Ian Millhiser
@imillhiser.bsky.social
Senior Correspondent, Vox. The Supreme Court is bad, y'all.
The Supreme Court just handed Trump a rare — and very significant — loss www.vox.com/politics/473...
The Supreme Court just handed Trump a rare — and very significant — loss
Even some of the Court’s Republicans ruled that his attempt to use troops against US citizens went too far.
www.vox.com
December 23, 2025 at 9:51 PM
The Supreme Court just handed Trump a rare — and very significant — loss www.vox.com/politics/473...
The culture war is consuming the Supreme Court www.vox.com/politics/473...
The culture war is consuming the Supreme Court
The Court’s overall docket is shrinking, even as it hears more and more cases dealing with Republican cultural grievances.
www.vox.com
December 23, 2025 at 2:16 PM
The culture war is consuming the Supreme Court www.vox.com/politics/473...
The case against releasing the Epstein files www.vox.com/policy/46946...
The case against releasing the Epstein files
DOJ has strong norms against releasing information outside of a criminal trial, and for good reasons.
www.vox.com
December 19, 2025 at 3:27 PM
The case against releasing the Epstein files www.vox.com/policy/46946...
The Supreme Court sounds surprisingly open to a case against a death sentence www.vox.com/politics/471...
The Supreme Court sounds surprisingly open to a case against a death sentence
The justices seemed to reject Justice Neil Gorsuch’s earlier call for major changes to the rules governing punishment.
www.vox.com
December 10, 2025 at 8:06 PM
The Supreme Court sounds surprisingly open to a case against a death sentence www.vox.com/politics/471...
How the Supreme Court is using Trump to grab more power for itself www.vox.com/politics/471...
How the Supreme Court is using Trump to grab more power for itself
The Court’s GOP majority wants grow Trump’s authority, but also give itself a veto power over the president.
www.vox.com
December 8, 2025 at 7:00 PM
How the Supreme Court is using Trump to grab more power for itself www.vox.com/politics/471...
The Supreme Court just made gerrymandering nearly untouchable www.vox.com/politics/471...
The Supreme Court just made gerrymandering nearly untouchable
The Court’s Texas decision is a victory for Republicans, and it is a terrible blow to all gerrymandering plaintiffs.
www.vox.com
December 5, 2025 at 4:27 PM
The Supreme Court just made gerrymandering nearly untouchable www.vox.com/politics/471...
Republicans want the Supreme Court to save them from their own inept mistake www.vox.com/politics/470...
Republicans want the Supreme Court to save them from their own inept mistake
Meanwhile, Texas Republicans want to immunize their gerrymander from constitutional review.
www.vox.com
December 2, 2025 at 8:32 PM
Republicans want the Supreme Court to save them from their own inept mistake www.vox.com/politics/470...
Reposted by Ian Millhiser
I was skeptical of this when Ian pitched it but came out convinced that it’s at least worth considering, especially the danger to victims and witnesses who spoke to DOJ about the horrors of their lives, and may now face of retribution from some of the most powerful people in the world.
November 19, 2025 at 2:18 AM
I was skeptical of this when Ian pitched it but came out convinced that it’s at least worth considering, especially the danger to victims and witnesses who spoke to DOJ about the horrors of their lives, and may now face of retribution from some of the most powerful people in the world.
Reposted by Ian Millhiser
"There is danger, however, in requiring the Justice Department to reveal the fruits of a criminal investigation — even in a case as compelling and as egregious as Epstein’s," writes @imillhiser.bsky.social.
Here's why 👇
Here's why 👇
The case against releasing the Epstein files
DOJ has strong norms against releasing information outside of a criminal trial, and for good reasons.
voxdotcom.visitlink.me
November 18, 2025 at 10:12 PM
"There is danger, however, in requiring the Justice Department to reveal the fruits of a criminal investigation — even in a case as compelling and as egregious as Epstein’s," writes @imillhiser.bsky.social.
Here's why 👇
Here's why 👇
The case against releasing the Epstein files www.vox.com/policy/46946...
The case against releasing the Epstein files
DOJ has strong norms against releasing information outside of a criminal trial, and for good reasons.
www.vox.com
November 18, 2025 at 10:05 PM
The case against releasing the Epstein files www.vox.com/policy/46946...
Oops! Trump’s Justice Department may have accidentally handed Democrats five House seats
www.vox.com/politics/469...
www.vox.com/politics/469...
Trump’s Justice Department may have accidentally handed Democrats five House seats
Oops.
www.vox.com
November 18, 2025 at 9:15 PM
Oops! Trump’s Justice Department may have accidentally handed Democrats five House seats
www.vox.com/politics/469...
www.vox.com/politics/469...
The Supreme Court is about to rule on whether Trump can use troops against Americans www.vox.com/politics/468...
The Supreme Court is about to rule on whether Trump can use troops against Americans
Thus far, the justices have signaled they may not let him — yet.
www.vox.com
November 14, 2025 at 7:16 PM
The Supreme Court is about to rule on whether Trump can use troops against Americans www.vox.com/politics/468...
The Supreme Court will decide whether to toss out thousands of ballots www.vox.com/politics/468...
The Supreme Court will decide whether to toss out thousands of ballots
The Republican Party’s arguments in Watson v. RNC is probably too much even for this Supreme Court.
www.vox.com
November 10, 2025 at 9:44 PM
The Supreme Court will decide whether to toss out thousands of ballots www.vox.com/politics/468...
A Supreme Court case about dreadlocks could end up gutting Medicaid www.vox.com/politics/468...
