܀𓂃 Kaori Fujisawa 𓈒𓏸𑁍
@layla1988.bsky.social
Forensic and Litigation Consulting
Paralegal
Anti-Money Laundering Counter Fraud, Risk Compliance and Audit Analyst
Criminal Intelligence Analyst
Junior Cyber & Electronic Warfare Modeling & Simulation Engineer
Electronic Warfare Test Engineer
Paralegal
Anti-Money Laundering Counter Fraud, Risk Compliance and Audit Analyst
Criminal Intelligence Analyst
Junior Cyber & Electronic Warfare Modeling & Simulation Engineer
Electronic Warfare Test Engineer
Pinned
I respect everyone's different political positions, beliefs, political ideas, and I will listen
—I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it.
—I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it.
November 17, 2025 at 4:37 AM
Diplomatic reality: Japan never needs to call Taiwan a “country”
Japan can maintain:
• “Taiwan is a region” (外務省の建前)
• “Taiwan contingency is a Japan contingency” (安全保障上の現実)
Because the legal basis is independent of Taiwan’s statehood.
Japan can maintain:
• “Taiwan is a region” (外務省の建前)
• “Taiwan contingency is a Japan contingency” (安全保障上の現実)
Because the legal basis is independent of Taiwan’s statehood.
November 17, 2025 at 2:38 AM
Diplomatic reality: Japan never needs to call Taiwan a “country”
Japan can maintain:
• “Taiwan is a region” (外務省の建前)
• “Taiwan contingency is a Japan contingency” (安全保障上の現実)
Because the legal basis is independent of Taiwan’s statehood.
Japan can maintain:
• “Taiwan is a region” (外務省の建前)
• “Taiwan contingency is a Japan contingency” (安全保障上の現実)
Because the legal basis is independent of Taiwan’s statehood.
Why “Taiwan is not a country!” is irrelevant
Even if Taiwan is treated as:
•“a region,”
•“an area,”
•“a territory,”
Japan’s survival can still be endangered by:
•Blockade
•Missile attacks around Japan
•US forces being targeted
•Sea-lane disruption
Even if Taiwan is treated as:
•“a region,”
•“an area,”
•“a territory,”
Japan’s survival can still be endangered by:
•Blockade
•Missile attacks around Japan
•US forces being targeted
•Sea-lane disruption
Shouting “Taiwan isn’t a country!” only proves you don’t understand Japan’s security legislation.
The law doesn’t require Taiwan to be a country.
It requires Japan’s survival to be at risk—and a Taiwan blockade or conflict does exactly that.
Learn the law before arguing about it
The law doesn’t require Taiwan to be a country.
It requires Japan’s survival to be at risk—and a Taiwan blockade or conflict does exactly that.
Learn the law before arguing about it
November 17, 2025 at 2:34 AM
Why “Taiwan is not a country!” is irrelevant
Even if Taiwan is treated as:
•“a region,”
•“an area,”
•“a territory,”
Japan’s survival can still be endangered by:
•Blockade
•Missile attacks around Japan
•US forces being targeted
•Sea-lane disruption
Even if Taiwan is treated as:
•“a region,”
•“an area,”
•“a territory,”
Japan’s survival can still be endangered by:
•Blockade
•Missile attacks around Japan
•US forces being targeted
•Sea-lane disruption
Japan’s survival-threatening situation has three conditions:
1. A foreign country closely related to Japan comes under armed attack.
2. Japan’s survival and the citizens’ rights are fundamentally threatened.
3. No other appropriate means exist.
The key point:
1. A foreign country closely related to Japan comes under armed attack.
2. Japan’s survival and the citizens’ rights are fundamentally threatened.
3. No other appropriate means exist.
The key point:
November 17, 2025 at 2:31 AM
Japan’s survival-threatening situation has three conditions:
1. A foreign country closely related to Japan comes under armed attack.
2. Japan’s survival and the citizens’ rights are fundamentally threatened.
3. No other appropriate means exist.
The key point:
1. A foreign country closely related to Japan comes under armed attack.
2. Japan’s survival and the citizens’ rights are fundamentally threatened.
3. No other appropriate means exist.
The key point:
Shouting “Taiwan isn’t a country!” only proves you don’t understand Japan’s security legislation.
