So the oatcake didn't involve sugar, at least. Are they cheap there? I don't think of them as super-expensive (when I was a student, I'd eat 2 packets i.e. 12 oatcakes) for lunch, but 4 packets = roughly the cost of a standard supermarket pre-sliced bread, so they're not super-cheap either.
January 6, 2026 at 6:04 PM
So the oatcake didn't involve sugar, at least. Are they cheap there? I don't think of them as super-expensive (when I was a student, I'd eat 2 packets i.e. 12 oatcakes) for lunch, but 4 packets = roughly the cost of a standard supermarket pre-sliced bread, so they're not super-cheap either.
You don't have to give them your data. I sometimes get a pop-up asking me to do things, but you can click to minimise it and then click on something else to make it go away completely. (Sorry, that's not very descriptive, but it wasn't appearing for me just now, so I couldn't check the details.)
January 6, 2026 at 10:08 AM
You don't have to give them your data. I sometimes get a pop-up asking me to do things, but you can click to minimise it and then click on something else to make it go away completely. (Sorry, that's not very descriptive, but it wasn't appearing for me just now, so I couldn't check the details.)
And here's something from Robert Louis Stevenson's "A Gossip on Romance" www.online-literature.com/stevenson/es... (where it means more "adventure" than necessarily about love):
January 5, 2026 at 7:38 PM
And here's something from Robert Louis Stevenson's "A Gossip on Romance" www.online-literature.com/stevenson/es... (where it means more "adventure" than necessarily about love):
That's not part of a definition of popular/genre romance that I've come across. However, I think that it sounds like the utopia-associated ideas about romance here (I can only see one page, though). Depends which texts are meant by "romance", of course: ancient Greek, chivalric, etc
That's not part of a definition of popular/genre romance that I've come across. However, I think that it sounds like the utopia-associated ideas about romance here (I can only see one page, though). Depends which texts are meant by "romance", of course: ancient Greek, chivalric, etc
Deane argues that romance readers sought a bit of respectability by rejecting the "bodice rippers" of the past, but the dark romance subgenre brings back elements of that past, for the 21st century.
January 5, 2026 at 1:48 PM
Deane argues that romance readers sought a bit of respectability by rejecting the "bodice rippers" of the past, but the dark romance subgenre brings back elements of that past, for the 21st century.
I did check the webpage but I couldn't see an answer. I'm getting the impression that the grid (of wood?) on top of the brickwork is there all the time but is it an original part of the structure? Is it wood that plants grow up? Or is it there to help preserve the building?
January 5, 2026 at 12:46 PM
I did check the webpage but I couldn't see an answer. I'm getting the impression that the grid (of wood?) on top of the brickwork is there all the time but is it an original part of the structure? Is it wood that plants grow up? Or is it there to help preserve the building?
Today's news about Venezuela is reminding me of my feelings about Suzanne Brockmann's Get Lucky (2000). Not really trying to single that novel/author out, just using it as an example of how the US was/is portrayed in a lot of contemporary romance, I assume reflecting a lot of US self-perception.
January 3, 2026 at 4:54 PM
Today's news about Venezuela is reminding me of my feelings about Suzanne Brockmann's Get Lucky (2000). Not really trying to single that novel/author out, just using it as an example of how the US was/is portrayed in a lot of contemporary romance, I assume reflecting a lot of US self-perception.
Yes, writing "when everybody — gay men or straight women — is discouraged from thinking more critically about the media they consume, nobody wins" is ironic given the first paragraph's insistence, as you say, on "the smut" and the insistence that the show "only has glimpses of true complexity".
January 2, 2026 at 8:42 PM
Yes, writing "when everybody — gay men or straight women — is discouraged from thinking more critically about the media they consume, nobody wins" is ironic given the first paragraph's insistence, as you say, on "the smut" and the insistence that the show "only has glimpses of true complexity".