This is old, the contributions date from the early 60's, but it was still an interesting read. There was a bit more diversity of thought than I expected.
This is old, the contributions date from the early 60's, but it was still an interesting read. There was a bit more diversity of thought than I expected.
Enjoyed this more than the Lincoln Highway at any rate.
Enjoyed this more than the Lincoln Highway at any rate.
Honestly, I wouldn't recommend it. Probably too much detail, and I think Orlando Figes covers the malignancy and incompetence of this disastrous figure far better and more concisely in his 'A People's Tragedy'.
Honestly, I wouldn't recommend it. Probably too much detail, and I think Orlando Figes covers the malignancy and incompetence of this disastrous figure far better and more concisely in his 'A People's Tragedy'.
theamericanscholar.org/under-a-spel...
theamericanscholar.org/under-a-spel...
The book is quite comprehensive, but I think it is a little bottom heavy. The later period is covered more briefly.
The book is quite comprehensive, but I think it is a little bottom heavy. The later period is covered more briefly.
This also reminds me about how much more I need to read about the French Revolution, and how woefully lacking English language historiography is on the subject.
This also reminds me about how much more I need to read about the French Revolution, and how woefully lacking English language historiography is on the subject.
This one wasn't too interesting. Marginal figure in the greater scheme of things.
This one wasn't too interesting. Marginal figure in the greater scheme of things.
Chatter for the sake of chatter. We're all guilty of that to some extent.
Chatter for the sake of chatter. We're all guilty of that to some extent.
Same shit as always. Posture radical while lining up behind progressive liberals. Been that way for nearly 100 years now.
Same shit as always. Posture radical while lining up behind progressive liberals. Been that way for nearly 100 years now.
The question is why? Apparently she worries about offending anti-zionists, even though they unconditionally vote Dem anyway. So what's the point?
The question is why? Apparently she worries about offending anti-zionists, even though they unconditionally vote Dem anyway. So what's the point?
This is an absurdity given that Hamas is presently the institution through which national liberation finds expression.
There is no abstract will of the people that preexists its concrete embodiment.
This is an absurdity given that Hamas is presently the institution through which national liberation finds expression.
There is no abstract will of the people that preexists its concrete embodiment.