Studying work involving intelligent machines, especially robots. @MITSloan PhD, @Ucsb Asst Prof, @Stanford and @MIT Digital Fellow, @Tedtalks @Thinkers50
Oregon State University; University of California, Santa Barbara; University of California System; Massachusetts Institute of Technology • Digital Economy and Work Transformation, Innovation and Knowledge Management, Surgical Simulation and Training
Reposted by Matt Beane
Reposted by Helen Margetts, Evan Selinger, Dan MacLean , and 1 more Helen Margetts, Evan Selinger, Dan MacLean, Matt Beane
Reposted by Matt Beane
We're hosting our Wharton AI and the Future of Work Conference on 5/21-22. Last year was a great event with some of the top papers on AI and work.
Paper submission deadline is 3/3. Come join us! Submit papers here: forms.gle/ozJ5xEaktXDE...
Reposted by Matt Beane
Reposted by Amy X. Zhang, Matt Beane
Reposted by Matt Beane
Table of contents:
Reposted by Matt Beane
Reposted by Matt Beane
Linke below to hear the full discussion on Friday, December 13 at 11 am EST!
linktr.ee/RitaMcGrath
@mattbeane.bsky.social
Most engineers/CS working on AI presume away well established, profound brakes on AI diffusion.
Most social scientists presume away how AI use could reshape those brakes.
Let's gather these groups, examine these brakes 1-by-1, make grounded predictions.
Reposted by Matt Beane
Most folks don’t regularly have a lot of tasks that bump up against the limits of human intelligence, so won’t see it
Some insightful opening remarks, followed by an absolutely stonking keynote by @mattbeane.bsky.social. Crystallised a lot of my worries around preserving expertise in software engineering during the age of GenAI. I have reading to do.
Reposted by Matt Beane
Some insightful opening remarks, followed by an absolutely stonking keynote by @mattbeane.bsky.social. Crystallised a lot of my worries around preserving expertise in software engineering during the age of GenAI. I have reading to do.
Reposted by Matt Beane
www.technologyreview.com/2012/07/18/1...
To attribute complex, intentional design or deeper meaning to simple emergent behaviors of large language models, especially when such behaviors are more likely explained by straightforward technical constraints or training artifacts.
And I can verify on your rule! I was so flabbergasted and honored. Your feedback was rich and so helpful. Remain grateful.
But ads? F*ck that noise. Seriously, straight up evil.
Only/ever the "following" page. Even there things got pretty intolerable towards/around the election, now settled down.
Reposted by Matt Beane
Joe said, "I've got something he can never have"
And I said, "What on earth could that be, Joe?"
And Joe said, "The knowledge that I've got enough"
www.linkedin.com/pulse/kurt-v...