Minor Correction: Around 9:30 or so, I commented about an entry in Vallee’s journals mentioning Chris Mellon’s involvement with “advanced aeronautics and infotainment” in 2005. I looked it up again to verify and the entry was came in 2002, by way of Dr. Kit Green.

Thanks for watching and sharing! It’s an interesting possibility, or at worst a decent excuse to discuss the mindset of the elites involved in such efforts.

Thanks Dean! I Appreciate your appreciation! Most of the time I just try to say the things I need to hear. James makes it easy by asking really thoughtful questions. Insightful interviewer and a true pleasure to work with, and Nick is razor sharp with deep knowledge of phenomenology. Fun ping-pong.

lol the comments on this platform are so much better than X, where the only that gets play is loud noises. @neongalactic.bsky.social thanks again for having me on!

I’m there because information gets posted there that doesn’t get shared here (yet). That’s my excuse anyway.

It’s getting REALLY bad.

Thanks for listening, glad you enjoyed!

I hope someone at the Department of Defense steps up to answer the hard questions, but the truth may be that it serves them better not to. There must be some strategic advantage in leaving the question open—for now. Is it an ELINT honeytrap for China? An open invitation? Or Rhombus 4D? 3/3 🧶

Whatever the answer is, my mind always returns to a cynical but necessary question. How will this be turned to the advantage of those who oppose transparency? It seems to me there are numerous ways this activity, if allowed to fester, can be used to control of the UAP narrative. 2/3 🧶