One Domino Away
@onedominoaway.bsky.social
A 700 page - 10 book saga published on July 4, 2025 by Jonathan Szany as a solution to what's wrong with American Representation in Government.
Pinned
@heritagefdn.bsky.social
I offer my answer to your Imperial Presidency under Project 2025. The Carbon Lattice Republic. A Decentralized House under a proper A1S2C3 Enumeration Ratio.
I offer my answer to your Imperial Presidency under Project 2025. The Carbon Lattice Republic. A Decentralized House under a proper A1S2C3 Enumeration Ratio.
Dear America,
Does the Constitution hold a different government within its text?
Something entirely different
yet doesnt alter a single word
Where
Representatives are capped at 30k people
No DC Bubble
Gerrymandering dies
States regain usefulness
And Your Voice returns
www.OneDominoAway.com
Does the Constitution hold a different government within its text?
Something entirely different
yet doesnt alter a single word
Where
Representatives are capped at 30k people
No DC Bubble
Gerrymandering dies
States regain usefulness
And Your Voice returns
www.OneDominoAway.com
The Carbon Lattice Republic » One Domino Away
A House of Representatives built on Legitimate Constitutional Enumeration. After each census, the Constitution requires 1 Representative Shall Not Exceed 30,000 people. That’s not a suggestion. The Ca...
www.OneDominoAway.com
November 20, 2025 at 2:08 AM
Dear America,
Does the Constitution hold a different government within its text?
Something entirely different
yet doesnt alter a single word
Where
Representatives are capped at 30k people
No DC Bubble
Gerrymandering dies
States regain usefulness
And Your Voice returns
www.OneDominoAway.com
Does the Constitution hold a different government within its text?
Something entirely different
yet doesnt alter a single word
Where
Representatives are capped at 30k people
No DC Bubble
Gerrymandering dies
States regain usefulness
And Your Voice returns
www.OneDominoAway.com
If anyone is hoping for Impeachment
Here is the 2026 Election Math
Democrats need a near flawless 2026 sweep
There are 33 Seats up for election
20 Republican Seats
13 Democrat Seats
Democrats currently have 45 Seats
To hit the 67 Vote Requirement for conviction and removal
32 wins are needed
Here is the 2026 Election Math
Democrats need a near flawless 2026 sweep
There are 33 Seats up for election
20 Republican Seats
13 Democrat Seats
Democrats currently have 45 Seats
To hit the 67 Vote Requirement for conviction and removal
32 wins are needed
November 19, 2025 at 3:51 AM
If anyone is hoping for Impeachment
Here is the 2026 Election Math
Democrats need a near flawless 2026 sweep
There are 33 Seats up for election
20 Republican Seats
13 Democrat Seats
Democrats currently have 45 Seats
To hit the 67 Vote Requirement for conviction and removal
32 wins are needed
Here is the 2026 Election Math
Democrats need a near flawless 2026 sweep
There are 33 Seats up for election
20 Republican Seats
13 Democrat Seats
Democrats currently have 45 Seats
To hit the 67 Vote Requirement for conviction and removal
32 wins are needed
An Old Whig, October 12, 1787
“On extraordinary occasions he may convene both houses… and if they cannot agree, he may adjourn them… He may, under colour of some emergency, do what he pleases.”
“On extraordinary occasions he may convene both houses… and if they cannot agree, he may adjourn them… He may, under colour of some emergency, do what he pleases.”
November 18, 2025 at 5:10 PM
An Old Whig, October 12, 1787
“On extraordinary occasions he may convene both houses… and if they cannot agree, he may adjourn them… He may, under colour of some emergency, do what he pleases.”
“On extraordinary occasions he may convene both houses… and if they cannot agree, he may adjourn them… He may, under colour of some emergency, do what he pleases.”
Federal Farmer Letter No. 3, October 10, 1787
“The executive and legislative are too intimately connected in this plan…The president has the power of making treaties with the advice of two-thirds of the senators present-he has the power of nominating all officers-he is to command the army and navy.”
“The executive and legislative are too intimately connected in this plan…The president has the power of making treaties with the advice of two-thirds of the senators present-he has the power of nominating all officers-he is to command the army and navy.”
November 18, 2025 at 5:09 PM
Federal Farmer Letter No. 3, October 10, 1787
“The executive and legislative are too intimately connected in this plan…The president has the power of making treaties with the advice of two-thirds of the senators present-he has the power of nominating all officers-he is to command the army and navy.”
