Tazzlie
@tazziedaze.bsky.social
Defending yourself and providing proof of what others say about you is never illegal or wrong. You do not owe silence to people who try to intimidate you with demands or childish tantrums.
Pinned
Meet the real girl behind these apps with links all the same pattern Katie Shelby (Katlynn Moore Wolfgirlkatlynn)
www.facebook.com/share/1DpDAH...
www.facebook.com/share/17vTpJ...
www.facebook.com/share/1849C6...
www.facebook.com/share/1UpCM3...
www.facebook.com/share/16KFXM...
www.facebook.com/share/1DpDAH...
www.facebook.com/share/17vTpJ...
www.facebook.com/share/1849C6...
www.facebook.com/share/1UpCM3...
www.facebook.com/share/16KFXM...
If you have an issue handle it directly or remove yourself. Screenshotting posts and circling back to create drama isn’t productive, and it’s not mature. You’ve been asked to disengage. Respect that boundary. Block us. Move on. Stop monitoring content that has nothing to do with you.
This ends here.
This ends here.
February 2, 2026 at 2:03 AM
If you have an issue handle it directly or remove yourself. Screenshotting posts and circling back to create drama isn’t productive, and it’s not mature. You’ve been asked to disengage. Respect that boundary. Block us. Move on. Stop monitoring content that has nothing to do with you.
This ends here.
This ends here.
Ms. Katie S.
I was aware of the fake X account that was created of me by you. My people had it reported and flagged for impersonation, and the appropriate steps have been taken to address it through the platform and was deleted.
I was aware of the fake X account that was created of me by you. My people had it reported and flagged for impersonation, and the appropriate steps have been taken to address it through the platform and was deleted.
February 1, 2026 at 5:16 PM
Ms. Katie S.
I was aware of the fake X account that was created of me by you. My people had it reported and flagged for impersonation, and the appropriate steps have been taken to address it through the platform and was deleted.
I was aware of the fake X account that was created of me by you. My people had it reported and flagged for impersonation, and the appropriate steps have been taken to address it through the platform and was deleted.
Ms Katie S
Some of us with high functioning autism are highly intelligent and capable far beyond what you assume I dont need to justify my life culture belief or personal life to you I will not answer to insults stereotypes or your projections nicely but back at you how i see you treat me
Some of us with high functioning autism are highly intelligent and capable far beyond what you assume I dont need to justify my life culture belief or personal life to you I will not answer to insults stereotypes or your projections nicely but back at you how i see you treat me
February 1, 2026 at 4:48 PM
Ms Katie S
Some of us with high functioning autism are highly intelligent and capable far beyond what you assume I dont need to justify my life culture belief or personal life to you I will not answer to insults stereotypes or your projections nicely but back at you how i see you treat me
Some of us with high functioning autism are highly intelligent and capable far beyond what you assume I dont need to justify my life culture belief or personal life to you I will not answer to insults stereotypes or your projections nicely but back at you how i see you treat me
Ms. Katie S
You have issued threats labeled me with diagnoses used derogatory language without any professional authority or knowledge of my medical or cultural background I defend myself you escalate by continuing what you want me to stop doing while posting about me making yourself the fake victim
You have issued threats labeled me with diagnoses used derogatory language without any professional authority or knowledge of my medical or cultural background I defend myself you escalate by continuing what you want me to stop doing while posting about me making yourself the fake victim
February 1, 2026 at 4:39 PM
Ms. Katie S
You have issued threats labeled me with diagnoses used derogatory language without any professional authority or knowledge of my medical or cultural background I defend myself you escalate by continuing what you want me to stop doing while posting about me making yourself the fake victim
You have issued threats labeled me with diagnoses used derogatory language without any professional authority or knowledge of my medical or cultural background I defend myself you escalate by continuing what you want me to stop doing while posting about me making yourself the fake victim
You’ve been “issuing notices” for months. If you had a case, you’d file it. At this point it’s not a warning it’s a broken script.
