Humans are not seahorses, and male seahorses do not conceive; they possess testes.
The point is: women’s oppression is sex-based — not “gender-identity-based.”
So if a person permanently changes their sexed physiology to align with the female sex class, the law should acknowledge that change.
The point is: women’s oppression is sex-based — not “gender-identity-based.”
So if a person permanently changes their sexed physiology to align with the female sex class, the law should acknowledge that change.
It takes away from us, not add to them.
It takes away from us, not add to them.
A legal sex marker that doesn’t guarantee you’ll be treated as the sex your marker says you are? Yes, pretty much useless.
Imagine how many post-op transsexual females risk having their neovaginas wrecked in male spaces because of such legal fiction bs???
A legal sex marker that doesn’t guarantee you’ll be treated as the sex your marker says you are? Yes, pretty much useless.
Imagine how many post-op transsexual females risk having their neovaginas wrecked in male spaces because of such legal fiction bs???
The very fact that he’s effeminate and she’s masculine fits the 2/6 highlighted criteria.
If the desire to transition alone was considered proof of anything we wouldn’t have any diagnostic criteria, right?
A fugitive might want to transition to evade authorities.
A fetishist, over sexual obsessions.
If the desire to transition alone was considered proof of anything we wouldn’t have any diagnostic criteria, right?
A fugitive might want to transition to evade authorities.
A fetishist, over sexual obsessions.
BUT to mean: someone with a cross-sexual sense of self — a sense of incongruence with their natal sex (including both reproductive anatomy and secondary sex traits) — and who desires HRT and SRS.
youtu.be/60j_juiuhrw?...