Yeah I remember this process… besides beeing bland and without feedback, like you said, I was just shoked about the pseudoscienve test (that is not even in most languages). And they even tell you that you should take the test in your native language.

I love your GDPR request solution though!

posted today!

BTW I peeked at the automerge Rust? Collaborative editing is an example where one probably *has* to resort to unsafe behavior (you're the expert there!) so I'm mostly advocating for more encapsulation/comments in that case.

jhellerstein.github.io/blog/crdt-do...

One of the best books around. Every engineer should read it.

The main gotcha is that some of Rust's time logic (e.g. Instant::now()) doesn't exist in WASM, and you'll just get a runtime error. The fixes involve making these optional.

This imo goes deeper than WASM: it proves that timely doesn't rely on real time, and is purely event driven; no timeouts.

That’s awesome! Is it open to the public?

Ostia, vaya tres cunyats de bar de mala mort.

Will check. Thanks!

That’s great! Is there any planned dates for releasing it in Europe?

The mood

Thank you!

While the advancements in delta and other protocols/sw to support atomic writes are a great step forward, I think it’s mislesding to equal them to systems that support multi-object transacions, like traditional dbms.

We should avoid useing the same word for things that provide different guarantees

Ah, bitemporality (as the simplest form) and its mind melting logic. It’s really fun all its quirks.

Or put them in a paella!