becomes much less salient albeit the problem it solves remains important on some level given its role in our overall existence.

And the issue regarding a team of people problem solving how to effectively kick a ball into a goal becomes more about the problem than the interplay of individual levels of consciousness, collaboration and/or communication. And, certainly, in this case the issue of entanglement simply …

For example, the issue of entanglement becomes more about our choice of descriptors rather than the problem that entanglement solves or partially describes, which would then become paramount.

If we define problem as that which is to be solved, then we do not need to assume space nor time as these become descriptors of solutions, thus possibly predictors of how consciousness will solve similar (or the same) problems in the future.

This becomes systemized as we scale from elementary particles upward as context is no longer defined solely by matter and/or consciousness, but by problems.

This assumes that consciousness is the act of problem solving w/ or w/out intent.

This is because the primary function of consciousness is to solve problems, creating and sustaining matter is but only one example.

2. We exist because the intrinsic nature of matter is consciousness.

1. Assume that the intrinsic nature of matter is consciousness.

Thank you for your reply. It is seemingly consistent with some thoughts I had as I digested your perspective. If I may be so bold, I am curious as to your response to the following—recognizing I am sharing in draft form, which probably isn’t good practice: