John Fallon
banner
john-fallon-econ.com
John Fallon
@john-fallon-econ.com
BU Econ PhD candidate. Labor, Education.

www.john-fallon-econ.com
Pinned
I'm John Fallon, a labor economist on the job market. My JMP uncovers something wild: when chiropractors got licensed in the early 1900s, medical boards responded by making it HARDER to become a doctor.

Why would competition lead to stricter regulations?
🧵

john-fallon-econ.com

(1/9)
Reposted by John Fallon
🚨📰New WP 🚨📰
How does social housing design affect neighborhoods decades later? We study London gangs to show that postwar urban planning—specifically high-rise public housing construction—had lasting effects on gang formation
@cep-lse.bsky.social
February 5, 2026 at 11:50 AM
Reposted by John Fallon
🧵 New version of our paper (@bcegerod.bsky.social) is finally online: "How Many is Enough? Sample Size in Staggered Difference-in-Differences Designs"
We show that even well-identified DiD studies are often underpowered; sample sizes needed are surprisingly large
Paper: osf.io/preprints/os... 1/6
February 3, 2026 at 2:46 PM
Reposted by John Fallon
Today's cool young researcher #econtwitter #econsky is @karansinghal93 @uni_lu @liserinlux who works on topics related to gender, labor + social protection

February 2, 2026 at 4:47 PM
Reposted by John Fallon
New JOE Listings were posted today (02-01-2026).
February 1, 2026 at 11:30 PM
Reposted by John Fallon
📣Hi #EconSky! I am on the job market! 📣
My JMP builds a 20-year panel showing an after-school care reform increased university grad. rates. 🎓
The key: moving children from home 🏠 to care centers 🧑‍🧒‍🧒, where peer interactions shaped preferences and beliefs — not skills🧮.

For more: sevinkaytan.com
November 5, 2025 at 11:34 AM
Could you use the IRB at one institution and then test at other IRBs?
January 12, 2026 at 8:37 PM
Reposted by John Fallon
I was delighted to have the opportunity to present my Job Market Paper, 'The Price of Parenthood: Childcare Costs and Fertility' at the ASSA Annual Meeting in Philadelphia #ASSA2026 in a great session on fertility. Draft available on my website: abigaildow.com
January 8, 2026 at 4:49 PM
I know today's news is heavy.

If you're at #ASSA2026 and looking to engage with research this morning, I'm presenting in the Peer Effects in Education session at 10:15 AM, Philadelphia Convention Center, 107-AB.

www.aeaweb.org/conference/2...
January 3, 2026 at 2:19 PM
Reposted by John Fallon
Putting together the list of papers and posters that I want to see at the ASSA Annual Meeting, and this poster session project (by @michaelbriskin.bsky.social) looks interesting

Paper is here: mbbriskin.github.io/files/Briski...
January 2, 2026 at 8:37 PM
Reposted by John Fallon
Joining the throng of economists taking a delayed Amtrak to PHL today to present my JMP at #ASSA2026!

📍 Philadelphia Convention Center, 204-A (Elementary & Secondary Education)
⏰ Sunday, 1/4, 10:15-12:15

#EconConf
👋 I'm Danielle, and I'm on the #econjobmarket this year!

Let's start with a student describing her segregated school:

"The school felt temporary. Built like a warehouse with aluminum siding . . . I had a slipshod education"

The twist? The student is white, and her school is private.

A JMP 🧵 -->
January 2, 2026 at 9:10 PM
ICYMI: Do workers actually learn from collaboration, or just benefit from the help?

New paper uses teacher co-teaching to answer this question. Spoiler: genuine skill transfer is real, but partner experience matters a lot.
john-fallon-econ.com/Files/LBDT.pdf
#ASSA2026 #EconSky
December 29, 2025 at 4:48 PM
Implications beyond education: Any workplace where workers can transfer knowledge may benefit from similar programs.

Collaboration's value isn't just immediate productivity—it's lasting skill development.

Full paper: john-fallon-econ.com

Feedback welcome! See you at #ASSA2026! #EconSky
John Fallon
john-fallon-econ.com
December 26, 2025 at 6:37 PM
Something about highly experienced teachers seems to help more. Maybe accumulated tacit knowledge transfers through close interaction?

Effects peak around 15-20 years of partner experience, then decline slightly.
December 26, 2025 at 6:37 PM
But here's the problem: Schools most commonly pair two inexperienced teachers together.

Only highly experienced partners (16+ years) produce lasting benefits. Organizations are missing opportunities to accelerate skill development through strategic pairing.
December 26, 2025 at 6:37 PM
Do pairs improve at working together over time?

Without controls, longer duration predicts better outcomes. With teacher fixed effects, this reverses—better teachers stay together; pairs don't improve through practice.

May even be a cost to not managing a class alone.
December 26, 2025 at 6:37 PM
We know teachers improve with experience (Papay & @matthewakraft.com 2015), but how? And can we accelerate it?

Strategic collaboration might be one answer—pairing with experienced colleagues could compress years of learning-by-doing into shorter periods.
December 26, 2025 at 6:37 PM
Context: 0.10 standard deviations is larger than typical effects from certification type or National Board Certification (Kane et al. 2008; Clotfelter et al. 2007; @cedr.bsky.social & Brewer 2000).

Lasting productivity gains from brief collaboration—genuine skill transfer, not just temporary help!
December 26, 2025 at 6:37 PM
Main result: Teachers paired with highly experienced special ed colleagues (16+ years) improve by 0.10 standard deviations—and this persists after returning to solo teaching.

Partners with 0-7 or 8-15 years show no lasting benefit. The experience level matters.
December 26, 2025 at 6:37 PM
Advantage: I track general education teachers before pairing with a special ed teacher, during collaboration, and after returning to solo teaching.

This lets me separate temporary help from genuine skill transfer.

Most pairs break up after a year, so I observe many returning to solo classrooms.
December 26, 2025 at 6:37 PM
The setting: Co-teaching pairs one general education teacher with one special education teacher in the same classroom (to comply with inclusion mandates).

Assignment driven by special ed enrollment & scheduling. Since it happens early in careers, quality is less well known—good for identification!
December 26, 2025 at 6:37 PM
🚨🚨🚨New working paper! 🚨🚨🚨

"Learning by Doing (Together): Collaboration and Teacher Skill Formation"

Do workers genuinely learn from collaboration, or just benefit while working together? I study teacher partnerships to find out.

Paper: john-fallon-econ.com

Presenting at #ASSA2026 #EconSky

1/10
December 26, 2025 at 6:37 PM
This matters beyond just doctors and chiropractors. Think:

Nurse practitioners vs doctors

Psychologists vs LICSWs

Any profession where substitutes have separate boards

Competitive licensing changes everything about how we evaluate regulation.

Full Paper: john-fallon-econ.com/Files/JMP.pdf
(9/9)
November 24, 2025 at 8:55 PM
The model estimates reveal that boards act like profit-maximizing cartels (Stackelberg equilibrium), not benevolent regulators.

This is regulatory capture in action - boards prioritize incumbent profits over public welfare.

(8/9)
November 24, 2025 at 8:52 PM
So why would raising YOUR barriers help when competitors enter?

I build a structural model showing boards want to engage in "cream-skimming" - they want to set standards just high enough to poach high-ability workers from rival professions.

(7/9)
November 24, 2025 at 8:50 PM
The tricky part: does licensing cause these changes, or do areas with more chiropractors just adopt licensing?

I use an IV strategy with non-bordering counties (F-stats 338-699) and find chiropractors actually INCREASED 2-12 per 100k despite now facing barriers.

(6/9)
November 24, 2025 at 8:48 PM