“The executive and legislative are too intimately connected in this plan…The president has the power of making treaties with the advice of two-thirds of the senators present-he has the power of nominating all officers-he is to command the army and navy.”
Brutus Essay No. 1, October 18, 1787
“The president is invested with powers which, in a single person, are dangerous to the liberties of the people… He is commander-in-chief of the army, navy, and militia—he can make treaties—he can appoint all officers—he can pardon all offences.”
“The president is invested with powers which, in a single person, are dangerous to the liberties of the people… He is commander-in-chief of the army, navy, and militia—he can make treaties—he can appoint all officers—he can pardon all offences.”
November 18, 2025 at 5:07 PM
Brutus Essay No. 1, October 18, 1787
“The president is invested with powers which, in a single person, are dangerous to the liberties of the people… He is commander-in-chief of the army, navy, and militia—he can make treaties—he can appoint all officers—he can pardon all offences.”
“The president is invested with powers which, in a single person, are dangerous to the liberties of the people… He is commander-in-chief of the army, navy, and militia—he can make treaties—he can appoint all officers—he can pardon all offences.”
Cato Letter No. 4 (George Clinton), November 8, 1787
“This American president is in every particular a king… He is, for four years at a time, a king as much a king as the King of Great Britain, and almost as absolute as the Emperor of Russia.”
“This American president is in every particular a king… He is, for four years at a time, a king as much a king as the King of Great Britain, and almost as absolute as the Emperor of Russia.”
November 18, 2025 at 5:06 PM
Cato Letter No. 4 (George Clinton), November 8, 1787
“This American president is in every particular a king… He is, for four years at a time, a king as much a king as the King of Great Britain, and almost as absolute as the Emperor of Russia.”
“This American president is in every particular a king… He is, for four years at a time, a king as much a king as the King of Great Britain, and almost as absolute as the Emperor of Russia.”
Congressional Abdication of Tariffs
Reciprocal Trade Agreements Act of 1934
Trade Expansion Act of 1962
Trade Act of 1974
Trade Agreements Act of 1979
Trade and Tariff Act of 1984
Omnibus Foreign Trade and Competitiveness Act of 1988
Trade Act of 2002
Reciprocal Trade Agreements Act of 1934
Trade Expansion Act of 1962
Trade Act of 1974
Trade Agreements Act of 1979
Trade and Tariff Act of 1984
Omnibus Foreign Trade and Competitiveness Act of 1988
Trade Act of 2002
November 11, 2025 at 10:05 PM
Congressional Abdication of Tariffs
Reciprocal Trade Agreements Act of 1934
Trade Expansion Act of 1962
Trade Act of 1974
Trade Agreements Act of 1979
Trade and Tariff Act of 1984
Omnibus Foreign Trade and Competitiveness Act of 1988
Trade Act of 2002
Reciprocal Trade Agreements Act of 1934
Trade Expansion Act of 1962
Trade Act of 1974
Trade Agreements Act of 1979
Trade and Tariff Act of 1984
Omnibus Foreign Trade and Competitiveness Act of 1988
Trade Act of 2002
States VS The Federal Government.
The 13th-14th-15th Amendments in conjunction with Mississippi v Johnson essentially nullified the 9th and 10th Amendments
States were self reliant, Federal Assistance was sparse
Now, States rely on the Federal Government for everything
Can't even feed themselves
The 13th-14th-15th Amendments in conjunction with Mississippi v Johnson essentially nullified the 9th and 10th Amendments
States were self reliant, Federal Assistance was sparse
Now, States rely on the Federal Government for everything
Can't even feed themselves
November 10, 2025 at 2:13 AM
States VS The Federal Government.
The 13th-14th-15th Amendments in conjunction with Mississippi v Johnson essentially nullified the 9th and 10th Amendments
States were self reliant, Federal Assistance was sparse
Now, States rely on the Federal Government for everything
Can't even feed themselves
The 13th-14th-15th Amendments in conjunction with Mississippi v Johnson essentially nullified the 9th and 10th Amendments
States were self reliant, Federal Assistance was sparse
Now, States rely on the Federal Government for everything
Can't even feed themselves
Taxation under Closure
Should Americans be paying Taxes to a Closed Government?
We may have Representation in name... but not function.
So ingrained into the system, taxes come right out of each check, before you even get it
You have no ability to withhold, without altering a W2
IRS always paid
Should Americans be paying Taxes to a Closed Government?
