Tanner Campbell
@tannerocampbell.com
🧑🧑🧒 Family man
🏛️ Philosopher of Stoicism
🔎 Google famous
🏛️ Philosopher of Stoicism
🔎 Google famous
My wife always be like, “let’s eat better. Less snackies in the house.”
But the grocery haul always be like…
But the grocery haul always be like…
January 12, 2026 at 8:07 AM
My wife always be like, “let’s eat better. Less snackies in the house.”
But the grocery haul always be like…
But the grocery haul always be like…
Reposted by Tanner Campbell
Marcus Aurelius has been acknowledged as a sage. But his reign was marked as much by military affairs as it was by philosophy. on.wsj.com/49xQe0K
‘Marcus Aurelius’ Review: The Mind and the Sword
Marcus Aurelius has been acknowledged as a sage. But his reign was marked as much by military affairs as it was by philosophy.
on.wsj.com
January 11, 2026 at 3:24 PM
Marcus Aurelius has been acknowledged as a sage. But his reign was marked as much by military affairs as it was by philosophy. on.wsj.com/49xQe0K
Currently reading 📚
It's not Stoicism, but it sure provides indirect commentary on why our abandonment of virtue ethics has practically destroyed philosophy in academia.
At least, that's what I'm getting out of it thus far and where I think it's going.
It's not Stoicism, but it sure provides indirect commentary on why our abandonment of virtue ethics has practically destroyed philosophy in academia.
At least, that's what I'm getting out of it thus far and where I think it's going.
January 11, 2026 at 6:55 PM
Currently reading 📚
It's not Stoicism, but it sure provides indirect commentary on why our abandonment of virtue ethics has practically destroyed philosophy in academia.
At least, that's what I'm getting out of it thus far and where I think it's going.
It's not Stoicism, but it sure provides indirect commentary on why our abandonment of virtue ethics has practically destroyed philosophy in academia.
At least, that's what I'm getting out of it thus far and where I think it's going.
📌 Welcome to the Clean Stoicism feed 📌
I'm a public philosopher. I specialise in Stoic philosophy.
Only actually Stoic material will be allowed in the feed.
The following will be moderated out:
⟐ Images
⟐ Reposts
⟐ Quote-porn
⟐ Bro-icism (red-pilled, etc)
Support: @ me
Podcast: stoicismpod.com
I'm a public philosopher. I specialise in Stoic philosophy.
Only actually Stoic material will be allowed in the feed.
The following will be moderated out:
⟐ Images
⟐ Reposts
⟐ Quote-porn
⟐ Bro-icism (red-pilled, etc)
Support: @ me
Podcast: stoicismpod.com
Practical Stoicism | Stoicism Podcast for Modern Life
Join American philosopher Tanner Campbell for practical Stoic wisdom applied to modern life. Learn how to live excellently through ancient Greek philosophy.
stoicismpod.com
January 10, 2026 at 10:07 PM
📌 Welcome to the Clean Stoicism feed 📌
I'm a public philosopher. I specialise in Stoic philosophy.
Only actually Stoic material will be allowed in the feed.
The following will be moderated out:
⟐ Images
⟐ Reposts
⟐ Quote-porn
⟐ Bro-icism (red-pilled, etc)
Support: @ me
Podcast: stoicismpod.com
I'm a public philosopher. I specialise in Stoic philosophy.
Only actually Stoic material will be allowed in the feed.
The following will be moderated out:
⟐ Images
⟐ Reposts
⟐ Quote-porn
⟐ Bro-icism (red-pilled, etc)
Support: @ me
Podcast: stoicismpod.com
I think it’s time for a proper opposition.
President Trump declared on Wednesday evening that his power as commander in chief is constrained only by his “own morality,” brushing aside international law and other checks on his ability to use military might to strike, invade or coerce nations around the world.
www.nytimes.com/2026/01/08/u...
www.nytimes.com/2026/01/08/u...
Trump Lays Out a Vision of Power Restrained Only by ‘My Own Morality’
www.nytimes.com
January 9, 2026 at 4:05 PM
I think it’s time for a proper opposition.
Ha. So far!
@tannerocampbell.com enters dangerous territory here, #stoic advice about dealing with spouses(!), but emerges unscathed.
I've received many questions about what to do when our spouse isn't #Stoic -- and by that, I hope what everyone means is that their spouse doesn't subscribe to Stoic ethical theory (or theory in general). I have thoughts, I'll share a few now.
January 9, 2026 at 2:40 PM
Ha. So far!
"Is it easier if you're both Stoic."
Yes, of course it is. Of course it's easier when you're both on the same page (in concerns to anything).
But, again, challenge, or individual differences, aren't a reason to abandon a relationship.
Your mom isn't Stoic. Your sister or brother. Your dad. Etc.
Yes, of course it is. Of course it's easier when you're both on the same page (in concerns to anything).
But, again, challenge, or individual differences, aren't a reason to abandon a relationship.
Your mom isn't Stoic. Your sister or brother. Your dad. Etc.
January 9, 2026 at 9:36 AM
"Is it easier if you're both Stoic."
