Mosquito Papers
mosquitopapers.bsky.social
Mosquito Papers
@mosquitopapers.bsky.social
Papers just released covering mosquitoes, with an emphasis on sensory biology.
Distinct prior expectations shape tactile and proprioceptive localization
When a mosquito lands on your finger, swatting it away requires your brain to calculate its location in the external space, which depends on the body's 3D posture. Two competing hypotheses explain how the brain solves this challenge: the integration hypothesis, where tactile signals are transformed into spatial coordinates by integrating touch and posture information; and the cueing hypothesis, where touch merely cues a location on the body whose position is specified via proprioception. Adjudicating between these hypotheses is nearly impossible without modeling the latent factors underlying somatosensory spatial perception. We fill this gap in the present study. We first formalized each hypothesis from a Bayesian perspective: If touch merely triggers proprioceptive localization (cueing hypothesis), tactile and proprioceptive localization should rely on the same Bayesian computations, with identical prior expectations about the mosquito's spatial location; If they involve distinct Bayesian computational processes (integration hypothesis), distinct prior expectations may shape tactile and proprioceptive localization. To test these predictions, we had nineteen participants localize either proprioceptive or tactile targets on their fingertips. We then fit their data with several Bayesian models of each hypothesis. Models allowing different prior distributions between modalities provided the best fit for most participants, with 17 out of 19 participants showing significantly different prior distributions across modalities. These provide strong computational evidence that tactile and proprioceptive localization rely on distinct computational mechanisms, a conclusion that has important implications for how we understand these everyday behaviors and their neural mechanisms.
dlvr.it
November 17, 2025 at 11:25 PM
Distinct prior expectations shape tactile and proprioceptive localization
When a mosquito lands on your finger, swatting it away requires your brain to calculate its location in the external space, which depends on the body's 3D posture. Two competing hypotheses explain how the brain solves this challenge: the integration hypothesis, where tactile signals are transformed into spatial coordinates by integrating touch and posture information; and the cueing hypothesis, where touch merely cues a location on the body whose position is specified via proprioception. Adjudicating between these hypotheses is nearly impossible without modeling the latent factors underlying somatosensory spatial perception. We fill this gap in the present study. We first formalized each hypothesis from a Bayesian perspective: If touch merely triggers proprioceptive localization (cueing hypothesis), tactile and proprioceptive localization should rely on the same Bayesian computations, with identical prior expectations about the mosquito's spatial location; If they involve distinct Bayesian computational processes (integration hypothesis), distinct prior expectations may shape tactile and proprioceptive localization. To test these predictions, we had nineteen participants localize either proprioceptive or tactile targets on their fingertips. We then fit their data with several Bayesian models of each hypothesis. Models allowing different prior distributions between modalities provided the best fit for most participants, with 17 out of 19 participants showing significantly different prior distributions across modalities. These provide strong computational evidence that tactile and proprioceptive localization rely on distinct computational mechanisms, a conclusion that has important implications for how we understand these everyday behaviors and their neural mechanisms.
dlvr.it
November 17, 2025 at 11:19 PM
A cytochrome P450 G subfamily member, CYP4G35, is highly expressed in antennae and modulates olfactory response in Aedes aegypti mosquitoes.
The cytochrome P450 enzymes of the CYP4G subfamily are some of the most enigmatic insect P450s. The dipterans with sequenced genomes have two CYP4G paralogs. In Drosophila melanogaster, CYP4G1 is highly expressed in the oenocytes and catalyzes the last enzymatic step in the biosynthesis of cuticular hydrocarbons. In contrast, CYP4G15 is expressed in the brain glial cells, but its function is unknown. The Aedes aegypti genome encodes two CYP4Gs: CYP4G36 (ortholog of DmCYP4G1) and CYP4G35 (ortholog of DmCYP4G15). Here, we show that CYP4G35 is highly expressed in mosquito antennae, and the RNAi knockdown of CYP4G35 results in delayed host-seeking. Ae. aegypti CYP4G knockout lines confirmed delayed host-seeking behavior in CYP4G35 knockout females. Proteomics analysis of CYP4G35 knockout females also corroborates the physiological findings and reveals upregulation of proteins related to olfaction and other CYP4Gs, indicating a compensatory response to the absence of CYP4G35. Immunohistochemistry and in situ hybridization were used to localize CYP4G35, demonstrating its expression in the sensilla lymph of the antennae and the tip of the proboscis. CYP4G35 and CYP4G36 fusion proteins with cytochrome P450 reductase demonstrated that, unlike CYP4G36, CYP4G35 lacks an oxidative decarbonylase function. Together, our data support a novel function of CYP4G35 in modulating olfactory response.
dlvr.it
November 14, 2025 at 9:19 PM
Exploring the importance and preference of sugar feeding behaviour of malaria vectors in sugar plantations of southern Malawi
Background Reliable tools are needed to control opportunistic outdoor biting and resting malaria vectors that remain beyond the reach of indoor targeted interventions. The attractive targeted sugar baits (ATSBs) have demonstrated effectiveness in some settings but have shown limited impact in other areas, likely due to differences in mosquito species preferences and the presence of competing natural sugar sources. However, these factors remain poorly understood and understudied. We evaluated sugar-feeding behaviour of Anopheline mosquitoes in a sugarcane plantation area of Chikwawa, Malawi, to generate additional field data that could enhance the efficacy and design of sugar-based vector control tools tailored for malaria endemic regions such as Malawi. Methods Using three collection tools, CDC Light traps; Prokopack aspirator and the barrier screen, we collected 187 adult anophelines from the Illovo sugar plantations. Collected mosquitoes were subjected to cold anthrone tests in the laboratory to assess the presence of plant sugars in their gut. Additionally, 810 adult Anopheles gambiae s.l, reared in the insectary from wild caught larvae, were exposed in an olfactory-driven choice experiment to identify the most attractive available sugar source in the area. Sugar sources included guavas, melon, bananas, mango, marula and sugarcane. Results Over 40% (n=74) of the collected Anopheles mosquitoes- including An. gambiae s.l, An. funestus, An. coustani and An. tenebrous were found to have fed on natural sugar sources. For the sugar attractiveness tests for An. gambiae s.l, guava was found to be twice as attractive (IRR = 1.97, 95% CI: 1.49-2.62, p < 0.001) as sugarcane (our reference fruit), followed by banana (IRR= 1.68, 95% CI: 1.26-2.24, P < 0.001), then mango, and melon (IRR= 1.49, 95% CI: 1.11-2.01, P= 0.008) and (IRR=1.45, 95% CI: 1.08-1.96, P= 0.014) respectively. Conclusion Sugar feeding is a key activity for Anopheles mosquitoes and presents a potential target for control efforts. In this setting with abundant sugarcane, guava was identified as the most attractive sugar source for An. gambiae s.l, followed by banana, mango, and melon, with sugarcane being the least attractive. Understanding local sugar source preferences can help tailor novel intervention strategies to specific environmental contexts.
dlvr.it
November 8, 2025 at 5:43 AM