trailblazermark.bsky.social
@trailblazermark.bsky.social
..." And then they came for me..."
May 5, 2025 at 6:34 PM
@booker.senate.gov Great speech!!
April 2, 2025 at 12:38 AM
,,, @lawrenceodonnell.msnbc.com, @maddow.msnbc.com, @chrislhayes.bsky.social ...Why Canada as one state? WATER!!!
Trump can not touch GREAT LAKES water because of a sovereign Canada. If it's a STATE, Trump cronies can RAPE the Great Lakes of water and pipe it to Southwest land DEVELOPMENT!!!
February 27, 2025 at 3:48 AM
To @lawrenceodonnell.msnbc.com O'Donnell:
To @maddow.msnbc.com Maddow:
To @chrislhayes.bsky.social Hayes:

All of those addressed above have commented on the insanity of Donald Trump's desire to annex Canada as the 51st state. NOT 14 provinces as 14 new states, but all Canada-ONE state. Why?...
February 27, 2025 at 3:34 AM
@lawrenceodonnell.msnbc.com Why does everyone at MSNBC refuse to point out that the UNITED STATES POST OFFICE comes under Article I of the US Constitution, not Article II ? Section 8 states clearly,
"The CONGRESS shall have power to establish Post Offices and Post Roads..."
February 22, 2025 at 3:17 AM
@maddow.msnbc.com Why has no one pointed out that TRUMP has no authority over the USPS.
Read:
Article I of the US CONSTITUTION; Section 9: The CONGRESS shall have power to establish Post Offices and Post Roads.
February 22, 2025 at 3:09 AM
...FURTHER, IAW Judge Bates' memo acknowledging DOGE as an "Agency", Federal statutes (5 USC 904) require that any non-competitive administrator of an agency be proposed to and approved by the Senate. THEREFORE, Elon Musk is acting illegally and all actions to date should be null and void.
February 15, 2025 at 5:36 PM
Federal judge Bates acknowledged that DOGE is, in fact, acting as an agency. If so Federal Law (5 USC 903 & 5 USC 905) require that any reorganizing of a department or agency be proposed to and approved by Senate and House. This has not been done. Therefore, DOGE is actually illegal... See more...
February 15, 2025 at 5:29 PM
@maddow.msnbc.bsky.social The DOGE is an ILLEGAL ENTITY!!
5 USC 905
Forbids forming an agency w/o filing for it thru Congress & getting approval!!
MUSK is ILLEGAL! Felonious computer crimes!!
44 USC 3501, §§511 & 513
Forbids unauthorized computer access.
18 USC 2701 electronic communication
February 13, 2025 at 4:18 PM
@lawrenceodonnell.msnbc.bsky.com: The DOGE is in direct violation of federal law. No department or agency can be formed w/o filing thru Congress and approval thereof.
5 USC 905. MUSK is illegal!!!
His computer info thefts are FELONIOUS criminal acts.
WHERE IS THE PRESS?
WHERE IS THE OUTCRY??
February 13, 2025 at 4:02 PM
@lawrenceodonnell.msnbc.bsky.social
February 13, 2025 at 3:52 PM
@chrislhayes.bsky.social
Why is no one calling attention to the fact that DOGE is an illegal entity?? Federal law expressly forbids formation of any such dept. or agency without filing a reorganizing plan with Congress and having both houses approved it!! 5 USC 905
WHERE IS THE PRESS & OUTCRY??
February 13, 2025 at 3:47 PM
@maddow.msnbc.com
@lawrenceodonnell.msnbc.com
@chrislhayes.bsky.social

In addition to allowing uncertified felonious thugs into Treas Computer, they are violating PII control (SSN, DOB, wages, etc) If not accessed for taxation reasons, then each individual affected MUST BE NOTIFIED!! FELONY!!
February 6, 2025 at 2:43 AM
@maddow.msnbc.com
@lawrenceodonnell.msnbc.com
@chrislhayes.bsky.social
Musk actions are not only illegal but also unconstitutional.
Art. I, Sec 9, Treasury clause
Note: DJT has only authority to appoint Treas head.
Treasury is otherwise the domain of Congress.
February 6, 2025 at 2:31 AM
@maddow.msnbc.com
@lawrenceodonnell.msnbc.com

YES, Laws are being broken!!!
Read:
44 US Code, sec 3501
(Public Law 107-347)
Violation is a Class E felony:
5 years / $25000 fine

44 USC 3554
Federal Agency Responsibility

18 USC 2701
Unlawful Access to Docs
20 years in prison/ $1,000,000 fine.
February 6, 2025 at 2:26 AM
@maddow.msnbc.com
RE: Birthright Citizenship -- Amend XIV says child of immigrant born on US soil is citizen. Trump says NO. Claims there is question due to "jurisdiction" clause.
POINT: If lack of jurisdiction applies to child, then also applies to PARENT. Therefore can't be deported!!
January 27, 2025 at 3:22 AM
New Topic:
Citizenship Birthright.

Are children of immigrants actually citizens if born on US soil?
It appears that MAGA is trying to make the absurd case that the Amendment XIV clause can be questioned due to the requirement that they be "subject to the jurisdiction of the UNITED STATES...
January 27, 2025 at 2:57 AM
Reposted
Mad men…
December 20, 2024 at 7:46 PM
Reposted
I'm going to post this video every day so we never forget
December 1, 2024 at 6:54 PM