Tanguy Le Fur
tanguylefur.bsky.social
Tanguy Le Fur
@tanguylefur.bsky.social
associate prof. (mcf) at Université de Lille | growth theory, economic history & history of economic thought | pétanque, craft beer & jazz guitar

https://sites.google.com/view/tanguylefur
l'équipe de Dialogues Economiques (@amse-aixmarseille.fr) a écrit un super résumé de notre article sur les implications macroéconomiques du potentiel effet négatif du temps de travail sur la santé, pour celles et ceux qui voudraient s'épargner tout un tas de jolies équations!
Pourquoi les Américains vivent-ils moins longtemps que les Européens alors qu’ils dépensent bien plus d’argent pour leur #santé ?

Et si le temps de #travail jouait un rôle ?

👉 lejournal.cnrs.fr/nos-blogs/di...
Travailler trop nuit gravement à la santé, l’exemple américain
lejournal.cnrs.fr
November 9, 2025 at 1:06 PM
as someone who engages in both growth theory and economic history i'm happy to see both fields celebrated by this year's Nobel, but because i also dabble in history of economic thought i think it should be noted that the decision to pool them together may not be as natural as it seems.
October 14, 2025 at 2:00 PM
Reposted by Tanguy Le Fur
What does a Nobel Prize on ‘innovation-driven economic growth’ actually reward?

A historian’s perspective on how to deal with the Nobel frenzy

beatricecherrier.wordpress.com/2025/10/13/w...
October 14, 2025 at 12:00 AM
our paper with @etiennewas.bsky.social is out in the Journal of Economic Growth, here's our modest contribution to the long-standing debate on the role of the appropriation of resources—and conflict more generally—in global economic history.

link.springer.com/article/10.1...
Fighting for resources: a unified growth model of the Great Divergence - Journal of Economic Growth
This paper interprets the Great Divergence as the cumulative influence of small asymmetries in technology or various initial conditions, amplified through conflict over resources. It introduces a trac...
link.springer.com
August 16, 2025 at 2:06 PM
new paper in which Etienne and I show that introducing conflict in a unified growth model can generate a Great Divergence without substantial differences in initial conditions, as the appropriation of resources amplifies even the slightest asymmetry between countries.

cepr.org/publications...
DP19955 Fighting for Resources: A Unified Growth Model of the Great Divergence
This paper interprets the Great Divergence as the cumulative influence of small asymmetries in technology or various initial conditions, amplified through conflict over resources. It introduces a tractable framework that integrates demography, technological progress, and conflict into a unified growth model. The amplification effect of resource appropriation is characterized by conflict multipliers in both the short- and long-run. Conflict is a source of substantial divergence, as appropriation of resources allows some polities (cities, countries) to develop faster at the expense of others. Reconvergence is, however, possible through population growth, due to strategic com- plementarities in fertility decisions and staggered demographic transitions. Rich and non-linear dynamics display key features of comparative economic development between the West and the Global South, but also shed light on a variety of historical case studies that share such dynamics of divergence and reconvergence as well as more dramatic episodes of population extinction in a dominated country. Our framework can easily be extended to study the role of resource exhaustion or the fundamental trade-off between trade and conflict.
cepr.org
February 23, 2025 at 5:51 PM