Yes, of course it is. Of course it's easier when you're both on the same page (in concerns to anything).
But, again, challenge, or individual differences, aren't a reason to abandon a relationship.
Your mom isn't Stoic. Your sister or brother. Your dad. Etc.
Yes, of course it is. Of course it's easier when you're both on the same page (in concerns to anything).
But, again, challenge, or individual differences, aren't a reason to abandon a relationship.
Your mom isn't Stoic. Your sister or brother. Your dad. Etc.
Ah, and then: "Is divorce Stoic?"
The answer is, it depends.
A Stoic doesn't tuck tail and run the moment he or she runs into friction.
If you've not really tried, I would say divorce is a pretty un-Stoic route.
If, on the other hand, you have tried, genuinely, then divorce could be Just.
The answer is, it depends.
A Stoic doesn't tuck tail and run the moment he or she runs into friction.
If you've not really tried, I would say divorce is a pretty un-Stoic route.
If, on the other hand, you have tried, genuinely, then divorce could be Just.
January 9, 2026 at 9:34 AM
Ah, and then: "Is divorce Stoic?"
The answer is, it depends.
A Stoic doesn't tuck tail and run the moment he or she runs into friction.
If you've not really tried, I would say divorce is a pretty un-Stoic route.
If, on the other hand, you have tried, genuinely, then divorce could be Just.
The answer is, it depends.
A Stoic doesn't tuck tail and run the moment he or she runs into friction.
If you've not really tried, I would say divorce is a pretty un-Stoic route.
If, on the other hand, you have tried, genuinely, then divorce could be Just.
So, to review:
1. Partner doesn't need to be a Stoic
2. Partner may well be right, and you should be willing to be wrong
3. Be firm in your practice, and explain your reasoning when asked
4. Don't try to "teach them" (unless it's through example)
5. Don't badmouth them to your kids
6. Let them grow
1. Partner doesn't need to be a Stoic
2. Partner may well be right, and you should be willing to be wrong
3. Be firm in your practice, and explain your reasoning when asked
4. Don't try to "teach them" (unless it's through example)
5. Don't badmouth them to your kids
6. Let them grow
January 9, 2026 at 9:27 AM
So, to review:
1. Partner doesn't need to be a Stoic
2. Partner may well be right, and you should be willing to be wrong
3. Be firm in your practice, and explain your reasoning when asked
4. Don't try to "teach them" (unless it's through example)
5. Don't badmouth them to your kids
6. Let them grow
1. Partner doesn't need to be a Stoic
2. Partner may well be right, and you should be willing to be wrong
3. Be firm in your practice, and explain your reasoning when asked
4. Don't try to "teach them" (unless it's through example)
5. Don't badmouth them to your kids
6. Let them grow
...they may, in a few years, mature, change, become better people, and if you've planted an unjust and evil visage of them in your kids, then you've made it harder for your partner to have a healthy relationship with your children. Don't do that. This is seen a lot in divorces. This is unjust.
January 9, 2026 at 9:27 AM
...they may, in a few years, mature, change, become better people, and if you've planted an unjust and evil visage of them in your kids, then you've made it harder for your partner to have a healthy relationship with your children. Don't do that. This is seen a lot in divorces. This is unjust.
...instead, you set an example. You keep a cool head, you keep a fair and Just measure. If your partner presents a danger to the kids, you get them out of harms way but you don't do it in a way that demonises the other parent.
This is important because your partner is on a journey same as you...
This is important because your partner is on a journey same as you...
January 9, 2026 at 9:27 AM
...instead, you set an example. You keep a cool head, you keep a fair and Just measure. If your partner presents a danger to the kids, you get them out of harms way but you don't do it in a way that demonises the other parent.
This is important because your partner is on a journey same as you...
This is important because your partner is on a journey same as you...
Lastly, and this is critical if you have children, you must be a consistent human being with your kids and you cannot say things to them than diminish their other parent... that is unjust. If your partner throws an emotional hissy fit, you don't tell the kids their mom/dad is crazy...
January 9, 2026 at 9:27 AM
Lastly, and this is critical if you have children, you must be a consistent human being with your kids and you cannot say things to them than diminish their other parent... that is unjust. If your partner throws an emotional hissy fit, you don't tell the kids their mom/dad is crazy...
Then, we should always be willing, when asked, to explain our reasoning. Just because we might view our partner as irrational, doesn't mean we're right. Even if we are right, irrational people can arrive at valid and rational conclusions. We should be willing to explain AND be challenged.
January 9, 2026 at 9:27 AM
Then, we should always be willing, when asked, to explain our reasoning. Just because we might view our partner as irrational, doesn't mean we're right. Even if we are right, irrational people can arrive at valid and rational conclusions. We should be willing to explain AND be challenged.
Next, because we believe they are wrong we may be tempted to attempt to correct them. I advise against this. Instead, we should be firm in our positions and not waver, so long as our positions are, as we reason them to be Just. We do not leave our path in order to appease our partners.
January 9, 2026 at 9:27 AM
Next, because we believe they are wrong we may be tempted to attempt to correct them. I advise against this. Instead, we should be firm in our positions and not waver, so long as our positions are, as we reason them to be Just. We do not leave our path in order to appease our partners.
