Jonas Ineichen
ineichenjonas.bsky.social
Jonas Ineichen
@ineichenjonas.bsky.social
PhD Candidate in Political Science @ University of Zurich. Einwohnerrat SP Emmen
Dokumentationen von @srf sind i.d.R. gut recherchiert, kritisch und ordnen ein Thema in einen grösseren Kontext ein. Auf die 1.5 stündige Doku-Serie zu Schönheitsoperationen trifft leider keiner dieser Punkte zu. In 1.5 Stunden gibt es eine Person, die
von Unzufriedenheit

youtu.be/Y_ExphsIcno?...
Alles für die Schönheit – Perfektion dank Spritze und Skalpell | Folge 1 | DOK | SRF
YouTube video by SRF Dokus & Reportagen
youtu.be
February 7, 2025 at 11:15 PM
Reposted by Jonas Ineichen
Fact-checking wasn’t “biased” against conservatives. Conservatives just shared more false content. If there’s a sportsball game and one team fouls four times as much, it’s not “biased” for the ref to call four times as many fouls against that team.
🚨In Nature🚨
Meta is dropping fact-checking to avoid anti-conservative bias- but is there actually evidence of bias?
We this test empirically & find that conservatives
* ARE suspended more
* BUT share more misinfo
So suspension isn't necessarily evidence of bias www.nature.com/articles/s41...
Differences in misinformation sharing can lead to politically asymmetric sanctions - Nature
We find that conservatives tend to share more low-quality news through social media than liberals, and so even if technology companies enact politically neutral anti-misinformation policies, political...
www.nature.com
January 7, 2025 at 3:27 PM