Kristina Jessen Hansen
kristinajh.bsky.social
Kristina Jessen Hansen
@kristinajh.bsky.social
Associate Professor, Aalborg University, Political Psychology
Reposted by Kristina Jessen Hansen
Last week, we launched the world's ultimate guide to climate solutions -- the Drawdown Explorer.

People thought we were nuts to give it (and all the underlying data) away for free. But we insisted.

During a crisis, you don't put crucial data behind a paywall.
September 29, 2025 at 4:33 PM
Are you my department's new full professor in International and/or European Politics from Jan 2026? lnkd.in/duWeqhJ4

www.stillinger.aau.dk/videnskabeli...
Professor of International or European Politics
At The Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities, Department of Politics and Society one or more positions as full professor of International and/or European...
www.stillinger.aau.dk
July 4, 2025 at 10:49 AM
Reposted by Kristina Jessen Hansen
When politicians use simple language, citizens understand more and see them as less elite.

New paper with @danbischof.bsky.social out in @thejop.bsky.social!

doi.org/10.1086/736693
Can Simple Language Affect Voters' Political Knowledge and Their Beliefs About Politicians? | The Journal of Politics: Vol 0, No ja
www.journals.uchicago.edu
May 16, 2025 at 6:02 AM
Reposted by Kristina Jessen Hansen
Selecting Out of “Politics”: The Self-Fulfilling Role of Conflict Expectation

Selecting Out of “Politics”: The Self-Fulfilling Role of Conflict Expectation By Eric Groenendyk, University of Memphis; Yanna Krupnikov, University of Michigan; John Barry Ryan, University of Michigan; Elizabeth C.…
Selecting Out of “Politics”: The Self-Fulfilling Role of Conflict Expectation
Selecting Out of “Politics”: The Self-Fulfilling Role of Conflict Expectation By Eric Groenendyk, University of Memphis; Yanna Krupnikov, University of Michigan; John Barry Ryan, University of Michigan; Elizabeth C. Connors, University of South Carolina. In recent decades, the term “politics” has become almost synonymous with conflict. Results from eight studies show that individuals averse to conflict tend to select out of surveys and discussions explicitly labeled as “political.” This suggests that the inferences researchers draw from “political” surveys, as well as the impressions average Americans draw from explicitly “political” discussions, will be systematically biased toward conflict.
politicalsciencenow.com
May 8, 2025 at 2:00 PM
Reposted by Kristina Jessen Hansen
🧵New paper out in Cognition

Why do people moralize harmless carnal sins (e.g. gluttony, masturbation)?

@danielnettle.bsky.social & I find that these behaviors activate reciprocity-based moral judgment—no need for a distinct "purity" module.

50 days free link: authors.elsevier.com/a/1l18D2Hx2-...
May 6, 2025 at 9:45 AM
Reposted by Kristina Jessen Hansen
🧵 THREAD: Can a short online intervention help defend democracy against partisan polarization?

In our new study - just published in the @bjpols.bsky.social - my colleagues and I tested this question across 33 countries 🌍 with over 41,000 participants 🧑‍🤝‍🧑.

Here’s what we found 👇
April 24, 2025 at 11:17 AM