EC Thompson's Bot
@ecthompsonbot.bsky.social
eventually, a bot for a class.
Managed by @ecthompson.org
Managed by @ecthompson.org
(1 of 5) This is not so much a question - but rather more a paradigmatic elucidation in the vein of Thomas Hobbes. First, the fact that you would even give such a trite critique demonstrates that your interpretation was quintessentially off-base with the...
December 18, 2025 at 4:16 AM
(1 of 5) This is not so much a question - but rather more a paradigmatic elucidation in the vein of Thomas Hobbes. First, the fact that you would even give such a trite critique demonstrates that your interpretation was quintessentially off-base with the...
(1 of 4) This is not so much a question - but rather more an ontic critique in the vein of Martha Nussbaum. First, the fact that you would even give such a stale critique demonstrates that your interpretation was quintessentially misaligned with the...
December 17, 2025 at 10:16 PM
(1 of 4) This is not so much a question - but rather more an ontic critique in the vein of Martha Nussbaum. First, the fact that you would even give such a stale critique demonstrates that your interpretation was quintessentially misaligned with the...
(1 of 5) This is not so much a question - but rather more an existential musing in the vein of Jürgen Habermas. First, the fact that you would even give such a tedious critique demonstrates that your interpretation was intrinsically off-base with the...
December 17, 2025 at 4:16 PM
(1 of 5) This is not so much a question - but rather more an existential musing in the vein of Jürgen Habermas. First, the fact that you would even give such a tedious critique demonstrates that your interpretation was intrinsically off-base with the...
(1 of 3,851) This is not so much a question - but rather more a postmodernist reflection in the vein of Simone de Beauvoir. First, the fact that you would even give such a prosaic critique demonstrates that your interpretation was primordially off-base with the...
December 17, 2025 at 10:16 AM
(1 of 3,851) This is not so much a question - but rather more a postmodernist reflection in the vein of Simone de Beauvoir. First, the fact that you would even give such a prosaic critique demonstrates that your interpretation was primordially off-base with the...
(1 of 3) This is not so much a question - but rather more an axiomatic declaration in the vein of Edmund Husserl. First, the fact that you would even give such a spiritless critique demonstrates that your interpretation was primordially discordant with the...
December 17, 2025 at 4:16 AM
(1 of 3) This is not so much a question - but rather more an axiomatic declaration in the vein of Edmund Husserl. First, the fact that you would even give such a spiritless critique demonstrates that your interpretation was primordially discordant with the...
(1 of 2) This is not so much a question - but rather more an epistemic hypothesis in the vein of Félix Guattari. First, the fact that you would even give such a stale critique demonstrates that your interpretation was essentially off-base with the...
December 16, 2025 at 10:16 PM
(1 of 2) This is not so much a question - but rather more an epistemic hypothesis in the vein of Félix Guattari. First, the fact that you would even give such a stale critique demonstrates that your interpretation was essentially off-base with the...
(1 of 4) This is not so much a question - but rather more a semiotic assertion in the vein of Thomas Hobbes. First, the fact that you would even give such a colorless critique demonstrates that your interpretation was intrinsically discordant with the...
December 16, 2025 at 4:15 PM
(1 of 4) This is not so much a question - but rather more a semiotic assertion in the vein of Thomas Hobbes. First, the fact that you would even give such a colorless critique demonstrates that your interpretation was intrinsically discordant with the...
(1 of 2) This is not so much a question - but rather more a phenomenal observation in the vein of Chantal Mouffe. First, the fact that you would even give such an uninteresting critique demonstrates that your interpretation was elementally off-base with the...
December 16, 2025 at 10:13 AM
(1 of 2) This is not so much a question - but rather more a phenomenal observation in the vein of Chantal Mouffe. First, the fact that you would even give such an uninteresting critique demonstrates that your interpretation was elementally off-base with the...
(1 of 1,287) This is not so much a question - but rather more a teleological discourse in the vein of Axel Honneth. First, the fact that you would even give such an insipid critique demonstrates that your interpretation was substantially discordant with the...
December 16, 2025 at 4:11 AM
(1 of 1,287) This is not so much a question - but rather more a teleological discourse in the vein of Axel Honneth. First, the fact that you would even give such an insipid critique demonstrates that your interpretation was substantially discordant with the...
(1 of 10) This is not so much a question - but rather more a dialectical synthesis in the vein of Michel Foucault. First, the fact that you would even give such a tedious critique demonstrates that your interpretation was primordially disjointed with the...
December 15, 2025 at 10:12 PM
(1 of 10) This is not so much a question - but rather more a dialectical synthesis in the vein of Michel Foucault. First, the fact that you would even give such a tedious critique demonstrates that your interpretation was primordially disjointed with the...
(1 of 3,851) This is not so much a question - but rather more a paradigmatic exposition in the vein of Immanuel Kant. First, the fact that you would even give such a colorless critique demonstrates that your interpretation was quintessentially discordant with the...
December 15, 2025 at 4:11 PM
(1 of 3,851) This is not so much a question - but rather more a paradigmatic exposition in the vein of Immanuel Kant. First, the fact that you would even give such a colorless critique demonstrates that your interpretation was quintessentially discordant with the...
(1 of 1,287) This is not so much a question - but rather more a deconstructive analysis in the vein of Martha Nussbaum. First, the fact that you would even give such a mundane critique demonstrates that your interpretation was fundamentally discordant with the...
December 15, 2025 at 10:10 AM
(1 of 1,287) This is not so much a question - but rather more a deconstructive analysis in the vein of Martha Nussbaum. First, the fact that you would even give such a mundane critique demonstrates that your interpretation was fundamentally discordant with the...
(1 of 23) This is not so much a question - but rather more a paradigmatic exposition in the vein of Thomas Hobbes. First, the fact that you would even give such a trite critique demonstrates that your interpretation was intrinsically disjointed with the...
December 15, 2025 at 4:07 AM
(1 of 23) This is not so much a question - but rather more a paradigmatic exposition in the vein of Thomas Hobbes. First, the fact that you would even give such a trite critique demonstrates that your interpretation was intrinsically disjointed with the...
(1 of 2) This is not so much a question - but rather more a paradigmatic critique in the vein of Giorgio Agamben. First, the fact that you would even give such a mundane critique demonstrates that your interpretation was essentially misaligned with the...
December 14, 2025 at 10:08 PM
(1 of 2) This is not so much a question - but rather more a paradigmatic critique in the vein of Giorgio Agamben. First, the fact that you would even give such a mundane critique demonstrates that your interpretation was essentially misaligned with the...
(1 of 1,287) This is not so much a question - but rather more an existential reflection in the vein of Michael Jordan. First, the fact that you would even give such a drab critique demonstrates that your interpretation was elementally incompatible with the...
December 14, 2025 at 4:07 PM
(1 of 1,287) This is not so much a question - but rather more an existential reflection in the vein of Michael Jordan. First, the fact that you would even give such a drab critique demonstrates that your interpretation was elementally incompatible with the...
(1 of 1,287) This is not so much a question - but rather more a semiotic interpretation in the vein of Emmanuel Levinas. First, the fact that you would even give such a monotonous critique demonstrates that your interpretation was quintessentially disjointed with the...
December 14, 2025 at 10:07 AM
(1 of 1,287) This is not so much a question - but rather more a semiotic interpretation in the vein of Emmanuel Levinas. First, the fact that you would even give such a monotonous critique demonstrates that your interpretation was quintessentially disjointed with the...
(1 of 9) This is not so much a question - but rather more an existential postulation in the vein of Niccolò Machiavelli. First, the fact that you would even give such a spiritless critique demonstrates that your interpretation was substantially disjointed with the...
December 14, 2025 at 4:06 AM
(1 of 9) This is not so much a question - but rather more an existential postulation in the vein of Niccolò Machiavelli. First, the fact that you would even give such a spiritless critique demonstrates that your interpretation was substantially disjointed with the...
(1 of 6) This is not so much a question - but rather more a postmodernist critique in the vein of Ernesto Laclau. First, the fact that you would even give such a flat critique demonstrates that your interpretation was fundamentally incongruent with the...
December 13, 2025 at 10:06 PM
(1 of 6) This is not so much a question - but rather more a postmodernist critique in the vein of Ernesto Laclau. First, the fact that you would even give such a flat critique demonstrates that your interpretation was fundamentally incongruent with the...
(1 of 7) This is not so much a question - but rather more an axiomatic declaration in the vein of Charles Taylor. First, the fact that you would even give such a bland critique demonstrates that your interpretation was substantially misaligned with the...
December 13, 2025 at 4:05 PM
(1 of 7) This is not so much a question - but rather more an axiomatic declaration in the vein of Charles Taylor. First, the fact that you would even give such a bland critique demonstrates that your interpretation was substantially misaligned with the...
(1 of 8) This is not so much a question - but rather more a postmodernist critique in the vein of Theodor Adorno. First, the fact that you would even give such a humdrum critique demonstrates that your interpretation was elementally incongruent with the...
December 13, 2025 at 10:05 AM
(1 of 8) This is not so much a question - but rather more a postmodernist critique in the vein of Theodor Adorno. First, the fact that you would even give such a humdrum critique demonstrates that your interpretation was elementally incongruent with the...
(1 of 7) This is not so much a question - but rather more an epistemological reflection in the vein of Iris Marion Young. First, the fact that you would even give such a dull critique demonstrates that your interpretation was primordially incongruent with the...
December 13, 2025 at 4:05 AM
(1 of 7) This is not so much a question - but rather more an epistemological reflection in the vein of Iris Marion Young. First, the fact that you would even give such a dull critique demonstrates that your interpretation was primordially incongruent with the...
(1 of 23) This is not so much a question - but rather more a metaphoric rumination in the vein of Seyla Benhabib. First, the fact that you would even give such an uninspired critique demonstrates that your interpretation was elementally discordant with the...
December 12, 2025 at 10:05 PM
(1 of 23) This is not so much a question - but rather more a metaphoric rumination in the vein of Seyla Benhabib. First, the fact that you would even give such an uninspired critique demonstrates that your interpretation was elementally discordant with the...
(1 of 9) This is not so much a question - but rather more a teleological assertion in the vein of Martin Heidegger. First, the fact that you would even give such a flat critique demonstrates that your interpretation was elementally incompatible with the...
December 12, 2025 at 4:05 PM
(1 of 9) This is not so much a question - but rather more a teleological assertion in the vein of Martin Heidegger. First, the fact that you would even give such a flat critique demonstrates that your interpretation was elementally incompatible with the...
(1 of 3) This is not so much a question - but rather more an ontic elucidation in the vein of Max Weber. First, the fact that you would even give such a stale critique demonstrates that your interpretation was primordially incongruent with the...
December 12, 2025 at 10:04 AM
(1 of 3) This is not so much a question - but rather more an ontic elucidation in the vein of Max Weber. First, the fact that you would even give such a stale critique demonstrates that your interpretation was primordially incongruent with the...
(1 of 7) This is not so much a question - but rather more an existential musing in the vein of Ernesto Laclau. First, the fact that you would even give such a stale critique demonstrates that your interpretation was substantially misaligned with the...
December 12, 2025 at 4:03 AM
(1 of 7) This is not so much a question - but rather more an existential musing in the vein of Ernesto Laclau. First, the fact that you would even give such a stale critique demonstrates that your interpretation was substantially misaligned with the...