We may have Representation in name... but not function.
So ingrained into the system, taxes come right out of each check, before you even get it
You have no ability to withhold, without altering a W2
IRS always paid
November 9, 2025 at 1:19 AM
Taxation under Closure
Should Americans be paying Taxes to a Closed Government?
We may have Representation in name... but not function.
So ingrained into the system, taxes come right out of each check, before you even get it
You have no ability to withhold, without altering a W2
IRS always paid
Should Americans be paying Taxes to a Closed Government?
We may have Representation in name... but not function.
So ingrained into the system, taxes come right out of each check, before you even get it
You have no ability to withhold, without altering a W2
IRS always paid
The Government Shut Down
How long does the shutdown need to last, before Federal Taxes stop being taken out of my paycheck?
Or are Taxes just some permanent thing that exist, regardless if Government is running or not?
If the Government stays closed for a year...
What am I paying for?
How long does the shutdown need to last, before Federal Taxes stop being taken out of my paycheck?
Or are Taxes just some permanent thing that exist, regardless if Government is running or not?
If the Government stays closed for a year...
What am I paying for?
November 9, 2025 at 1:11 AM
The Government Shut Down
How long does the shutdown need to last, before Federal Taxes stop being taken out of my paycheck?
Or are Taxes just some permanent thing that exist, regardless if Government is running or not?
If the Government stays closed for a year...
What am I paying for?
How long does the shutdown need to last, before Federal Taxes stop being taken out of my paycheck?
Or are Taxes just some permanent thing that exist, regardless if Government is running or not?
If the Government stays closed for a year...
What am I paying for?
23 years after NAFTA'S implementation
Ross Perot's prediction comes true
Import Tariffs are Executed
The piper plays now, payment will be due
SCOTUS is useless
The Legislature Abdicates
Even if they alter it, the pin has been pulled.
The hurt of 50+ years of loss of manufacturing will be felt
Ross Perot's prediction comes true
Import Tariffs are Executed
The piper plays now, payment will be due
SCOTUS is useless
The Legislature Abdicates
Even if they alter it, the pin has been pulled.
The hurt of 50+ years of loss of manufacturing will be felt
November 7, 2025 at 3:37 AM
23 years after NAFTA'S implementation
Ross Perot's prediction comes true
Import Tariffs are Executed
The piper plays now, payment will be due
SCOTUS is useless
The Legislature Abdicates
Even if they alter it, the pin has been pulled.
The hurt of 50+ years of loss of manufacturing will be felt
Ross Perot's prediction comes true
Import Tariffs are Executed
The piper plays now, payment will be due
SCOTUS is useless
The Legislature Abdicates
Even if they alter it, the pin has been pulled.
The hurt of 50+ years of loss of manufacturing will be felt
onedominoaway.com/wp-content/u...
A free copy to anyone willing to read.
How do we fix the House of Representatives?
Article 1 Section 2 Clause 3
1 Representative shall not exceed 30,000 people
331,449,281 Americans ÷ 30,000 People = 11,048 Representatives
Why are We locked out?
Stuck at 435
A free copy to anyone willing to read.
How do we fix the House of Representatives?
Article 1 Section 2 Clause 3
1 Representative shall not exceed 30,000 people
331,449,281 Americans ÷ 30,000 People = 11,048 Representatives
Why are We locked out?
Stuck at 435
November 5, 2025 at 10:12 PM
onedominoaway.com/wp-content/u...
A free copy to anyone willing to read.
How do we fix the House of Representatives?
Article 1 Section 2 Clause 3
1 Representative shall not exceed 30,000 people
331,449,281 Americans ÷ 30,000 People = 11,048 Representatives
Why are We locked out?
Stuck at 435
A free copy to anyone willing to read.
How do we fix the House of Representatives?
Article 1 Section 2 Clause 3
1 Representative shall not exceed 30,000 people
331,449,281 Americans ÷ 30,000 People = 11,048 Representatives
Why are We locked out?
Stuck at 435
The Judiciary vs The Executive
The Judiciary's rulings matter not to the Executive.
SCOTUS Unanimously Admits this, in Mississippi Vs Johnson.
Jackson and Lincoln
Ignored SCOTUS without Reprimand
Lincoln even got Legislative Approval after a year and a half.
When he suspended habeas corpus
The Judiciary's rulings matter not to the Executive.
