@2plus2equals.bsky.social
If 2. is small and is just rounded up, 2. + 2. can equal 3. For large values rounded down, it can be 5. It can never be 6.
I read historical documents a small chunk a day to understand them. That’s all this feed is.
I read historical documents a small chunk a day to understand them. That’s all this feed is.
30/Fred
Continuing with his dissent Murphy notes that some did prove disloyal, just like those of German and Italian descent who were judged individually, not as a group like Korematsu.
He argues all have ancestral loyalties - I’d add even natives have ties to their own nation not the US.
Continuing with his dissent Murphy notes that some did prove disloyal, just like those of German and Italian descent who were judged individually, not as a group like Korematsu.
He argues all have ancestral loyalties - I’d add even natives have ties to their own nation not the US.
May 28, 2025 at 6:15 AM
30/Fred
Continuing with his dissent Murphy notes that some did prove disloyal, just like those of German and Italian descent who were judged individually, not as a group like Korematsu.
He argues all have ancestral loyalties - I’d add even natives have ties to their own nation not the US.
Continuing with his dissent Murphy notes that some did prove disloyal, just like those of German and Italian descent who were judged individually, not as a group like Korematsu.
He argues all have ancestral loyalties - I’d add even natives have ties to their own nation not the US.
9/Fred
Section 3 refers to the “instant case” (legal speak for the case currently before the court) being that there was information Korematsu violated a law passed by Congress, 18 U.S.C.A. §97(a), quoted in section 4.
Can’t find this section now on a quick search, apparently repealed in 1948.
Section 3 refers to the “instant case” (legal speak for the case currently before the court) being that there was information Korematsu violated a law passed by Congress, 18 U.S.C.A. §97(a), quoted in section 4.
Can’t find this section now on a quick search, apparently repealed in 1948.
May 7, 2025 at 5:58 AM
9/Fred
Section 3 refers to the “instant case” (legal speak for the case currently before the court) being that there was information Korematsu violated a law passed by Congress, 18 U.S.C.A. §97(a), quoted in section 4.
Can’t find this section now on a quick search, apparently repealed in 1948.
Section 3 refers to the “instant case” (legal speak for the case currently before the court) being that there was information Korematsu violated a law passed by Congress, 18 U.S.C.A. §97(a), quoted in section 4.
Can’t find this section now on a quick search, apparently repealed in 1948.
7/Fred
The sections of the ruling are numbered, and 1 is the charges.
Korematsu was charged with being of Japanese descent and remaining in “military area #1” described in exclusion order 34, linked.
The ruling notes that there is no question of his loyalty.
www.javadc.org/java/docs/19...
The sections of the ruling are numbered, and 1 is the charges.
Korematsu was charged with being of Japanese descent and remaining in “military area #1” described in exclusion order 34, linked.
The ruling notes that there is no question of his loyalty.
www.javadc.org/java/docs/19...
May 5, 2025 at 6:03 AM
7/Fred
The sections of the ruling are numbered, and 1 is the charges.
Korematsu was charged with being of Japanese descent and remaining in “military area #1” described in exclusion order 34, linked.
The ruling notes that there is no question of his loyalty.
www.javadc.org/java/docs/19...
The sections of the ruling are numbered, and 1 is the charges.
Korematsu was charged with being of Japanese descent and remaining in “military area #1” described in exclusion order 34, linked.
The ruling notes that there is no question of his loyalty.
www.javadc.org/java/docs/19...
April 20, 2025 at 8:50 PM
Texas DSHS tells a different story.
April 13, 2025 at 10:57 PM
Texas DSHS tells a different story.
Clearly and tragically false.
April 13, 2025 at 5:11 AM
Clearly and tragically false.
Schimel should read a bit on what God smote people for in days of old.
April 1, 2025 at 12:32 AM
Schimel should read a bit on what God smote people for in days of old.
Just reposting this little bit from Frederick Douglass - this is not a new problem.
There’s a reason so many have turned away and the church has become a fallen institution.
There’s a reason so many have turned away and the church has become a fallen institution.
