Paul’s Boutique
@modernhomesla.bsky.social
Reposted by Paul’s Boutique
Donald Trump’s chaotic tariff polices have created a one-stop-shop for corruption.
Perhaps that’s what Elon Musk means by efficiency.
Perhaps that’s what Elon Musk means by efficiency.
Donald Trump’s chaotic tariff polices have created a one-stop-shop for corruption.
YouTube video by Senator Elizabeth Warren
youtube.com
May 2, 2025 at 9:52 PM
Donald Trump’s chaotic tariff polices have created a one-stop-shop for corruption.
Perhaps that’s what Elon Musk means by efficiency.
Perhaps that’s what Elon Musk means by efficiency.
Reposted by Paul’s Boutique
JD Vance holds a JD from Yale Law (and so do I). Presumably, he knows that he is disregarding the law here, and being deceptive about the protections it affords. (1/6)
April 1, 2025 at 6:47 PM
JD Vance holds a JD from Yale Law (and so do I). Presumably, he knows that he is disregarding the law here, and being deceptive about the protections it affords. (1/6)
Reposted by Paul’s Boutique
At least one other judge is prepped to do what Howell does here--point out that the problem with Paul Weiss was not a NatSec issue. It was just that they hadn't bribed Trump yet.
![Second, and tellingly, the Paul, Weiss EO contained a virtually identical security clearance
review provision to the one at issue in this case. Compare EO 14230 § 2, 90 Fed. Reg. at 11781,
with Paul, Weiss EO § 2, 90 Fed. Reg. at 13039. As discussed, see supra Part III.B.1(b), the Paul,
Weiss EO was revoked only seven days after its issuance when President Trump reached a “deal”
with that firm. See generally Paul, Weiss Revocation Order, 90 Fed. Reg. 13685. While the Paul,
Weiss Revocation Order summarized that firm’s agreement to, inter alia, “adopt[] a policy of
political neutrality with respect to client selection and attorney hiring; tak[e] on a wide range of
pro bono matters representing the full political spectrum; commit[] to merit-based hiring,
promotion, and retention . . .; dedicat[e] the equivalent of $40 million in pro bono legal services
during [President Trump’s] term in office . . .; and other similar initiatives,” none of these agreedupon policy or practice changes appear to explain or address how any national security concerns
sufficient to warrant the Paul, Weiss EO could have changed so rapidly. Id. § 1, 90 Fed. Reg. at
13685. The speed of the reversal and the rationale provided in the Paul, Weiss Revocation Order, which focused only on agreements to advance policy initiatives of the Trump Administration, see
id., further support the conclusion that national security considerations are not a plausible
explanation for Section 2.](https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_thumbnail/plain/did:plc:bbp2b224lro3bfnzcqwwnkfo/bafkreibf4neutbr35rydx6sxznmmy6bkmbsajs4gs3khw57y6ilf6cbvt4@jpeg)
May 2, 2025 at 11:34 PM
At least one other judge is prepped to do what Howell does here--point out that the problem with Paul Weiss was not a NatSec issue. It was just that they hadn't bribed Trump yet.
Reposted by Paul’s Boutique
Kirsten, are the three investigations moving forward or were they shut down after the new administration entered the picture? Are the canned responses from USAF mean there won't be traction?
February 10, 2025 at 5:15 AM
Kirsten, are the three investigations moving forward or were they shut down after the new administration entered the picture? Are the canned responses from USAF mean there won't be traction?
Reposted by Paul’s Boutique
Thank you for stating the obvious: Sister-wife Compound. The pronatalist-futurist-Mormon-like fElon Musk hasn't figured out yet his "social" platform isolates people, preventing people to couple and mate. He's truly a dope. A whack-job billionaire with the Boys From Brazil. Ick.
May 3, 2025 at 3:29 AM
Thank you for stating the obvious: Sister-wife Compound. The pronatalist-futurist-Mormon-like fElon Musk hasn't figured out yet his "social" platform isolates people, preventing people to couple and mate. He's truly a dope. A whack-job billionaire with the Boys From Brazil. Ick.
Reposted by Paul’s Boutique
To understand Elon Musk’s unprecedented takeover of Washington, read this story 👇👇
Our deep dive into Musk's takeover: Even some officials who like what Musk is doing feel helpless to hold him accountable. His allies are diving in to agencies, gaining access to systems, planning layoffs, and proposing a sweeping AI initiative to review contracts. www.nytimes.com/2025/02/03/u...
Inside Musk’s Aggressive Incursion Into the Federal Government (Gift Article)
The billionaire is creating major upheaval as his team sweeps through agencies, in what has been an extraordinary flexing of power by a private individual.
www.nytimes.com
February 4, 2025 at 4:06 AM
To understand Elon Musk’s unprecedented takeover of Washington, read this story 👇👇
Reposted by Paul’s Boutique
!!! Musk, the world's richest man, heads to the Department of Ed, on his path to radically reshape the government. Here's our story! www.nytimes.com/2025/02/04/u...
Musk Team Scrutinizes Education Department Operations (Gift Article)
The engagement is the latest sign of the billionaire’s expanding influence across the government, which already stretches into more than half a dozen agencies.
www.nytimes.com
February 4, 2025 at 11:04 PM
!!! Musk, the world's richest man, heads to the Department of Ed, on his path to radically reshape the government. Here's our story! www.nytimes.com/2025/02/04/u...
Reposted by Paul’s Boutique
⚡️ Supreme Court dismisses oligarch Kolomoisky's appeal for restoring Privatbank ownership.
Ukraine's Supreme Court on Nov. 26 upheld earlier rulings on nationalizing Ukraine's largest bank and dismissed an appeal of its former owner Ihor Kolomoisky, ending a years-long case.
Ukraine's Supreme Court on Nov. 26 upheld earlier rulings on nationalizing Ukraine's largest bank and dismissed an appeal of its former owner Ihor Kolomoisky, ending a years-long case.
Supreme Court puts an end to oligarch Kolomoisky's appeal for restoring Privatbank ownership
Ukraine's Supreme Court on Nov. 26 upheld earlier rulings on nationalizing Ukraine's largest bank and dismissed an appeal of its former owner Ihor Kolomoisky, ending a years-long case.
kyivindependent.com
November 26, 2024 at 1:47 PM
⚡️ Supreme Court dismisses oligarch Kolomoisky's appeal for restoring Privatbank ownership.
Ukraine's Supreme Court on Nov. 26 upheld earlier rulings on nationalizing Ukraine's largest bank and dismissed an appeal of its former owner Ihor Kolomoisky, ending a years-long case.
Ukraine's Supreme Court on Nov. 26 upheld earlier rulings on nationalizing Ukraine's largest bank and dismissed an appeal of its former owner Ihor Kolomoisky, ending a years-long case.