SCOTUS Unanimously Admits this, in Mississippi Vs Johnson.
Jackson and Lincoln
Ignored SCOTUS without Reprimand
Lincoln even got Legislative Approval after a year and a half.
When he suspended habeas corpus
November 5, 2025 at 3:18 AM
The Judiciary vs The Executive
The Judiciary's rulings matter not to the Executive.
SCOTUS Unanimously Admits this, in Mississippi Vs Johnson.
Jackson and Lincoln
Ignored SCOTUS without Reprimand
Lincoln even got Legislative Approval after a year and a half.
When he suspended habeas corpus
The Judiciary's rulings matter not to the Executive.
SCOTUS Unanimously Admits this, in Mississippi Vs Johnson.
Jackson and Lincoln
Ignored SCOTUS without Reprimand
Lincoln even got Legislative Approval after a year and a half.
When he suspended habeas corpus
The Constitution's Roadmap for fixing a broken Government.
Article 5
Convention of the States
Bypasses the Federal Government
However those are messy, unless theres a singular goal
Article 1 Section 2 Clause 3
1 Representative shall not exceed 30,000 people
Fix the House, everything else follows
Article 5
Convention of the States
Bypasses the Federal Government
However those are messy, unless theres a singular goal
Article 1 Section 2 Clause 3
1 Representative shall not exceed 30,000 people
Fix the House, everything else follows
November 2, 2025 at 1:31 PM
The Constitution's Roadmap for fixing a broken Government.
Article 5
Convention of the States
Bypasses the Federal Government
However those are messy, unless theres a singular goal
Article 1 Section 2 Clause 3
1 Representative shall not exceed 30,000 people
Fix the House, everything else follows
Article 5
Convention of the States
Bypasses the Federal Government
However those are messy, unless theres a singular goal
Article 1 Section 2 Clause 3
1 Representative shall not exceed 30,000 people
Fix the House, everything else follows
Give me your tired and poor
I will Take them
The downtrodden and the hungry
I will help them
You break the laws
Go back home.
You came here for a better life
Yet try to turn here into there
Why leave there to begin with?
The concept of the melting pot
You melt...
You dont melt, you dont fit.
I will Take them
The downtrodden and the hungry
I will help them
You break the laws
Go back home.
You came here for a better life
Yet try to turn here into there
Why leave there to begin with?
The concept of the melting pot
You melt...
You dont melt, you dont fit.
November 2, 2025 at 12:30 PM
Give me your tired and poor
I will Take them
The downtrodden and the hungry
I will help them
You break the laws
Go back home.
You came here for a better life
Yet try to turn here into there
Why leave there to begin with?
The concept of the melting pot
You melt...
You dont melt, you dont fit.
I will Take them
The downtrodden and the hungry
I will help them
You break the laws
Go back home.
You came here for a better life
Yet try to turn here into there
Why leave there to begin with?
The concept of the melting pot
You melt...
You dont melt, you dont fit.
SNAP seems like a 10th Amendment issue to me... why is the Federal Government even involved?
Now the fact that 40+million Americans are on SNAP is a more concerning issue to me...
How do we make 40+m Americans no longer need SNAP??
Shouldn't THAT be the role of the Federal Government, instead?
Now the fact that 40+million Americans are on SNAP is a more concerning issue to me...
How do we make 40+m Americans no longer need SNAP??
Shouldn't THAT be the role of the Federal Government, instead?
November 1, 2025 at 11:39 AM
SNAP seems like a 10th Amendment issue to me... why is the Federal Government even involved?
Now the fact that 40+million Americans are on SNAP is a more concerning issue to me...
How do we make 40+m Americans no longer need SNAP??
Shouldn't THAT be the role of the Federal Government, instead?
Now the fact that 40+million Americans are on SNAP is a more concerning issue to me...
How do we make 40+m Americans no longer need SNAP??
Shouldn't THAT be the role of the Federal Government, instead?
Federal Programs Vs State Programs
Should SNAP be a Federal Program or a State one?
Should Unemployment?
Should Welfare?
Should Education?
Should Healthcare?
Should the Federal Government only facilitate state programs across state lines?
Should we have 50 experiments?
Or 1 program federally?
Should SNAP be a Federal Program or a State one?
Should Unemployment?
Should Welfare?
Should Education?
Should Healthcare?
Should the Federal Government only facilitate state programs across state lines?
Should we have 50 experiments?