The law doesn’t require Taiwan to be a country.
It requires Japan’s survival to be at risk—and a Taiwan blockade or conflict does exactly that.
Learn the law before arguing about it
The law doesn’t require Taiwan to be a country.
It requires Japan’s survival to be at risk—and a Taiwan blockade or conflict does exactly that.
Learn the law before arguing about it
November 17, 2025 at 2:19 AM
Shouting “Taiwan isn’t a country!” only proves you don’t understand Japan’s security legislation.
The law doesn’t require Taiwan to be a country.
It requires Japan’s survival to be at risk—and a Taiwan blockade or conflict does exactly that.
Learn the law before arguing about it
The law doesn’t require Taiwan to be a country.
It requires Japan’s survival to be at risk—and a Taiwan blockade or conflict does exactly that.
Learn the law before arguing about it
They claim “ultrabroad bandwidth” and “high-yield nonlinear photonics”.
But what’s missing
Conversion efficiency numbers for each harmonic (dB/W, % conversion, etc.).
Power thresholds and damage / saturation limits.
Noise / coherence / spectral purity of the generated light
But what’s missing
Conversion efficiency numbers for each harmonic (dB/W, % conversion, etc.).
Power thresholds and damage / saturation limits.
Noise / coherence / spectral purity of the generated light
November 16, 2025 at 6:42 PM
They claim “ultrabroad bandwidth” and “high-yield nonlinear photonics”.
But what’s missing
Conversion efficiency numbers for each harmonic (dB/W, % conversion, etc.).
Power thresholds and damage / saturation limits.
Noise / coherence / spectral purity of the generated light
But what’s missing
Conversion efficiency numbers for each harmonic (dB/W, % conversion, etc.).
Power thresholds and damage / saturation limits.
Noise / coherence / spectral purity of the generated light
Welcome to the future:
Flying cars, robot maids, laser surgery.
Still can’t get affordable housing.
Flying cars, robot maids, laser surgery.
Still can’t get affordable housing.
Elon Musk said that a Tesla Optimus humanoid robot would eliminate poverty and provide sustainable abundance.
What are your thoughts?
Lots of news about robots these days.
What are your thoughts?
Lots of news about robots these days.
November 16, 2025 at 6:27 PM
Welcome to the future:
Flying cars, robot maids, laser surgery.
Still can’t get affordable housing.
Flying cars, robot maids, laser surgery.
Still can’t get affordable housing.
Calling on Japan to “show restraint” and retract a factual statement is nothing more than:
asking Japan to silence itself to avoid offending Beijing,
rewarding China’s coercive diplomacy,
pretending Japan’s own security interests don’t exist.
That is not de-escalation.
That is self-disarmament.
asking Japan to silence itself to avoid offending Beijing,
rewarding China’s coercive diplomacy,
pretending Japan’s own security interests don’t exist.
That is not de-escalation.
That is self-disarmament.
November 16, 2025 at 3:04 PM
Calling on Japan to “show restraint” and retract a factual statement is nothing more than:
asking Japan to silence itself to avoid offending Beijing,
rewarding China’s coercive diplomacy,
pretending Japan’s own security interests don’t exist.
That is not de-escalation.
That is self-disarmament.
asking Japan to silence itself to avoid offending Beijing,
rewarding China’s coercive diplomacy,
pretending Japan’s own security interests don’t exist.
That is not de-escalation.
That is self-disarmament.
Japan is already carrying the weight of an increasingly aggressive China.
Adding amateur-hour appeasement schemes on top of that doesn’t help
— it hands Beijing exactly what it wants: a divided and hesitant Japan
Adding amateur-hour appeasement schemes on top of that doesn’t help
— it hands Beijing exactly what it wants: a divided and hesitant Japan
November 16, 2025 at 2:50 PM
Japan is already carrying the weight of an increasingly aggressive China.
