Working on: foundations of AI, logic, dynamical systems, semantics, epistemology.
https://levinhornischer.github.io/
➡️Via neural nets, analog computation re-gains prominence.
❓It lacks universal machines like digital computation: Can they exist?
💡Using Fraïssé limits from logic, we build universal systems.
philpapers.org/rec/HORUAC
➡️Via neural nets, analog computation re-gains prominence.
❓It lacks universal machines like digital computation: Can they exist?
💡Using Fraïssé limits from logic, we build universal systems.
philpapers.org/rec/HORUAC
❓Can neural nets find new voting rules to aggregate preferences?
💡Yes, by optimizing for axioms!
jair.org/index.php/ja...
philpapers.org/rec/HORLHT
❓Can neural nets find new voting rules to aggregate preferences?
💡Yes, by optimizing for axioms!
jair.org/index.php/ja...
philpapers.org/rec/HORLHT
academic.oup.com/mind/advance...
@levinhornischer.bsky.social @standrewsphil.bsky.social @oupphilosophy.bsky.social
academic.oup.com/mind/advance...
@levinhornischer.bsky.social @standrewsphil.bsky.social @oupphilosophy.bsky.social
(Or, How I Stopped Worrying and Learned to Love Relevant Logic Again.)
Download here, Open Access of course:
academic.oup.com/mind/advance...
@levinhornischer.bsky.social @standrewsphil.bsky.social
(Or, How I Stopped Worrying and Learned to Love Relevant Logic Again.)
Download here, Open Access of course:
academic.oup.com/mind/advance...
@levinhornischer.bsky.social @standrewsphil.bsky.social
➡️We propose a new faithful and scalable interpretability method for neural networks.
💡Based on a novel mathematico-philosophical theory of reasons.
arxiv.org/abs/2505.14424
philpapers.org/rec/HORENN
➡️We propose a new faithful and scalable interpretability method for neural networks.
💡Based on a novel mathematico-philosophical theory of reasons.
arxiv.org/abs/2505.14424
philpapers.org/rec/HORENN
❓What if we keep on adding new truth-values 'neither a nor b' and 'both a and b'?
➡️Fun math and fresh ideas for paradoxes!
Paper: doi.org/10.1215/0029...
Preprint: philpapers.org/rec/HORIBA
❓What if we keep on adding new truth-values 'neither a nor b' and 'both a and b'?
➡️Fun math and fresh ideas for paradoxes!
Paper: doi.org/10.1215/0029...
Preprint: philpapers.org/rec/HORIBA
❓What's the logic of perturbation conditionals:
➡️ If we perturb the system into a state where A, it will evolve into a state where B.
💡Surprisingly, it's relevant logic!
Our only excuse to come up with yet another interpretation for the Routley-Meyer semantics, is that we finally nailed it! (Not that I'm partial). 🙂
Preprint here:
philpapers.org/rec/HORTLO-15
❓What's the logic of perturbation conditionals:
➡️ If we perturb the system into a state where A, it will evolve into a state where B.
💡Surprisingly, it's relevant logic!