Elleard Felix Webster Joseph Heffern
@webystar.bsky.social
Symmetry break=eigenstate: Not to be affected by dimension(s) of mutation~=~you've replaced a symmetric facet w/ alternative, contextually immutable, component.
Pinned
I replaced the logic at the end to be indisputable.
Dual + dual spectralize the algebraic characters. That is the smartest goddamned thing I ever fucking wrote.
November 14, 2025 at 3:31 PM
Dual + dual spectralize the algebraic characters. That is the smartest goddamned thing I ever fucking wrote.
October 30, 2025 at 6:07 PM
YESSSSS!!!!! I am so not gonna lie; my haunted house literally solved this for me like, months ago, and literally has been trying to guide me with the weirdest shit. #MarkovNumbers #Unicity
October 27, 2025 at 2:18 PM
YESSSSS!!!!! I am so not gonna lie; my haunted house literally solved this for me like, months ago, and literally has been trying to guide me with the weirdest shit. #MarkovNumbers #Unicity
#MarkovNumbers #Unicity (hint: "42")
October 16, 2025 at 1:55 AM
#MarkovNumbers #Unicity (hint: "42")
Let a = (a'+i) and let b = (b'+j), for integers i and j. If true for a and b, and also true for a' and b', I suspect we have a major contradiction. #MarkovNumbers #Unicity
October 15, 2025 at 9:42 PM
Let a = (a'+i) and let b = (b'+j), for integers i and j. If true for a and b, and also true for a' and b', I suspect we have a major contradiction. #MarkovNumbers #Unicity
2025 09 23 02 33 New axiom: give credit where credit is due (and you know what I mean), or you don’t get to use what you’ve learned.
September 24, 2025 at 8:59 AM
2025 09 23 02 33 New axiom: give credit where credit is due (and you know what I mean), or you don’t get to use what you’ve learned.
I think I just got another one finally for real. When it rains, it pours. #numbertheprimes #markovnumbers #unicity
September 21, 2025 at 3:14 PM
I think I just got another one finally for real. When it rains, it pours. #numbertheprimes #markovnumbers #unicity
That was so annoying. I didn't meet one little criterion to apply the LET Lemma, but I knew it still applied, so I had to re-prove my specific case and it looks simple now, but I was pulling my damned hair out.#perfectnumber#perfectnumbers#oddperfectnumber#oldestopenproblem
September 21, 2025 at 12:22 PM
That was so annoying. I didn't meet one little criterion to apply the LET Lemma, but I knew it still applied, so I had to re-prove my specific case and it looks simple now, but I was pulling my damned hair out.#perfectnumber#perfectnumbers#oddperfectnumber#oldestopenproblem
#oddperfectnumber #perfectnumber #famousopenproblem #6days #perfectnumbers #numbertheory #LTElemma
I got this. I fought scrappily and incidentally made some errors even as I correctly rapidly claimed certain territory. ChatGPT[it], then "you"[ChatGPT].
heffern-my.sharepoint.com/personal/web...
I got this. I fought scrappily and incidentally made some errors even as I correctly rapidly claimed certain territory. ChatGPT[it], then "you"[ChatGPT].
heffern-my.sharepoint.com/personal/web...
September 21, 2025 at 3:09 AM
#oddperfectnumber #perfectnumber #famousopenproblem #6days #perfectnumbers #numbertheory #LTElemma
I got this. I fought scrappily and incidentally made some errors even as I correctly rapidly claimed certain territory. ChatGPT[it], then "you"[ChatGPT].
heffern-my.sharepoint.com/personal/web...
I got this. I fought scrappily and incidentally made some errors even as I correctly rapidly claimed certain territory. ChatGPT[it], then "you"[ChatGPT].
heffern-my.sharepoint.com/personal/web...