Or 1 program federally?
October 29, 2025 at 4:03 PM
Federal Programs Vs State Programs
Should SNAP be a Federal Program or a State one?
Should Unemployment?
Should Welfare?
Should Education?
Should Healthcare?
Should the Federal Government only facilitate state programs across state lines?
Should we have 50 experiments?
Or 1 program federally?
Should SNAP be a Federal Program or a State one?
Should Unemployment?
Should Welfare?
Should Education?
Should Healthcare?
Should the Federal Government only facilitate state programs across state lines?
Should we have 50 experiments?
Or 1 program federally?
Cato V
Nov 22, 1787
you will incline to an arbitrary and odious aristocracy or monarchy the that the president possessed of the power, given him by this frame of government differs but very immaterially from the establishment of monarchy in Great Britain
#NoKings
onedominoaway.com/Forums/topic...
Nov 22, 1787
you will incline to an arbitrary and odious aristocracy or monarchy the that the president possessed of the power, given him by this frame of government differs but very immaterially from the establishment of monarchy in Great Britain
#NoKings
onedominoaway.com/Forums/topic...
Cato V » One Domino Away
Cato V November 22, 1787 by Cato To the Citizens of the State of New York. In my last number I endeavored to prove that the language of the article relative to the establishment of the executive of th...
onedominoaway.com
October 29, 2025 at 3:45 PM
Cato V
Nov 22, 1787
you will incline to an arbitrary and odious aristocracy or monarchy the that the president possessed of the power, given him by this frame of government differs but very immaterially from the establishment of monarchy in Great Britain
#NoKings
onedominoaway.com/Forums/topic...
Nov 22, 1787
you will incline to an arbitrary and odious aristocracy or monarchy the that the president possessed of the power, given him by this frame of government differs but very immaterially from the establishment of monarchy in Great Britain
#NoKings
onedominoaway.com/Forums/topic...
A Consolidated Government is a Tyranny
17 October 1787
by Montezuma
(Anti-Federalist Papers)
#NoKings
Try Designed that way
onedominoaway.com/Forums/topic...
17 October 1787
by Montezuma
(Anti-Federalist Papers)
#NoKings
Try Designed that way
onedominoaway.com/Forums/topic...
Montezuma - A Consolidated Government is a Tyranny » One Domino Away
A Consolidated Government is a Tyranny Montezuma 17 October 1787 by Montezuma, Montezuma See also Federalist No. 9 We the Aristocratic party of the United States, lamenting the many inconveniences to ...
onedominoaway.com
October 29, 2025 at 3:39 PM
A Consolidated Government is a Tyranny
17 October 1787
by Montezuma
(Anti-Federalist Papers)
#NoKings
Try Designed that way
onedominoaway.com/Forums/topic...
17 October 1787
by Montezuma
(Anti-Federalist Papers)
#NoKings
Try Designed that way
onedominoaway.com/Forums/topic...
An Old Whig
Anti‑Federalist “No. 70” (titled The Powers and Dangerous Potentials of His Elected Majesty)
#NoKings
Try Designed that way
onedominoaway.com/Forums/topic...
Anti‑Federalist “No. 70” (titled The Powers and Dangerous Potentials of His Elected Majesty)
#NoKings
Try Designed that way
onedominoaway.com/Forums/topic...
Old Whig - The Powers and Dangerous Potentials of His Elected Majesty » One Domino Away
The Powers and Dangerous Potentials of His Elected Majesty by AN OLD WHIG's" essay from The New-York Journal of December 11, 1787. See also Federalist No. 70 .… In the first place the office of presid...
onedominoaway.com
October 29, 2025 at 3:31 AM
An Old Whig
Anti‑Federalist “No. 70” (titled The Powers and Dangerous Potentials of His Elected Majesty)
#NoKings
Try Designed that way
onedominoaway.com/Forums/topic...
Anti‑Federalist “No. 70” (titled The Powers and Dangerous Potentials of His Elected Majesty)
#NoKings
Try Designed that way
onedominoaway.com/Forums/topic...
Cato's Warning
The Imperial Presidency by Design
Anti-Federalist No. 67:
"The President... with the power of war and treaties... will become a monarch in all but name..."
The Imperial Presidency by Design
Anti-Federalist No. 67:
"The President... with the power of war and treaties... will become a monarch in all but name..."
