With or without the home made ice tea.
With or without the home made ice tea.
Vegan Macaroni hawaian chilli.
Hot chilipepers.
Pineapple and pineapple juice from a can.
Tomato sauce.
Dried basilicum.
Italian herbs.
It's the kind of food that's delicious when you're broke and under siege for days.
Vegan Macaroni hawaian chilli.
Hot chilipepers.
Pineapple and pineapple juice from a can.
Tomato sauce.
Dried basilicum.
Italian herbs.
It's the kind of food that's delicious when you're broke and under siege for days.
Or someone better at inconvenional tactics, but those are some pretty niche skills, you know...
Or someone better at inconvenional tactics, but those are some pretty niche skills, you know...
I can stay off the drugs for a bit.
I concede that point.
I can stay off the drugs for a bit.
I concede that point.
And that's all I have.
And that's all I have.
She could choose any entrepreneur and he'd probably be a lot richer than me.
That's what everyone around me keeps telling me.
She could choose any entrepreneur and he'd probably be a lot richer than me.
That's what everyone around me keeps telling me.
She could choose someone from the special forces and he'd probably be a lot tougher than me.
She could choose any athlete and he'd probably have a much better physical condition than me.
She could choose someone from the special forces and he'd probably be a lot tougher than me.
She could choose any athlete and he'd probably have a much better physical condition than me.
Clear rules of engagement and a clear and targeted assassination doctrine.
That shouldn't be that hard, no?
Clear rules of engagement and a clear and targeted assassination doctrine.
That shouldn't be that hard, no?
I think NATO would benefit from clear rules engagement for assassinations.
The weakness of the Niko-doctrine would be in blurring the line between war, hybrid war, and merely diplomatic tensions.
The rational being, if there's no clear starting point the doctrine fails.
I think NATO would benefit from clear rules engagement for assassinations.
The weakness of the Niko-doctrine would be in blurring the line between war, hybrid war, and merely diplomatic tensions.
The rational being, if there's no clear starting point the doctrine fails.
"The first person you target in any war, should the person responsible for starting said war."
I believe that to be self-evident.
"The first person you target in any war, should the person responsible for starting said war."
I believe that to be self-evident.
"War shouldn't exist, so we should invest in the capacity to most efficiently destroy anyone who would curse us with it."
"War shouldn't exist, so we should invest in the capacity to most efficiently destroy anyone who would curse us with it."
Can you imagine how powerful and self destructive to one's capacity to defend themselves the following narrative is:
"War ought not to exist, so we shouldn't invest anything into the capacity to wage it."
Can you imagine how powerful and self destructive to one's capacity to defend themselves the following narrative is:
"War ought not to exist, so we shouldn't invest anything into the capacity to wage it."
Far away from any battlefield before they ever have the chance to launch a war, because I fucking hate sitting in the cold being a target.
Far away from any battlefield before they ever have the chance to launch a war, because I fucking hate sitting in the cold being a target.
Any man in his right mind would hate war.
Yet, still some people, with no intentions of doing the suffering keep pushing exactly that.
Any man in his right mind would hate war.
Yet, still some people, with no intentions of doing the suffering keep pushing exactly that.
Suffering through them serves no inherent purpose other than getting used to them.
It does not create, nor holds any value other than the capacity to weather them.
Suffering through them serves no inherent purpose other than getting used to them.
It does not create, nor holds any value other than the capacity to weather them.
Sadly it does.
Soldiers ought not to be necessary.
Sadly, they are.
Sadly it does.
Soldiers ought not to be necessary.
Sadly, they are.