LightNews LightNews
banner
galigarza01.bsky.social
@galigarza01.bsky.social
8 followers 9 following 2 posts
Posts Replies Media Videos
galigarza01.bsky.social
I hope who ever voted for him, still stands by him whenever another disaster happens and there’s so help from the government.
nytimes.com The New York Times @nytimes.com · Jan 24
President Trump said while visiting flood victims of Hurricane Helene in North Carolina that he may recommend “FEMA go away,” after suggesting states should manage disaster responses. He does not have the authority to shutter the agency, which would require congressional action.
Trump says states should manage disasters and weighs shuttering FEMA.
www.nytimes.com
January 24, 2025 at 9:22 PM
Reposted
nytimes.com
President Trump said while visiting flood victims of Hurricane Helene in North Carolina that he may recommend “FEMA go away,” after suggesting states should manage disaster responses. He does not have the authority to shutter the agency, which would require congressional action.
Trump says states should manage disasters and weighs shuttering FEMA.
www.nytimes.com
January 24, 2025 at 7:40 PM
galigarza01.bsky.social
Thats whom they voted for and it’s disgusting
esqueer.net Alejandra Caraballo @esqueer.net · Jan 24
Getting rid of FEMA would absolutely devastate red states with climate change getting worse. It won't be the liberal enclaves being economically destroyed.
The image shows a map of the United States with a focus on projected climate damages as a percentage of GDP from 2040 to 2060. The map is color-coded, with darker shades of orange and red representing higher economic damages, particularly in the Gulf Coast and Southeastern U.S. Key points are marked: A indicates Houston, Texas, where significant damage is expected due to storms, sea-level rise, and heat-related deaths. B represents Miami, Florida, another major city expected to face high economic losses driven by similar factors. C highlights Gulf County, Florida, a rural area that could lose up to half its economy due to climate impacts. The accompanying text describes how wealthier urban areas like Houston and Miami will see losses in billions of dollars, while rural areas might experience proportionally greater economic devastation.
January 24, 2025 at 9:19 PM
Reposted
esqueer.net
Getting rid of FEMA would absolutely devastate red states with climate change getting worse. It won't be the liberal enclaves being economically destroyed.
The image shows a map of the United States with a focus on projected climate damages as a percentage of GDP from 2040 to 2060. The map is color-coded, with darker shades of orange and red representing higher economic damages, particularly in the Gulf Coast and Southeastern U.S. Key points are marked: A indicates Houston, Texas, where significant damage is expected due to storms, sea-level rise, and heat-related deaths. B represents Miami, Florida, another major city expected to face high economic losses driven by similar factors. C highlights Gulf County, Florida, a rural area that could lose up to half its economy due to climate impacts. The accompanying text describes how wealthier urban areas like Houston and Miami will see losses in billions of dollars, while rural areas might experience proportionally greater economic devastation.
January 24, 2025 at 7:58 PM
Reposted
9grave.bsky.social
Something was still missing🫢 Bye twitter, hi bluesky😍
November 18, 2024 at 2:42 AM