Gwenda Schlundt Bodien
banner
gsb57.bsky.social
Gwenda Schlundt Bodien
@gsb57.bsky.social
Mede-ontwikkelaar van de progressiegerichte benadering. Centrum Progressiegericht Werken
Reposted by Gwenda Schlundt Bodien
In a new paper we analyzed 43,932 randomized news headlines and found causal evidence in support of the out-group animosity hypothesis:

Negativity about out-groups boosted engagement by 14.1%, compared to just 1.6% for negativity about in-groups.
osf.io/preprints/ps...
March 5, 2025 at 6:55 PM
Reposted by Gwenda Schlundt Bodien
Here’s an idea: regeer niet met de PVV.
February 20, 2025 at 8:02 AM
Reposted by Gwenda Schlundt Bodien
The spread of misinformation and disinformation top the WEF short-term global risk report for 2025. www.weforum.org/publications...
January 26, 2025 at 10:04 AM
Reposted by Gwenda Schlundt Bodien
"Haidt’s retreat from curiosity and complexity reaches its apex in The Anxious Generation. The book missed so many opportunities to explore with sincerity and respect how young people use the tools around them to cope with misery and to seek opportunity..." (1/3) newrepublic.com/article/1903...
Are Cell Phones Really Destroying Kids’ Mental Health?
Jonathan Haidt once heralded an “ultrasocial” world. Now he’s one of social media’s most prominent critics.
newrepublic.com
January 26, 2025 at 3:27 PM
Reposted by Gwenda Schlundt Bodien
This meta-analysis of eHealth interventions to promote physical activity in young, middle-aged, and late middle-aged adults with obesity or overweight showed a) small to medium effects, and b) moderation by weight status and ethnicity;
buff.ly
January 13, 2025 at 10:02 AM
Reposted by Gwenda Schlundt Bodien
How well does academic performance (GPA, class rank, instructor evaluations) predict job performance?

Contrary to some recent headlines, it’s actually pretty good! Here are a few highlights from a recent meta-analysis 🧵, available here: doi.org/10.1037/apl0...
December 27, 2024 at 7:29 PM
Reposted by Gwenda Schlundt Bodien
A match NOT made in heaven? This review shows that human–AI combinations performed worse than the best of humans or AI alone, although when humans outperformed AI alone, there were performance gains in the combination, but when AI outperformed humans alone, there were losses
When combinations of humans and AI are useful: A systematic review and meta-analysis - Nature Human Behaviour
Vaccaro et al. present a systematic review and meta-analysis of the performance of human–AI combinations, finding that on average, human–AI combinations performed significantly worse than the best of…
buff.ly
December 25, 2024 at 11:10 AM