@leon17328.bsky.social
Reposted
🔥🔥🔥 DO NOT BE DISTRACTED BY MADURO & STAY LOUD!!
🔥🔥🔥 DONALD TRUMP IS GOING DOWN!!
TRUMP & EPSTEIN ARE SEX TRAFFICKERS!!! I’m gonna post this every day so nobody forgets exactly who Pedophile Trump is and why the Epstein files have suddenly disappeared. 🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥
🔥🔥🔥 DONALD TRUMP IS GOING DOWN!!
TRUMP & EPSTEIN ARE SEX TRAFFICKERS!!! I’m gonna post this every day so nobody forgets exactly who Pedophile Trump is and why the Epstein files have suddenly disappeared. 🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥
January 4, 2026 at 12:46 PM
🔥🔥🔥 DO NOT BE DISTRACTED BY MADURO & STAY LOUD!!
🔥🔥🔥 DONALD TRUMP IS GOING DOWN!!
TRUMP & EPSTEIN ARE SEX TRAFFICKERS!!! I’m gonna post this every day so nobody forgets exactly who Pedophile Trump is and why the Epstein files have suddenly disappeared. 🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥
🔥🔥🔥 DONALD TRUMP IS GOING DOWN!!
TRUMP & EPSTEIN ARE SEX TRAFFICKERS!!! I’m gonna post this every day so nobody forgets exactly who Pedophile Trump is and why the Epstein files have suddenly disappeared. 🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥
Reposted
What an Irony!
January 4, 2026 at 1:15 AM
What an Irony!
Reposted
“Did you believe you had sufficient evidence to obtain and sustain a conviction against Donald Trump for interference with the lawful transfer of power?”
JACK SMITH: “Yes.”
JACK SMITH: “Yes.”
December 31, 2025 at 11:09 PM
“Did you believe you had sufficient evidence to obtain and sustain a conviction against Donald Trump for interference with the lawful transfer of power?”
JACK SMITH: “Yes.”
JACK SMITH: “Yes.”
Reposted
Question: But the president’s statements that he believed the election was rife with fraud—those are statements protected by the First Amendment, correct?
Smith: Absolutely not. If they are made to target a lawful government function and are made with knowing falsity, then no, they are not.
Smith: Absolutely not. If they are made to target a lawful government function and are made with knowing falsity, then no, they are not.
December 31, 2025 at 9:04 PM
Question: But the president’s statements that he believed the election was rife with fraud—those are statements protected by the First Amendment, correct?
Smith: Absolutely not. If they are made to target a lawful government function and are made with knowing falsity, then no, they are not.
Smith: Absolutely not. If they are made to target a lawful government function and are made with knowing falsity, then no, they are not.
Reposted
Food for thought
December 23, 2025 at 1:16 PM
Food for thought
Reposted
Dear America
From the U.K. side of the pond you may not appreciate our humour or culture as we may struggle to understand your politics and gun culture BUT for many U.K. folk who support you and hate Trump we will continue to take the piss out of your demented President. (He actually pisses himself)
From the U.K. side of the pond you may not appreciate our humour or culture as we may struggle to understand your politics and gun culture BUT for many U.K. folk who support you and hate Trump we will continue to take the piss out of your demented President. (He actually pisses himself)
December 22, 2025 at 10:44 PM
Dear America
From the U.K. side of the pond you may not appreciate our humour or culture as we may struggle to understand your politics and gun culture BUT for many U.K. folk who support you and hate Trump we will continue to take the piss out of your demented President. (He actually pisses himself)
From the U.K. side of the pond you may not appreciate our humour or culture as we may struggle to understand your politics and gun culture BUT for many U.K. folk who support you and hate Trump we will continue to take the piss out of your demented President. (He actually pisses himself)
Reposted
SO BE IT,CHUMP.......
December 23, 2025 at 9:49 AM
SO BE IT,CHUMP.......