Peter Tulip
petertulip.bsky.social
Peter Tulip
@petertulip.bsky.social

Chief economist at Centre for Independent Studies

Economics 86%
Engineering 9%
Pinned
This paper summarises what I see as the key points in the Australian housing debate, as of February 2024.
www.cis.org.au/wp-content/u... 1/8
www.cis.org.au

Reposted by Peter Tulip

The Symbolic Politics of Housing: voter dislike of the very actors who could ameliorate the housing shortage they suffer from probably exacerbates it.
osf.io/preprints/os...
OSF
osf.io

Reposted by Peter Tulip

The Victorian Liberal Party (including so-called 'classical liberal' Tim Wilson) joins local residents to oppose housing affordability and free markets.
www.smh.com.au/politics/vic...

If you are an ambitious politician looking for tomorrow's issue to champion, @scottwiener.bsky.social, California's top YIMBY legislator, provides a good model to follow.

NIMBYs in Brighton.
This is why housing is unaffordable.
Bayside residents are rallying against plans to introduce buildings up to 16 storeys in the area.

Residents marching in Brighton on Sunday argued the ill-conceived plan would overrun their suburbs’ population without adequate infrastructure or their consent.

Video: Cassandra Morgan and Sophie Boyd

Reposted by Peter Tulip

Bayside residents are rallying against plans to introduce buildings up to 16 storeys in the area.

Residents marching in Brighton on Sunday argued the ill-conceived plan would overrun their suburbs’ population without adequate infrastructure or their consent.

Video: Cassandra Morgan and Sophie Boyd

Reposted by Peter Tulip

Reposted by Peter Tulip

1/ If you're interested in housing and the debates within the Democratic party about how much is needed and how to get it built, you need to read this profile of CA NIMBY slayer @scottwiener.bsky.social by @jetjocko.bsky.social.

www.motherjones.com/politics/202...
Scott Wiener Defeated California’s NIMBYs. Can He Fix America’s Housing Crisis?
By running for Nancy Pelosi's seat, he's putting the "Abundance" theory to the test.
www.motherjones.com

Reposted by Peter Tulip

Reposted by Peter Tulip

Reposted by Peter Tulip

Reposted by Peter Tulip

Supporters of affordable housing requirements need to point to examples where it has worked. Because there is a lot of evidence of it being counter-productive.
In 2018, then-Mayor Ada Colau called Barcelona’s new 30% inclusionary housing requirement for projects over 600m^2 a “paradigm shift,” making housing “a right and not a commodity.” It was supposed to produce 330 affordable units a year. The reality: just 31 affordable apartments in all these years.
Cuando se ha aprobó esta medida dije repetidamente que iba a ser un fracaso y que no construirían nada de vivienda asequible. Se ha probado en mil sitios y no funciona.

Acerté. www.lavanguardia.com/local/barcel...

Reposted by Peter Tulip

Planning in NSW just got a bit better.

What have they changed? Read here: www.sydney.yimby.au/blog/plannin...