October 28, 2025 at 3:28 AM
Cato's Warning
The Imperial Presidency by Design
Anti-Federalist No. 67:
"The President... with the power of war and treaties... will become a monarch in all but name..."
The Imperial Presidency by Design
Anti-Federalist No. 67:
"The President... with the power of war and treaties... will become a monarch in all but name..."
Nearly $40 Trillion in debt?
Interest alone, is now $1 Trillion a year
This is unsustainable, under any metrics
What programs do you cut?
What taxes do you raise?
What do you enact, to change course?
Interest alone, is now $1 Trillion a year
This is unsustainable, under any metrics
What programs do you cut?
What taxes do you raise?
What do you enact, to change course?
October 27, 2025 at 9:30 PM
Nearly $40 Trillion in debt?
Interest alone, is now $1 Trillion a year
This is unsustainable, under any metrics
What programs do you cut?
What taxes do you raise?
What do you enact, to change course?
Interest alone, is now $1 Trillion a year
This is unsustainable, under any metrics
What programs do you cut?
What taxes do you raise?
What do you enact, to change course?
Fuck Democracy
The bane of the Republic.
Democracy —
the worst word spoken in America.
To proclaim what we are not.
To believe what we never were.
To cherish a lie over the written clause.
To demand action in its name — is seditious.
To declare results under its banner — is mutiny.
The bane of the Republic.
Democracy —
the worst word spoken in America.
To proclaim what we are not.
To believe what we never were.
To cherish a lie over the written clause.
To demand action in its name — is seditious.
To declare results under its banner — is mutiny.
October 26, 2025 at 2:42 PM
Fuck Democracy
The bane of the Republic.
Democracy —
the worst word spoken in America.
To proclaim what we are not.
To believe what we never were.
To cherish a lie over the written clause.
To demand action in its name — is seditious.
To declare results under its banner — is mutiny.
The bane of the Republic.
Democracy —
the worst word spoken in America.
To proclaim what we are not.
To believe what we never were.
To cherish a lie over the written clause.
To demand action in its name — is seditious.
To declare results under its banner — is mutiny.
Laws Vs Rights
Can you tell them apart?
Welfare... a right, or a law?
Social Security... a right, or a law?
SNAP... a right, or a law?
Medicare... a right, or a law?
Education... a right, or a law?
Abortion... a right, or a law?
Does Law create Rights?
Or does it create Law?
...Mistaken as Rights?
Can you tell them apart?
Welfare... a right, or a law?
Social Security... a right, or a law?
SNAP... a right, or a law?
Medicare... a right, or a law?
Education... a right, or a law?
Abortion... a right, or a law?
Does Law create Rights?
Or does it create Law?
...Mistaken as Rights?
October 25, 2025 at 3:18 PM
Laws Vs Rights
Can you tell them apart?
Welfare... a right, or a law?
Social Security... a right, or a law?
SNAP... a right, or a law?
Medicare... a right, or a law?
Education... a right, or a law?
Abortion... a right, or a law?
Does Law create Rights?
Or does it create Law?
...Mistaken as Rights?
Can you tell them apart?
Welfare... a right, or a law?
Social Security... a right, or a law?
SNAP... a right, or a law?
Medicare... a right, or a law?
Education... a right, or a law?
Abortion... a right, or a law?
Does Law create Rights?
Or does it create Law?
...Mistaken as Rights?
Dear #NoKings
Your protests are fruitless
Consider a change in tactics
You offer no solution.
Organize the one thing that the Constitution cant ignore
Article V
A Convention of the States
Solution = Repeal the Reapportionment Act of 1929
It Unlocks the House of the People from the 435 cap
Your protests are fruitless
Consider a change in tactics
You offer no solution.
Organize the one thing that the Constitution cant ignore
Article V
A Convention of the States
Solution = Repeal the Reapportionment Act of 1929
It Unlocks the House of the People from the 435 cap
October 25, 2025 at 2:36 AM
Dear #NoKings
Your protests are fruitless
Consider a change in tactics
You offer no solution.
Organize the one thing that the Constitution cant ignore
Article V
A Convention of the States
Solution = Repeal the Reapportionment Act of 1929
It Unlocks the House of the People from the 435 cap
Your protests are fruitless
Consider a change in tactics
You offer no solution.
Organize the one thing that the Constitution cant ignore
Article V
A Convention of the States
Solution = Repeal the Reapportionment Act of 1929
It Unlocks the House of the People from the 435 cap