Adding amateur-hour appeasement schemes on top of that doesn’t help
— it hands Beijing exactly what it wants: a divided and hesitant Japan
Adding amateur-hour appeasement schemes on top of that doesn’t help
— it hands Beijing exactly what it wants: a divided and hesitant Japan
“China is angry → Japan should appease them → use business delegations → rely on factional intermediaries.”
This is exactly how Beijing wants Japanese politics to think — because it keeps Japan divided, reactive, and permanently managing China’s emotions instead of defending its own interests.
This is exactly how Beijing wants Japanese politics to think — because it keeps Japan divided, reactive, and permanently managing China’s emotions instead of defending its own interests.
November 16, 2025 at 2:45 PM
“China is angry → Japan should appease them → use business delegations → rely on factional intermediaries.”
This is exactly how Beijing wants Japanese politics to think — because it keeps Japan divided, reactive, and permanently managing China’s emotions instead of defending its own interests.
This is exactly how Beijing wants Japanese politics to think — because it keeps Japan divided, reactive, and permanently managing China’s emotions instead of defending its own interests.
China’s “anger” is not an emotion — it is a tool.
It is a negotiating tactic, not a psychological state.
You don’t “calm down” a Malicious strategic actor that uses anger as leverage — you only validate the tool.
It is a negotiating tactic, not a psychological state.
You don’t “calm down” a Malicious strategic actor that uses anger as leverage — you only validate the tool.
November 16, 2025 at 2:39 PM
China’s “anger” is not an emotion — it is a tool.
It is a negotiating tactic, not a psychological state.
You don’t “calm down” a Malicious strategic actor that uses anger as leverage — you only validate the tool.
It is a negotiating tactic, not a psychological state.
You don’t “calm down” a Malicious strategic actor that uses anger as leverage — you only validate the tool.
The question is not “How do we calm China?” but:
How do we prevent China from thinking intimidation works?
A country that threatens Japan over basic defensive statements is not looking for reassurance — it’s testing limits.
Japan’s job is to show those limits are solid.
How do we prevent China from thinking intimidation works?
A country that threatens Japan over basic defensive statements is not looking for reassurance — it’s testing limits.
Japan’s job is to show those limits are solid.
November 16, 2025 at 2:28 PM
The question is not “How do we calm China?” but:
How do we prevent China from thinking intimidation works?
A country that threatens Japan over basic defensive statements is not looking for reassurance — it’s testing limits.
Japan’s job is to show those limits are solid.
How do we prevent China from thinking intimidation works?
A country that threatens Japan over basic defensive statements is not looking for reassurance — it’s testing limits.
Japan’s job is to show those limits are solid.
Today’s situation is fundamentally different from the Abe era.Under Takaichi, Japan is:
clarifying the legal meaning of a Taiwan contingency
China’s anger is not overstyle it’s over Japan refusing to accept Beijing’s red lines.
That cannot be “fixed” with a business delegation.
clarifying the legal meaning of a Taiwan contingency
China’s anger is not overstyle it’s over Japan refusing to accept Beijing’s red lines.
That cannot be “fixed” with a business delegation.
November 16, 2025 at 2:27 PM
Today’s situation is fundamentally different from the Abe era.Under Takaichi, Japan is:
clarifying the legal meaning of a Taiwan contingency
China’s anger is not overstyle it’s over Japan refusing to accept Beijing’s red lines.
That cannot be “fixed” with a business delegation.
clarifying the legal meaning of a Taiwan contingency
China’s anger is not overstyle it’s over Japan refusing to accept Beijing’s red lines.
That cannot be “fixed” with a business delegation.
this is probably the most i've been ecstatic about a movie since sponge out of water 10 years ago. im so happy to finally see spongebob back on the big screen after so long. HYPED
November 16, 2025 at 1:40 PM
this is probably the most i've been ecstatic about a movie since sponge out of water 10 years ago. im so happy to finally see spongebob back on the big screen after so long. HYPED
I have also created two images.
