Tristan (200OK!)
@200ok.ca
npub1lapzkhq5ss32h9uretrm309ln6v4xuaspd3tnhrpzju7stk9cg6q76wg92
Right, but it’s an open source foundation he built in a weekend, that uses a protocol available on a device that most humans own
The more layers of decentralized communication available the better
The more layers of decentralized communication available the better
July 9, 2025 at 11:54 PM
Right, but it’s an open source foundation he built in a weekend, that uses a protocol available on a device that most humans own
The more layers of decentralized communication available the better
The more layers of decentralized communication available the better
Pray for me
What u guys trying out?
What u guys trying out?
May 2, 2025 at 3:26 AM
Pray for me
What u guys trying out?
What u guys trying out?
Yeah I watched it… obviously just add the cost of electricity into the charge of doing it… the GPU’s will pay for itself by doing this too..
Since training is time consuming have booked time for training..
Lathe cut vinyl took a year for me to get after booking my slot. It can be the same model.
Since training is time consuming have booked time for training..
Lathe cut vinyl took a year for me to get after booking my slot. It can be the same model.
April 16, 2025 at 2:16 PM
Yeah I watched it… obviously just add the cost of electricity into the charge of doing it… the GPU’s will pay for itself by doing this too..
Since training is time consuming have booked time for training..
Lathe cut vinyl took a year for me to get after booking my slot. It can be the same model.
Since training is time consuming have booked time for training..
Lathe cut vinyl took a year for me to get after booking my slot. It can be the same model.
Benn would you be interested in poisonifying peoples music for a fee like getting your music mastered? Maybe at a $ per minute rate?
April 13, 2025 at 7:29 PM
Benn would you be interested in poisonifying peoples music for a fee like getting your music mastered? Maybe at a $ per minute rate?
Well… I think I know how this can all have a happy ending
April 1, 2025 at 12:05 AM
Well… I think I know how this can all have a happy ending
You said what I want is not justified
March 28, 2025 at 2:26 AM
You said what I want is not justified
Right, but when a conservative tells me that they’re concerned of big government or dangers of nationalizing resources even if I don’t think like or agree with them with them, I can objectively look at it and realize that’s a fair concern of theirs cause I’m not blinded by my own beliefs
March 28, 2025 at 2:26 AM
Right, but when a conservative tells me that they’re concerned of big government or dangers of nationalizing resources even if I don’t think like or agree with them with them, I can objectively look at it and realize that’s a fair concern of theirs cause I’m not blinded by my own beliefs
Frankly I’m suprised this is even an argument
Saying I would like to know a rich current and potentially future leaders financial history is kind of a no brainer like yeh that’s fair duh
Saying I would like to know a rich current and potentially future leaders financial history is kind of a no brainer like yeh that’s fair duh
March 28, 2025 at 2:21 AM
Frankly I’m suprised this is even an argument
Saying I would like to know a rich current and potentially future leaders financial history is kind of a no brainer like yeh that’s fair duh
Saying I would like to know a rich current and potentially future leaders financial history is kind of a no brainer like yeh that’s fair duh
What you said literally infers that or else it wouldn’t even have been a relevant response
The argument is whether or not financial transparency in the ways for mentioned is 1. Important and 2. Effective
To which a response of yours is the CSIS leak being more
Important implying the dichotomy
The argument is whether or not financial transparency in the ways for mentioned is 1. Important and 2. Effective
To which a response of yours is the CSIS leak being more
Important implying the dichotomy
March 28, 2025 at 2:18 AM
What you said literally infers that or else it wouldn’t even have been a relevant response
The argument is whether or not financial transparency in the ways for mentioned is 1. Important and 2. Effective
To which a response of yours is the CSIS leak being more
Important implying the dichotomy
The argument is whether or not financial transparency in the ways for mentioned is 1. Important and 2. Effective
To which a response of yours is the CSIS leak being more
Important implying the dichotomy
Yeh that’s something to be concerned about too…. It’s not like you can only have one concern or the other
March 28, 2025 at 2:12 AM
Yeh that’s something to be concerned about too…. It’s not like you can only have one concern or the other
If politician Y says politician X had a bunch of investments (therefore friends) in Z therefore you might want to think about your vote
That’s not a lie that’s a fair political attack
If a politician is going to lie they are going to lie no matter what and there isn’t anything that can stop that
That’s not a lie that’s a fair political attack
If a politician is going to lie they are going to lie no matter what and there isn’t anything that can stop that
March 28, 2025 at 2:10 AM
If politician Y says politician X had a bunch of investments (therefore friends) in Z therefore you might want to think about your vote
That’s not a lie that’s a fair political attack
If a politician is going to lie they are going to lie no matter what and there isn’t anything that can stop that
That’s not a lie that’s a fair political attack
If a politician is going to lie they are going to lie no matter what and there isn’t anything that can stop that
I would argue the USA has much more reasons to be in the way it is…. Obviously I am not saying this is a silver bullet to kill corruption
You said mentioned multiple countries so I am assuming u can name more?