March 28, 2025 at 2:02 AM
Just reposting this little bit from Frederick Douglass - this is not a new problem.
There’s a reason so many have turned away and the church has become a fallen institution.
There’s a reason so many have turned away and the church has become a fallen institution.
33/What
Beyond simply turning a blind eye to the problems and focusing on going through the motions of religion, FD accuses the church of palming off the blasphemy of endorsing slavery as Christianity.
FD argues that Christianity used this way is an endorsement of atheism.
Beyond simply turning a blind eye to the problems and focusing on going through the motions of religion, FD accuses the church of palming off the blasphemy of endorsing slavery as Christianity.
FD argues that Christianity used this way is an endorsement of atheism.
March 28, 2025 at 1:59 AM
33/What
Beyond simply turning a blind eye to the problems and focusing on going through the motions of religion, FD accuses the church of palming off the blasphemy of endorsing slavery as Christianity.
FD argues that Christianity used this way is an endorsement of atheism.
Beyond simply turning a blind eye to the problems and focusing on going through the motions of religion, FD accuses the church of palming off the blasphemy of endorsing slavery as Christianity.
FD argues that Christianity used this way is an endorsement of atheism.
Christians have always been bad at this.
March 25, 2025 at 12:13 AM
Christians have always been bad at this.
29/What
This is a bit of scripture that FD invokes which is something I ran across in my own reading that, well, resonates.
FD uses the verse in referring to these tithes of spices as the trappings of religion (psalms, sacrament, ceremony) as things that would get a response if affected.
This is a bit of scripture that FD invokes which is something I ran across in my own reading that, well, resonates.
FD uses the verse in referring to these tithes of spices as the trappings of religion (psalms, sacrament, ceremony) as things that would get a response if affected.
March 24, 2025 at 3:53 AM
29/What
This is a bit of scripture that FD invokes which is something I ran across in my own reading that, well, resonates.
FD uses the verse in referring to these tithes of spices as the trappings of religion (psalms, sacrament, ceremony) as things that would get a response if affected.
This is a bit of scripture that FD invokes which is something I ran across in my own reading that, well, resonates.
FD uses the verse in referring to these tithes of spices as the trappings of religion (psalms, sacrament, ceremony) as things that would get a response if affected.
Obama inauguration:
March 23, 2025 at 11:40 PM
Obama inauguration:
Here’s a relevant line. Reading through the political doublespeak it’s clearly about race.
March 16, 2025 at 7:43 PM
Here’s a relevant line. Reading through the political doublespeak it’s clearly about race.
Which report?
This one? (P. 30 excerpt, Smith, 7Jan25)
This one? (P. 30 excerpt, Smith, 7Jan25)
March 12, 2025 at 9:08 PM
Which report?
This one? (P. 30 excerpt, Smith, 7Jan25)
This one? (P. 30 excerpt, Smith, 7Jan25)
They’ve been at it for a while.
Just ask Elián Gonzalez.
Just ask Elián Gonzalez.
March 10, 2025 at 9:41 PM
They’ve been at it for a while.
Just ask Elián Gonzalez.
Just ask Elián Gonzalez.
Mission accomplished!
Bush the Younger really ruined that phrase for me, trying to reclaim it.
Bush the Younger really ruined that phrase for me, trying to reclaim it.
March 7, 2025 at 6:54 PM
Mission accomplished!
Bush the Younger really ruined that phrase for me, trying to reclaim it.
Bush the Younger really ruined that phrase for me, trying to reclaim it.
From the article that you obviously didn’t read:
March 3, 2025 at 3:22 PM
From the article that you obviously didn’t read:
Those protests are in no danger of threatening the government. This is the quote that sets off alarm bells, btw, as sounding like “I’m saying this because I have to.”
February 17, 2025 at 3:47 AM
Those protests are in no danger of threatening the government. This is the quote that sets off alarm bells, btw, as sounding like “I’m saying this because I have to.”
We could easily be around January 27th on this graph.
February 14, 2025 at 9:30 PM
We could easily be around January 27th on this graph.
