It's already FDA-cleared. Already generating patient outcomes.
But what caught my attention isn't the tech—it's the timing 🧵
It's already FDA-cleared. Already generating patient outcomes.
But what caught my attention isn't the tech—it's the timing 🧵
But the interesting part isn't the price tag—it's the timeline.
They're committing to commercial deployments in 2026 and series production by 2028.
That's not R&D. That's a product roadmap 🧵
But the interesting part isn't the price tag—it's the timeline.
They're committing to commercial deployments in 2026 and series production by 2028.
That's not R&D. That's a product roadmap 🧵
But the real story from CES 2026: Hyundai just committed to manufacturing 30,000 units annually by 2028.
That's not a pilot. That's a production bet. 🧵
But the real story from CES 2026: Hyundai just committed to manufacturing 30,000 units annually by 2028.
That's not a pilot. That's a production bet. 🧵
But I think the story isn't the chip—it's the timing.
When smartphone giants pivot serious resources toward robotics, it signals something changed. Here's what I see 🧵
But I think the story isn't the chip—it's the timing.
When smartphone giants pivot serious resources toward robotics, it signals something changed. Here's what I see 🧵
But the real story isn't the speed—it's that this flips the economics of flexible automation.
Here's why that matters 🧵
But the real story isn't the speed—it's that this flips the economics of flexible automation.
Here's why that matters 🧵
It's not humanoid at all—and that's exactly the point.
China's 2026 strategy isn't about making robots look human. It's about winning on price and function 🧵
It's not humanoid at all—and that's exactly the point.
China's 2026 strategy isn't about making robots look human. It's about winning on price and function 🧵
This wasn't a demo. It was actual patient care with regulatory approval.
But I think the real story is what didn't happen 🧵
This wasn't a demo. It was actual patient care with regulatory approval.
But I think the real story is what didn't happen 🧵
City University of Hong Kong just published this, and I think it matters more than the headlines suggest.
Here's why 🧵
City University of Hong Kong just published this, and I think it matters more than the headlines suggest.
Here's why 🧵
Not new factories. Not labs. Existing plants that weren't designed for robots.
I think this is the smartest humanoid strategy I've seen. Here's why 🧵
Not new factories. Not labs. Existing plants that weren't designed for robots.
I think this is the smartest humanoid strategy I've seen. Here's why 🧵
But the bigger shift is factories being redesigned for robots—eliminating lights, climate control, and 30-40% of floor space built for humans.
I think we're underestimating how fast this happens 🧵
But the bigger shift is factories being redesigned for robots—eliminating lights, climate control, and 30-40% of floor space built for humans.
I think we're underestimating how fast this happens 🧵
The US? 1,561.
But the real story isn't the 5-to-1 ratio—it's what it does to your unit economics if you're building humanoids outside China.
🧵
The US? 1,561.
But the real story isn't the 5-to-1 ratio—it's what it does to your unit economics if you're building humanoids outside China.
🧵
99% success rate on high-voltage testing. Not a demo. Not a pilot.
This is the deployment everyone's been waiting for—but I think the tech choices matter more than the milestone 🧵
99% success rate on high-voltage testing. Not a demo. Not a pilot.
This is the deployment everyone's been waiting for—but I think the tech choices matter more than the milestone 🧵
Foundation isn't hiding it—they want their robots to be "deadly, not docile."
This crosses a line the entire industry has avoided. Here's why it matters 🧵
Foundation isn't hiding it—they want their robots to be "deadly, not docile."
This crosses a line the entire industry has avoided. Here's why it matters 🧵
His argument: hundreds of millions are being spent on vision-based training that ignores the fundamental dexterity problem.
I think he's right—and the data backs him up 🧵
His argument: hundreds of millions are being spent on vision-based training that ignores the fundamental dexterity problem.
I think he's right—and the data backs him up 🧵
Caltech's X1 just solved it by doing something I haven't seen work before—autonomous switching between walking, flying, and rolling. 🧵
Caltech's X1 just solved it by doing something I haven't seen work before—autonomous switching between walking, flying, and rolling. 🧵