February 1, 2026 at 4:11 PM
You’ve been “issuing notices” for months. If you had a case, you’d file it. At this point it’s not a warning it’s a broken script.
You don’t get to issue gag orders because your feelings are hurt.
If you had real authority, you’d use it not cosplay it in a message and call it law.
If you had real authority, you’d use it not cosplay it in a message and call it law.
February 1, 2026 at 4:09 PM
You don’t get to issue gag orders because your feelings are hurt.
If you had real authority, you’d use it not cosplay it in a message and call it law.
If you had real authority, you’d use it not cosplay it in a message and call it law.
Repeating “evidentiary standpoint” doesn’t automatically invalidate what people can plainly observe. Geography does not suspend logic, and it doesn’t erase documented behavior. Being in another country limits physical access, yes it does not prohibit analysis of publicly available information.
February 1, 2026 at 4:08 PM
Repeating “evidentiary standpoint” doesn’t automatically invalidate what people can plainly observe. Geography does not suspend logic, and it doesn’t erase documented behavior. Being in another country limits physical access, yes it does not prohibit analysis of publicly available information.
From a behavioral and evidentiary standpoint you mean from the comfort of your armchair jurisdiction? And repeating “assumptions aren’t evidence” like it’s a courtroom drama doesn’t make you the judge. If you were actually secure in “the truth,” you wouldn’t need a signature line to sell it.
February 1, 2026 at 4:07 PM
From a behavioral and evidentiary standpoint you mean from the comfort of your armchair jurisdiction? And repeating “assumptions aren’t evidence” like it’s a courtroom drama doesn’t make you the judge. If you were actually secure in “the truth,” you wouldn’t need a signature line to sell it.
Oh, now geography determines credibility? Interesting upgrade to the rulebook.
So because someone lives in another country, facts suddenly expire at the border?
If the argument can’t stand on its own, just say that. Don’t pretend distance magically turns documented behavior into “speculation.”
So because someone lives in another country, facts suddenly expire at the border?
If the argument can’t stand on its own, just say that. Don’t pretend distance magically turns documented behavior into “speculation.”
February 1, 2026 at 4:05 PM
Oh, now geography determines credibility? Interesting upgrade to the rulebook.
So because someone lives in another country, facts suddenly expire at the border?
If the argument can’t stand on its own, just say that. Don’t pretend distance magically turns documented behavior into “speculation.”
So because someone lives in another country, facts suddenly expire at the border?
If the argument can’t stand on its own, just say that. Don’t pretend distance magically turns documented behavior into “speculation.”
Repeating “verifiable evidence” doesn’t make you the referee of reality. If you actually had the moral high ground, you wouldn’t need to police the narrative this hard. That’s not responsibility that’s damage control.
February 1, 2026 at 4:03 PM
Repeating “verifiable evidence” doesn’t make you the referee of reality. If you actually had the moral high ground, you wouldn’t need to police the narrative this hard. That’s not responsibility that’s damage control.
Oh please. “Neutral and analytical” while running ChatGPT PR for one side? That’s not objectivity that’s selective outrage with a clipboard.
If you want facts and accountability, apply them evenly. Otherwise this is just control dressed up as ethics.
If you want facts and accountability, apply them evenly. Otherwise this is just control dressed up as ethics.
February 1, 2026 at 4:02 PM
Oh please. “Neutral and analytical” while running ChatGPT PR for one side? That’s not objectivity that’s selective outrage with a clipboard.
If you want facts and accountability, apply them evenly. Otherwise this is just control dressed up as ethics.
If you want facts and accountability, apply them evenly. Otherwise this is just control dressed up as ethics.
Lynn is the one being dragged here also. There are posts dated back to 2007 that’s not stalking, that’s archived history. Let’s stop pretending timestamps are crimes. If anyone’s obsessively digging and weaponizing old content, that’s Katie trying to make Lynn look bad.