#oddperfectnumber #perfectnumber #famousopenproblem #6days #perfectnumbers #numbertheory #LTElemma
I got this. I fought scrappily and incidentally made some errors even as I correctly rapidly claimed certain territory. ChatGPT[it], then "you"[ChatGPT].
heffern-my.sharepoint.com/personal/web...
I got this. I fought scrappily and incidentally made some errors even as I correctly rapidly claimed certain territory. ChatGPT[it], then "you"[ChatGPT].
heffern-my.sharepoint.com/personal/web...
Sign in to your account
heffern-my.sharepoint.com
September 21, 2025 at 3:06 AM
#oddperfectnumber #perfectnumber #famousopenproblem #6days #perfectnumbers #numbertheory #LTElemma
I got this. I fought scrappily and incidentally made some errors even as I correctly rapidly claimed certain territory. ChatGPT[it], then "you"[ChatGPT].
heffern-my.sharepoint.com/personal/web...
I got this. I fought scrappily and incidentally made some errors even as I correctly rapidly claimed certain territory. ChatGPT[it], then "you"[ChatGPT].
heffern-my.sharepoint.com/personal/web...
Anyway, I didn't totally trust "PROOF 2" so I created a "PROOF 1." #overachiever #fire #happybirthdayemiliakitkat #perfectnumber #perfectnumbers #oddperfectnumber
heffern-my.sharepoint.com/:b:/p/webster/…
heffern-my.sharepoint.com/:b:/p/webster/…
September 19, 2025 at 12:37 PM
Anyway, I didn't totally trust "PROOF 2" so I created a "PROOF 1." #overachiever #fire #happybirthdayemiliakitkat #perfectnumber #perfectnumbers #oddperfectnumber
heffern-my.sharepoint.com/:b:/p/webster/…
heffern-my.sharepoint.com/:b:/p/webster/…
This I think makes sense. I now need to write the "crazy tricky algorithm" in question in the middle, but that shouldn't be too bad. #perfectnumbers #numbertheory #oddperfectnumber #perfectnumber lnkd.in/g6GJqKVB
September 19, 2025 at 11:11 AM
This I think makes sense. I now need to write the "crazy tricky algorithm" in question in the middle, but that shouldn't be too bad. #perfectnumbers #numbertheory #oddperfectnumber #perfectnumber lnkd.in/g6GJqKVB
"Your hope worked! I'm at nitty-gritty finish line stuff. The way I'm comparing sums of collections of residuals here is totally novel, off-the-beaten-path, and giving results. "Hence" brilliant :P." #perfectnumber #oddperfectnumber #numbertheory #math
September 17, 2025 at 3:12 PM
"Your hope worked! I'm at nitty-gritty finish line stuff. The way I'm comparing sums of collections of residuals here is totally novel, off-the-beaten-path, and giving results. "Hence" brilliant :P." #perfectnumber #oddperfectnumber #numbertheory #math
Okay this time I fucking got it. And a whole lot more unnecessary stuff – ha. But see the product of all the exponents is the number of individual residuals, assigning the modularity of the numerator... then you've got a problem. #perfectnumber #oddperfectnumber
September 17, 2025 at 11:43 AM
Okay this time I fucking got it. And a whole lot more unnecessary stuff – ha. But see the product of all the exponents is the number of individual residuals, assigning the modularity of the numerator... then you've got a problem. #perfectnumber #oddperfectnumber
Behold: the proof that an odd number cannot be a #perfectnumber. And you, sir, are an odd number.
September 15, 2025 at 6:47 PM
Behold: the proof that an odd number cannot be a #perfectnumber. And you, sir, are an odd number.
The state of the universe is on a maximally integrable classical trajectory; the local freedom-resistant, spatially graduated frame rate collection at which that is observed determines history.
September 6, 2025 at 9:05 AM
The state of the universe is on a maximally integrable classical trajectory; the local freedom-resistant, spatially graduated frame rate collection at which that is observed determines history.