You said mentioned multiple countries so I am assuming u can name more?
March 28, 2025 at 2:07 AM
I would argue the USA has much more reasons to be in the way it is…. Obviously I am not saying this is a silver bullet to kill corruption
You said mentioned multiple countries so I am assuming u can name more?
You said mentioned multiple countries so I am assuming u can name more?
Those are all great things too and I think should be implemented but again to say Canadians having more knowledge on what a public servant has had ties with is bad because other politicians can use it as ammo is, imo, a rediculous take
It’s about having trust in those that serve us
It’s about having trust in those that serve us
March 28, 2025 at 2:06 AM
Those are all great things too and I think should be implemented but again to say Canadians having more knowledge on what a public servant has had ties with is bad because other politicians can use it as ammo is, imo, a rediculous take
It’s about having trust in those that serve us
It’s about having trust in those that serve us
sooo we should not have greater transparency incase the person we don’t like can use it as ammunition against the person we do like?
And Canadians are too stupid to know what’s true and what’s bs?
And Canadians are too stupid to know what’s true and what’s bs?
March 28, 2025 at 1:57 AM
sooo we should not have greater transparency incase the person we don’t like can use it as ammunition against the person we do like?
And Canadians are too stupid to know what’s true and what’s bs?
And Canadians are too stupid to know what’s true and what’s bs?
So you don’t think greater transparency in members of public office is a good thing?
I’m confused on what your argument is
I’m confused on what your argument is
March 28, 2025 at 1:54 AM
So you don’t think greater transparency in members of public office is a good thing?
I’m confused on what your argument is
I’m confused on what your argument is
I don’t think it’s a super radical position to say there’s room to grow in transparency with members of public office
And just because it’s a newer conversation because of fair skepticism towards and candidate doesn’t make it wrong to have its a net positive for our culture
And just because it’s a newer conversation because of fair skepticism towards and candidate doesn’t make it wrong to have its a net positive for our culture
March 28, 2025 at 1:53 AM
I don’t think it’s a super radical position to say there’s room to grow in transparency with members of public office
And just because it’s a newer conversation because of fair skepticism towards and candidate doesn’t make it wrong to have its a net positive for our culture
And just because it’s a newer conversation because of fair skepticism towards and candidate doesn’t make it wrong to have its a net positive for our culture
Saying it’s always accomplished currently is sort of hyperbolic considering the Trudeau WE scandal and Aga Khan Vacation for just a quick mention
March 28, 2025 at 1:50 AM
Saying it’s always accomplished currently is sort of hyperbolic considering the Trudeau WE scandal and Aga Khan Vacation for just a quick mention
I’m glad you asked
Higher public trust and accountability
Detecting conflicts of interest - sure there’s an ethics commish but public disclosure >
Discouraging corruption- could act as a deterrent to people who made unethical investments from running and or give them a low chance at winning
Higher public trust and accountability
Detecting conflicts of interest - sure there’s an ethics commish but public disclosure >
Discouraging corruption- could act as a deterrent to people who made unethical investments from running and or give them a low chance at winning
March 28, 2025 at 1:48 AM
I’m glad you asked
Higher public trust and accountability
Detecting conflicts of interest - sure there’s an ethics commish but public disclosure >
Discouraging corruption- could act as a deterrent to people who made unethical investments from running and or give them a low chance at winning
Higher public trust and accountability
Detecting conflicts of interest - sure there’s an ethics commish but public disclosure >
Discouraging corruption- could act as a deterrent to people who made unethical investments from running and or give them a low chance at winning
Sure it does, I am a voter, and I want greater transparency in party leader and PM’s financial histories which aren’t usually fully publically disclosed
And this election has made me realize that’s something I want for all candidates going forward
And if enough voters want that we should get that
And this election has made me realize that’s something I want for all candidates going forward
And if enough voters want that we should get that
March 28, 2025 at 1:38 AM
Sure it does, I am a voter, and I want greater transparency in party leader and PM’s financial histories which aren’t usually fully publically disclosed
And this election has made me realize that’s something I want for all candidates going forward
And if enough voters want that we should get that
And this election has made me realize that’s something I want for all candidates going forward
And if enough voters want that we should get that
well context is important - we have a global banker/business guy as pm and running currently so obviously it’s going to be a hot topic
It’s problematic to shut down discussions like this
Just because it’s a new concern culturally doesn’t mean it’s unjustified
It’s problematic to shut down discussions like this
Just because it’s a new concern culturally doesn’t mean it’s unjustified
March 28, 2025 at 1:35 AM
well context is important - we have a global banker/business guy as pm and running currently so obviously it’s going to be a hot topic
It’s problematic to shut down discussions like this
Just because it’s a new concern culturally doesn’t mean it’s unjustified
It’s problematic to shut down discussions like this
Just because it’s a new concern culturally doesn’t mean it’s unjustified
I would like that from everyone
March 28, 2025 at 1:28 AM
I would like that from everyone