January 31, 2026 at 10:32 PM
Lynn is the one being dragged here also. There are posts dated back to 2007 that’s not stalking, that’s archived history. Let’s stop pretending timestamps are crimes. If anyone’s obsessively digging and weaponizing old content, that’s Katie trying to make Lynn look bad.
This isn’t strategic
It’s someone fantasizing about being a courtroom closer in a Twitter argument.
All the airtigh, lethal corporate compliance would nod That’s ego padding If something is truly solid it doesn’t need a hype man narrating how devastating it is
That’s not analysis that’s selfsoothing
It’s someone fantasizing about being a courtroom closer in a Twitter argument.
All the airtigh, lethal corporate compliance would nod That’s ego padding If something is truly solid it doesn’t need a hype man narrating how devastating it is
That’s not analysis that’s selfsoothing
January 31, 2026 at 9:36 PM
This isn’t strategic
It’s someone fantasizing about being a courtroom closer in a Twitter argument.
All the airtigh, lethal corporate compliance would nod That’s ego padding If something is truly solid it doesn’t need a hype man narrating how devastating it is
That’s not analysis that’s selfsoothing
It’s someone fantasizing about being a courtroom closer in a Twitter argument.
All the airtigh, lethal corporate compliance would nod That’s ego padding If something is truly solid it doesn’t need a hype man narrating how devastating it is
That’s not analysis that’s selfsoothing
This isn’t strategy. It’s cosplay psychology. If your argument needs a dramatic monologue about “control pivots” and “containment,” it’s not strong it’s insecure. Facts don’t need narration. They just stand there.
January 31, 2026 at 9:33 PM
This isn’t strategy. It’s cosplay psychology. If your argument needs a dramatic monologue about “control pivots” and “containment,” it’s not strong it’s insecure. Facts don’t need narration. They just stand there.
Oh this is rich a full boardroom presentation about “control theater” from someone who treats every disagreement like a hostile takeover.
“Invisible accountability” isn’t a thing. It’s just you rebranding “I don’t like what you said” into a moral emergency.
“Invisible accountability” isn’t a thing. It’s just you rebranding “I don’t like what you said” into a moral emergency.
January 31, 2026 at 4:53 PM
Oh this is rich a full boardroom presentation about “control theater” from someone who treats every disagreement like a hostile takeover.
“Invisible accountability” isn’t a thing. It’s just you rebranding “I don’t like what you said” into a moral emergency.
“Invisible accountability” isn’t a thing. It’s just you rebranding “I don’t like what you said” into a moral emergency.
You can’t demand accountability from people who didn’t harm you bold statement from someone who manufactures the conflict and then plays referee.
You don’t get to light the match, call it “truth,” and then accuse everyone else of arson. If there’s no harm, why are you constantly escalating?
You don’t get to light the match, call it “truth,” and then accuse everyone else of arson. If there’s no harm, why are you constantly escalating?
January 31, 2026 at 4:52 PM
You can’t demand accountability from people who didn’t harm you bold statement from someone who manufactures the conflict and then plays referee.
You don’t get to light the match, call it “truth,” and then accuse everyone else of arson. If there’s no harm, why are you constantly escalating?
You don’t get to light the match, call it “truth,” and then accuse everyone else of arson. If there’s no harm, why are you constantly escalating?
You really typed out a full behavioral flow chart like you’re narrating a nature documentary It just makes it look like you Googled two psychology articles now your the Discovery Channel of dysfunction No diagnosis required Because what this really requires is less commentary and more actual silence
January 31, 2026 at 4:50 PM
You really typed out a full behavioral flow chart like you’re narrating a nature documentary It just makes it look like you Googled two psychology articles now your the Discovery Channel of dysfunction No diagnosis required Because what this really requires is less commentary and more actual silence
Calling that “neutral” is hilarious. It sounds like you pulled a psychology degree out of a cracker jack box and decided to start diagnosing strangers.
All those clinical buzzwords don’t make it objective they just make it longer. It’s still a rant, just wearing a lab coat from Party City.
All those clinical buzzwords don’t make it objective they just make it longer. It’s still a rant, just wearing a lab coat from Party City.