What I have found to be the Just response is to accept that whatever philosophical journey they are on, and destination they work towards, is entirely their choice. They are making those choices because the believe they are the right choices to make so, if they're wrong, they don't know it.
January 9, 2026 at 9:27 AM
What I have found to be the Just response is to accept that whatever philosophical journey they are on, and destination they work towards, is entirely their choice. They are making those choices because the believe they are the right choices to make so, if they're wrong, they don't know it.
Surely, we need to consider and concern ourselves with it. We may not see the indulgence in negative emotions useful, we may, and indeed we do, believe that they are incredibly dangerous to safe, rational decision making, but our partners DO NOT.
January 9, 2026 at 9:27 AM
Surely, we need to consider and concern ourselves with it. We may not see the indulgence in negative emotions useful, we may, and indeed we do, believe that they are incredibly dangerous to safe, rational decision making, but our partners DO NOT.
However, Stoicism doesn't instruct us to manage the emotions or personal beliefs of other people. So your partner, and mine, are not an influence on our own practice HOWEVER, at the same time, we need to ask, "What is a Just way to manage this major difference between us?"
January 9, 2026 at 9:27 AM
However, Stoicism doesn't instruct us to manage the emotions or personal beliefs of other people. So your partner, and mine, are not an influence on our own practice HOWEVER, at the same time, we need to ask, "What is a Just way to manage this major difference between us?"
Second, I know, form first-hand experience, that it can be extremely frustrating at times. Some people are deeply rooted in the feeling part of experiencing life. I'm married to a Filipina, so I can tell you that I know all about this. My wife regularly tells me not to be logical about emotions.
January 9, 2026 at 9:27 AM
Second, I know, form first-hand experience, that it can be extremely frustrating at times. Some people are deeply rooted in the feeling part of experiencing life. I'm married to a Filipina, so I can tell you that I know all about this. My wife regularly tells me not to be logical about emotions.
First, much of the world isn't Stoic, and we get along with most of it just fine. So your partner not being a Stoic doesn't mean your partner needs to go. Or, for that matter, convert.
January 9, 2026 at 9:27 AM
First, much of the world isn't Stoic, and we get along with most of it just fine. So your partner not being a Stoic doesn't mean your partner needs to go. Or, for that matter, convert.
I've received many questions about what to do when our spouse isn't #Stoic -- and by that, I hope what everyone means is that their spouse doesn't subscribe to Stoic ethical theory (or theory in general). I have thoughts, I'll share a few now.
January 9, 2026 at 9:27 AM
I've received many questions about what to do when our spouse isn't #Stoic -- and by that, I hope what everyone means is that their spouse doesn't subscribe to Stoic ethical theory (or theory in general). I have thoughts, I'll share a few now.
“O shit, Stoicism”
Owens.
Owens.
January 9, 2026 at 8:47 AM
“O shit, Stoicism”
Owens.
Owens.
It reminds me of how I felt the day I realised the bus driver from Mrs. Doubtfire was also the narrating voice of Grampa Time the 1980s children’s bedtime clock. Sydney Walker.
January 9, 2026 at 7:07 AM
It reminds me of how I felt the day I realised the bus driver from Mrs. Doubtfire was also the narrating voice of Grampa Time the 1980s children’s bedtime clock. Sydney Walker.
I was today years old when I found out that George Carlin narrated Thomas the Tank Engine. I’m sitting here, getting my son ready for nursery as he watches the show, and I recognised the voice immediately. I cannot comprehend how I didn’t catch it before. m.imdb.com/news/ni64448...
Why George Carlin Narrated Thomas the Tank Engine in the '90s - IMDb
IMDb, the world's most popular and authoritative source for movie, TV and celebrity content.
m.imdb.com
January 9, 2026 at 7:04 AM
I was today years old when I found out that George Carlin narrated Thomas the Tank Engine. I’m sitting here, getting my son ready for nursery as he watches the show, and I recognised the voice immediately. I cannot comprehend how I didn’t catch it before. m.imdb.com/news/ni64448...
This MN shooting thing with ICE - it's unreal. The defence of it is unreal. The woman was trying to flee, not run the guy over. You don't KILL PEOPLE for fleeing unless they are fleeing a fucking homicide. Killing a non-violent suspect at a traffic stop shouldn't even be on the table.
January 8, 2026 at 3:04 PM
This MN shooting thing with ICE - it's unreal. The defence of it is unreal. The woman was trying to flee, not run the guy over. You don't KILL PEOPLE for fleeing unless they are fleeing a fucking homicide. Killing a non-violent suspect at a traffic stop shouldn't even be on the table.
Not everyone appreciates their Stoicism study mixed up in Politics or current events, so last week I created a spin-off podcast specifically for these sorts of discussions. practicingstoicism.com
January 8, 2026 at 6:25 AM
Not everyone appreciates their Stoicism study mixed up in Politics or current events, so last week I created a spin-off podcast specifically for these sorts of discussions. practicingstoicism.com