A Supreme Court case about dreadlocks could end up gutting Medicaid
The Republican justices find something they care about more than they care about religion.
www.vox.com
November 10, 2025 at 8:45 PM
A Supreme Court case about dreadlocks could end up gutting Medicaid www.vox.com/politics/468...
The Supreme Court might actually stand up to Trump www.vox.com/politics/467...
The Supreme Court might actually stand up to Trump
Trump’s tariffs appear to be in trouble.
www.vox.com
November 5, 2025 at 7:10 PM
The Supreme Court might actually stand up to Trump www.vox.com/politics/467...
The most horrifying religion case to hit the Supreme Court in years is also one of the hardest www.vox.com/politics/467...
The most horrifying religion case to hit the Supreme Court in years is also one of the hardest
The Court has made a hash of its religion decisions. Damon Landor may be the newest victim of that uncertainty.
www.vox.com
November 5, 2025 at 2:01 PM
The most horrifying religion case to hit the Supreme Court in years is also one of the hardest www.vox.com/politics/467...
Trump’s imperial presidency is Dick Cheney’s final legacy www.vox.com/politics/467...
Trump’s imperial presidency is Dick Cheney’s final legacy
Cheney’s final political act was patriotism, but his life’s work was autocracy.
www.vox.com
November 4, 2025 at 7:43 PM
Trump’s imperial presidency is Dick Cheney’s final legacy www.vox.com/politics/467...
A new Supreme Court case could turn the National Guard into Trump’s personal army www.vox.com/politics/465...
A new Supreme Court case could turn the National Guard into Trump’s personal army
The justices could hand Trump the power to deploy troops anywhere, anytime — and against Americans.
www.vox.com
October 21, 2025 at 5:50 PM
A new Supreme Court case could turn the National Guard into Trump’s personal army www.vox.com/politics/465...
Reposted by Ian Millhiser
Really good overview from @imillhiser.bsky.social of the paths to accountability for ICE in court—and how the Supreme Court has blocked off some (but not all) of them.
I may be slightly more optimistic than Ian that the Federal Tort Claims Act remains a viable option. www.vox.com/politics/464...
I may be slightly more optimistic than Ian that the Federal Tort Claims Act remains a viable option. www.vox.com/politics/464...
How the Supreme Court placed ICE above the law
Broadly, there are 5 ways to constrain rogue federal law enforcement agents. The Supreme Court nuked 3 of them.
www.vox.com
October 20, 2025 at 5:14 PM
Really good overview from @imillhiser.bsky.social of the paths to accountability for ICE in court—and how the Supreme Court has blocked off some (but not all) of them.
I may be slightly more optimistic than Ian that the Federal Tort Claims Act remains a viable option. www.vox.com/politics/464...
I may be slightly more optimistic than Ian that the Federal Tort Claims Act remains a viable option. www.vox.com/politics/464...
How the Supreme Court placed ICE above the law www.vox.com/politics/464...
How the Supreme Court placed ICE above the law
Broadly, there are 5 ways to constrain rogue federal law enforcement agents. The Supreme Court nuked 3 of them.
www.vox.com
October 20, 2025 at 1:40 PM
How the Supreme Court placed ICE above the law www.vox.com/politics/464...
The Republican justices hunt for a reason to gut America’s most successful civil rights law www.vox.com/politics/464...
It sure looks like the Voting Rights Act is doomed
The Republican justices hunt for a reason to gut America’s most successful civil rights law.
www.vox.com
October 15, 2025 at 6:02 PM
The Republican justices hunt for a reason to gut America’s most successful civil rights law www.vox.com/politics/464...
It sure looks like the Voting Rights Act is doomed www.vox.com/politics/464...
It sure looks like the Voting Rights Act is doomed
The Republican justices hunt for a reason to gut America’s most successful civil rights law.
www.vox.com
October 15, 2025 at 6:02 PM
It sure looks like the Voting Rights Act is doomed www.vox.com/politics/464...
Reposted by Ian Millhiser
When you cannot trust the justices to apply the law equally, one wonders how they could weaponize one of America's most righteous and effective laws to help their own political party and to hurt their political enemies. Troubling piece from @imillhiser.bsky.social: www.vox.com/politics/464...
The uncomfortable problem with America’s greatest civil rights law
Maybe we don’t want to centralize power over elections in this particular federal government?
www.vox.com
October 14, 2025 at 1:51 PM
When you cannot trust the justices to apply the law equally, one wonders how they could weaponize one of America's most righteous and effective laws to help their own political party and to hurt their political enemies. Troubling piece from @imillhiser.bsky.social: www.vox.com/politics/464...
I hate every single word of this piece I just put up. But, given how unapologetically partisan the courts have become, I don't see how I could reach any other conclusion. www.vox.com/politics/464...
The uncomfortable problem with America’s greatest civil rights law
Maybe we don’t want to centralize power over elections in this particular federal government?
www.vox.com
October 14, 2025 at 1:28 PM
I hate every single word of this piece I just put up. But, given how unapologetically partisan the courts have become, I don't see how I could reach any other conclusion. www.vox.com/politics/464...
The uncomfortable problem with America’s greatest civil rights law www.vox.com/politics/464...
The uncomfortable problem with America’s greatest civil rights law
Maybe we don’t want to centralize power over elections in this particular federal government?
www.vox.com
October 14, 2025 at 12:13 PM
The uncomfortable problem with America’s greatest civil rights law www.vox.com/politics/464...