January 31, 2026 at 4:47 PM
Calling that “neutral” is hilarious. It sounds like you pulled a psychology degree out of a cracker jack box and decided to start diagnosing strangers.
All those clinical buzzwords don’t make it objective they just make it longer. It’s still a rant, just wearing a lab coat from Party City.
All those clinical buzzwords don’t make it objective they just make it longer. It’s still a rant, just wearing a lab coat from Party City.
Neutral factual and nonconfrontational is wild when it reads like a courtroom closing statement typed with clenched teeth You dont get to call something neutral just because you wrapped it in clinical buzzwords If it were truly neutral it wont need a selfreview at the endexplaining how neutral it is
January 31, 2026 at 4:46 PM
Neutral factual and nonconfrontational is wild when it reads like a courtroom closing statement typed with clenched teeth You dont get to call something neutral just because you wrapped it in clinical buzzwords If it were truly neutral it wont need a selfreview at the endexplaining how neutral it is
Oh good, another TED Talk on “projection.” Nothing says “I’m totally not doing this” like a full academic monologue about it.
If you need a lecture to prove you’re innocent, you’re probably not.
If you need a lecture to prove you’re innocent, you’re probably not.
January 31, 2026 at 4:44 PM
Oh good, another TED Talk on “projection.” Nothing says “I’m totally not doing this” like a full academic monologue about it.
If you need a lecture to prove you’re innocent, you’re probably not.
If you need a lecture to prove you’re innocent, you’re probably not.
If you were really disengaging, you wouldn’t need to announce it. Boundaries aren’t press releases they’re silence. If you’re still explaining it, you’re still involved.
January 31, 2026 at 4:42 PM
If you were really disengaging, you wouldn’t need to announce it. Boundaries aren’t press releases they’re silence. If you’re still explaining it, you’re still involved.
You don’t get to preach “leave me alone” while stalking, posting, and baiting.
That’s not a boundary that’s obsession with a vocabulary problem.
If you wanted peace, you’d be quiet. Instead, you’re still watching.
That’s not a boundary that’s obsession with a vocabulary problem.
If you wanted peace, you’d be quiet. Instead, you’re still watching.
January 31, 2026 at 4:41 PM
You don’t get to preach “leave me alone” while stalking, posting, and baiting.
That’s not a boundary that’s obsession with a vocabulary problem.
If you wanted peace, you’d be quiet. Instead, you’re still watching.
That’s not a boundary that’s obsession with a vocabulary problem.
If you wanted peace, you’d be quiet. Instead, you’re still watching.
Oh no, thank you for bravely explaining that AI isn’t an alter. Truly revolutionary stuff.
The facts are fine it’s the dramatic “mental health lecture tour” energy that’s doing the most.
The facts are fine it’s the dramatic “mental health lecture tour” energy that’s doing the most.
January 31, 2026 at 4:40 PM
Oh no, thank you for bravely explaining that AI isn’t an alter. Truly revolutionary stuff.
The facts are fine it’s the dramatic “mental health lecture tour” energy that’s doing the most.
The facts are fine it’s the dramatic “mental health lecture tour” energy that’s doing the most.
That’s not intimidating Its desperate The only people who say you cant escape us are the ones terrified of being irrelevant If your whole identity depends on forcing your presence into my life that’s not power that’s obsession And obsession isnt strength It’s insecurity screaming
January 31, 2026 at 1:42 PM
That’s not intimidating Its desperate The only people who say you cant escape us are the ones terrified of being irrelevant If your whole identity depends on forcing your presence into my life that’s not power that’s obsession And obsession isnt strength It’s insecurity screaming
You love the chaos when you think you’re in control. The second you’re exposed, you vanish and hate everyone. That’s not growth that’s cowardice. Everyone sees it.
January 31, 2026 at 1:40 PM
You love the chaos when you think you’re in control. The second you’re exposed, you vanish and hate everyone. That’s not growth that’s cowardice. Everyone sees it.