November 16, 2025 at 11:45 AM
I have also created two images.
“So the message is basically:
‘If you disagree with us, we’ll unleash 1.4 billion people, a steel Great Wall, and enough dramatic metaphors to fill a fantasy novel.’
— just industrial-grade cosplay threatening the entire region with a poetic meltdown.
‘If you disagree with us, we’ll unleash 1.4 billion people, a steel Great Wall, and enough dramatic metaphors to fill a fantasy novel.’
— just industrial-grade cosplay threatening the entire region with a poetic meltdown.
November 16, 2025 at 10:02 AM
“So the message is basically:
‘If you disagree with us, we’ll unleash 1.4 billion people, a steel Great Wall, and enough dramatic metaphors to fill a fantasy novel.’
— just industrial-grade cosplay threatening the entire region with a poetic meltdown.
‘If you disagree with us, we’ll unleash 1.4 billion people, a steel Great Wall, and enough dramatic metaphors to fill a fantasy novel.’
— just industrial-grade cosplay threatening the entire region with a poetic meltdown.
48.8% of respondents are in favour of exercising Japan’s right to collective self-defence if Taiwan is attacked by China; 44.2% are against.
Japanese divided on military response to China over Taiwan, Kyodo poll shows reut.rs/43uViB8
Japanese divided on military response to China over Taiwan, Kyodo poll shows
The Japanese public is divided on whether Japan should exercise its right to collective self-defence if China attacks Taiwan, a Kyodo news agency poll found on Sunday.
reut.rs
November 16, 2025 at 9:12 AM
48.8% of respondents are in favour of exercising Japan’s right to collective self-defence if Taiwan is attacked by China; 44.2% are against.
@michaelturton.bsky.social
So while the President technically wields very broad foreign-policy powers, in this case I would say:
If a U.S. President attempted to unilaterally declare “Taiwan is Chinese sovereign territory” under PRC the move would be:
So while the President technically wields very broad foreign-policy powers, in this case I would say:
If a U.S. President attempted to unilaterally declare “Taiwan is Chinese sovereign territory” under PRC the move would be:
November 16, 2025 at 6:13 AM
@michaelturton.bsky.social
So while the President technically wields very broad foreign-policy powers, in this case I would say:
If a U.S. President attempted to unilaterally declare “Taiwan is Chinese sovereign territory” under PRC the move would be:
So while the President technically wields very broad foreign-policy powers, in this case I would say:
If a U.S. President attempted to unilaterally declare “Taiwan is Chinese sovereign territory” under PRC the move would be:
nick's tweet (blame-shift, moral high-ground, victimhood framing) consistent with PRC public diplomacy and information operations.
November 16, 2025 at 5:05 AM
nick's tweet (blame-shift, moral high-ground, victimhood framing) consistent with PRC public diplomacy and information operations.
Key point:
This was not a final territorial settlement.
It was a wartime ultimatum, not a legally binding border treaty.
The image with red text is a reply.
This was not a final territorial settlement.
It was a wartime ultimatum, not a legally binding border treaty.
The image with red text is a reply.
November 16, 2025 at 2:06 AM
Key point:
This was not a final territorial settlement.
It was a wartime ultimatum, not a legally binding border treaty.
The image with red text is a reply.
This was not a final territorial settlement.
It was a wartime ultimatum, not a legally binding border treaty.
The image with red text is a reply.
@USWPColby Do you think this ratio is still too low?
November 16, 2025 at 1:18 AM
@USWPColby Do you think this ratio is still too low?
I wonder what kind of support for what kind of "operations" Alibaba provides through SCMP
November 15, 2025 at 7:30 PM
I wonder what kind of support for what kind of "operations" Alibaba provides through SCMP
This is how I replied to her.
November 15, 2025 at 7:16 PM
This is how I replied to her.