATO.

www.japcc.org/articles/ele...
November 8, 2025 at 10:09 PM
lmao at the timing on the company name change to "defence procurement" before going back to "campaign pr".
November 6, 2025 at 8:27 PM
One of the things, aside from nobody talking anymore about the employee being targeted and the timing of the reporting, is that people (in this case ex-spooks themselves) are still writing justifications for law enforcement to have these powers.

Despite what we all see and know it's being used for.
October 30, 2025 at 9:57 AM
no they weren't.

you can't take a "pivot trail" to a "live C2" network because you were drawing erroneous connections based on generic HTTP error pages mistaken as unique identifiers as being right.

it was obviously a crypto scam, there's no cybercrime C2 or Russian nexus like you've claimed.
October 27, 2025 at 1:16 AM
Another mark in the "it's not real time, it's potemkin software and probably why that one prompt choice was disregarded"

OP claims it'll be open source, I bet it's never published and is fully vibe coded. The whole thing seems like a shabby version of what you could slap together in an afternoon.
October 25, 2025 at 10:56 PM
I did some digging and found the OP (?).

I think what we have is a consistent UI that isn't generated. the prompt choices and presumably the last frame of the previous video are used to generate the next scene.

So we get the consistent mock-up menu around 8 sec clips, I'd assume not in real time.
October 25, 2025 at 10:51 PM
its strange to me that I see this name regularly in my feed, given the history.

obviously they don't put it on their resume but, your ex boss was recently sporting a Hitler Mustache and you were cheer leading the current US administration not that long ago.

how seriously am I meant to take you?
October 12, 2025 at 3:29 AM
When confronted that they've taken *exceptionally, definitionally non-unique hashes* of *error messages* as *unique identifiers* for websites, they simply disregard that and move on.

Reality simply cannot get in the way of their story.
September 16, 2025 at 6:27 PM
Thank you for appreciating my input, it really means a lot to me.

Look, it's another generic error message you've recorded as a unique fingerprint hash.
September 16, 2025 at 6:13 PM
and there are a bunch of people I've seen doing this shit over the last few days, chasing some phantom connections between definitionally shared hosting infrastructure.

please do not fall for this shit again, it's people who barely understand what they're looking at.
September 16, 2025 at 5:42 PM
I'm sorry, but this is blueanon shit.

There are a lot of "ethical hacker", "osint" dweebs out here reading tea leaves and connecting dots between reports from services they don't understand.

the sha256 hash they're tracking is a 404 error message.

yes, there is a sketchy host. it's unrelated.
September 16, 2025 at 5:34 PM