I'd like to read the proof of the Löwenheim–Skolem theorem and then to reconstruct Cantor's argument within the countable ZFC model constructed explicitly according to the directions of the proof, to see whether Skolem's argument is the best...
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Skolem%...
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Skolem%...
Skolem's paradox - Wikipedia
en.m.wikipedia.org
September 2, 2025 at 12:17 AM
I'd like to read the proof of the Löwenheim–Skolem theorem and then to reconstruct Cantor's argument within the countable ZFC model constructed explicitly according to the directions of the proof, to see whether Skolem's argument is the best...
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Skolem%...
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Skolem%...
So the question now is, where did I break from ZFC in proving this? Because it's supposed to be unprovable within the ZFC framework. Was it, perhaps, by noting the strings referring to the values? #continuumhypothesis #generalizedcontinuumhypothesis
September 1, 2025 at 10:20 PM
So the question now is, where did I break from ZFC in proving this? Because it's supposed to be unprovable within the ZFC framework. Was it, perhaps, by noting the strings referring to the values? #continuumhypothesis #generalizedcontinuumhypothesis
Hypothesis has to be true. If there's a set with greater cardinality than Aleph-0, I'm making more than finitely many =< Aleph-0 choices to identify at least one (hence at least ...) point. I can always order the choices I'm making, and each choice is always amongst at least two options, ...
September 1, 2025 at 5:39 PM
Hypothesis has to be true. If there's a set with greater cardinality than Aleph-0, I'm making more than finitely many =< Aleph-0 choices to identify at least one (hence at least ...) point. I can always order the choices I'm making, and each choice is always amongst at least two options, ...
The correct question is, what is the cardinality if the set of points whose expressions base 2 include an increasing density of "1s" in the first m, then the next 2m, then the next 4m, then the next 8m, etc., digits, for at least one m in Z?
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Continu...
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Continu...
Continuum hypothesis - Wikipedia
en.m.wikipedia.org
September 1, 2025 at 4:58 PM
The correct question is, what is the cardinality if the set of points whose expressions base 2 include an increasing density of "1s" in the first m, then the next 2m, then the next 4m, then the next 8m, etc., digits, for at least one m in Z?
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Continu...
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Continu...
Hm. What is the cardinality if the set of points whose expressions base 2 include an increasing density of "1s" in the first ten, then the next hundred, then the next thousand, then the next ten thousand, etc., digits?
September 1, 2025 at 4:47 PM
Hm. What is the cardinality if the set of points whose expressions base 2 include an increasing density of "1s" in the first ten, then the next hundred, then the next thousand, then the next ten thousand, etc., digits?
Quasi-continuous function on (0,1): f(x) = x, except where the expression base 2 has every-other digit swapped with the prior digit. Less continuous than R\Q because discontinuities exist everywhere upon a continuous space of definiton and not just on Q. "Automeris i/o."
#continuumhypothesis
#continuumhypothesis
August 31, 2025 at 6:11 AM
Quasi-continuous function on (0,1): f(x) = x, except where the expression base 2 has every-other digit swapped with the prior digit. Less continuous than R\Q because discontinuities exist everywhere upon a continuous space of definiton and not just on Q. "Automeris i/o."
#continuumhypothesis
#continuumhypothesis
Quasi-continuous function on (0,1): f(x) = x, except where the expression base 2 has every-other digit swapped with the prior digit.
August 31, 2025 at 6:00 AM
Quasi-continuous function on (0,1): f(x) = x, except where the expression base 2 has every-other digit swapped with the prior digit.
Quantum effects start to dominate its macro-boundary warping when a fluid is pushed through a minimally collapsing puncture.
That legitimately took a long-ass time to figure out.
That legitimately took a long-ass time to figure out.
August 28, 2025 at 5:13 AM
Quantum effects start to dominate its macro-boundary warping when a fluid is pushed through a minimally collapsing puncture.
That legitimately took a long-ass time to figure out.
That legitimately took a long-ass time to figure out.