Jacg
jacg1.bsky.social
Jacg
@jacg1.bsky.social
Member of the tofu eating wokerati. Interested in US & UK politics. Twitter refugee seeking asylum. Enjoy foreign drama series & walking my dachshunds. Favourite food is proper Sicilian cannoli
I had a shark which was great for about 8 months then blew up. We’ve got a James that’s lasted years. The bag is a pain but it’s still going strong. Also got a Ewbank for the in between hoovers
February 4, 2026 at 7:00 PM
…in a mac leering at girls. They dress nicely, have £££, nice car etc. so they get away with it
February 4, 2026 at 6:56 PM
You are correct. Also because they’ve achieved some sort of status - wealthy, a celebrity, landed gentry, the boss etc, it lends them some sort of credibility, eg ‘What??? Savile?? Him off the telly? Does all that charity work? Him? No way!!!’

It’s because they don’t look like a dirty old guy…
February 4, 2026 at 6:56 PM
Moses Mike Grindr Johnson hasn’t seen anything about the Epstein files so cannot comment
February 3, 2026 at 6:45 PM
He’s got that woman who follows him around printing off RW positive stories about him
February 3, 2026 at 5:47 AM
You’d think with all those tech bros at Yam Tits’ beck & call at least one of them would’ve invented some sort of easy redactor system. I mean, what are they & AI good for??
February 2, 2026 at 11:26 PM
What I am looking forward to is seeing where the red vote has been over diluted. Hilarious if that’s what ends up turning TX blue
February 2, 2026 at 9:13 PM
May still come under the Proceeds of Crime Act
February 2, 2026 at 7:53 PM
Michelle Mone for one
February 2, 2026 at 7:07 PM
💯 agree
February 2, 2026 at 10:07 AM
They most certainly do
February 2, 2026 at 10:06 AM
They should ask the question & a colleague follow up then if he insults one of them, they should walk out. Everyone has the right to not be abused in their workplace plus Yam Tits won’t know what to do with himself as no publicity to him is like a dagger to his heart
February 1, 2026 at 4:06 PM
Ok 👍
February 1, 2026 at 4:02 PM
She had rights to appeal until 2024. Just because she’s not directly mentioned in the document doesn’t mean it’s not potential evidence against her
February 1, 2026 at 3:20 PM
…Off on others pending whenever she would be located & not tip her off.

Also, I think 5 or 6 of JE’s co-conspirators had immunity following that crappy case in FL. That’s something that should’ve been investigated by Bill Barr/Jeff Sessions/ the big dick toilet guy
February 1, 2026 at 3:19 PM
Bollocks to you too! None of this evidence could be used in other cases whilst Maxwell’s case was sub judice as it would prejudice it.

There’s an argument for saying more people should’ve been indicted with her but she went into hiding for two years before being caught so difficult to hold …
February 1, 2026 at 3:19 PM
They care about instant gratification. That’s it. What can they get out of the situation in front of them today & don’t think about what’s happening next week or next year.
There’ll always be someone to abuse, some mark, some grift until the next one.
February 1, 2026 at 3:12 PM
…the latter but everyone was too blind to see it 🤷

A bit like how Europe used to see the US.

So in a way, maybe it’s a good thing to have the scales removed from our eyes. That way, we can now see things for what they are & deal with that
February 1, 2026 at 3:08 PM
The term ‘elite’ has changed meanings recently. It’s gone from meaning someone who, either on their own merits or through inheritance, has attained a level of respect & financial status.
Someone to aspire to.
Now, it means self-serving, arrogant, out of touch.

Truth is they probably always were..
February 1, 2026 at 3:08 PM
At the time when Garland was AG, Maxwell was on trial & had rights to appeal still so all of this evidence was under seal until January last year, by which time Yam Tits was President-elect
February 1, 2026 at 3:00 PM
…even under investigation let alone suffered any penalty.
February 1, 2026 at 2:58 PM
That is the issue. If AW testifies, whether voluntarily or otherwise, why aren’t others being held to account? In a way, the UK has sought to penalise AW & PM (though not far enough, you might say). Plus it’s only a British woman currently serving any penalty in the US.
Not one US citizen is…
February 1, 2026 at 2:58 PM
The US has a robust extradition policy & AW is just a mere citizen now so none of the diplomatic, political difficulties that there would’ve been if he was still a prince
February 1, 2026 at 2:33 PM
I get that they enjoy the hedonism & if you’ve got so much money & power, what else would cause them the same level of excitement but it shows the selfishness & surprising lack of foresight for men who are supposed to be elite
February 1, 2026 at 2:31 PM
Isn’t she the one who got arse implants & whose cousin’s bollocks swelled up like coconuts because of the covid vaccine? Looks like the signs were all there
February 1, 2026 at 2:14 PM