My concern is the executive branch runs the jails. If they don’t respect court orders, why do they obey an order to keep someone locked up if they don’t have a problem with what that person did

Thank you very much! I am 100% outside your practice area but will work you into a client alert

This is a great tidbit. Do you happen to have a cite offhand? I would love to be able to reference this. If it’s in one of your papers lmk and I’ll try to cite that also

see, e.g., @jdmortenson.bsky.social's work and the other side just sort of pretending it doesn't exist

Right. She may have asked for an early exam in an attempt to make clear that she wasn't trying to game the system -- she'd have LESS time to study than her peers, so any unfairness would be borne by her. She may not have asked for a late exam bc she perceived that as less likely to be granted

I think companies would prefer not to defend on those grounds because that would involve an admission that the choice not to advertise on twitter was ideologically motivated 2/2

he's threatening an antitrust lawsuit, which is not the classical sort of SLAPP suit. While the illegal boycott he alleges is occurring could be characterized as the type of expressive conduct that would be covered by an anti-SLAPP statute 1/2