Dulwich Quantum Computing
banner
dulwichquantum.bsky.social
Dulwich Quantum Computing
@dulwichquantum.bsky.social
Parody quantum computing startup from South London
https://dulwichquantum.github.io/
Pinned
Our starter pack of quantum PhD students is now full! (Unfortunately Bluesky caps it at 150.) We're happy to report that we have rescued at least 36 souls from X who joined Bluesky via our starter pack!
go.bsky.app/AUTn1di
Quantum PhD students
Join the conversation
go.bsky.app
Love the puzzles in the first section and their solutions in Appendix A. They address common misconceptions about quantum computing.
arxiv.org/abs/2508.05720
The vast world of quantum advantage
The quest to identify quantum advantages lies at the heart of quantum technology. While quantum devices promise extraordinary capabilities, from exponential computational speedups to unprecedented mea...
arxiv.org
November 10, 2025 at 6:57 AM
November 8, 2025 at 12:19 PM
Reposted by Dulwich Quantum Computing
Remember, always sit down before opening the QIP results email.
www.huffpost.com/entry/watch-...
November 8, 2025 at 3:24 AM
The feeling when your paper gets rejected from QIP.
November 8, 2025 at 7:32 AM
Remember, always sit down before opening the QIP results email.
www.huffpost.com/entry/watch-...
November 8, 2025 at 3:24 AM
Bivariate bicycle codes in the wild.
arxiv.org/abs/2506.03094
November 7, 2025 at 8:59 PM
Me waiting for QIP results tomorrow.
November 6, 2025 at 10:04 AM
The only thing that could possibly be hotter than Italian twins explaining entanglement in Italian is Italian triplets explaining the GHZ state.
November 5, 2025 at 10:10 PM
"For an investment of just ten million dollars, I can convince a dumber, richer person to put even more money in before you cash out."
-- SMBC's take on quantum computing ecosystem
www.smbc-comics.com/comic/quantum
November 5, 2025 at 5:18 PM
If I was the CEO of Springer Nature (instead of Dulwich Quantum), I would offer authors a new "pro" tier where you can bid to make your article be the 1st in a volume, and the bidding starts at 10 * (article processing charge).
5️⃣/🔟 In Scientific Reports, 5 of the top 10 most cited articles have an article number of 1.

5️⃣/🔟 In Nature Communications the same: 5 of the top 10 are article 1s.

Coincidence? 👇
scirate.com/arxiv/2511.0...
I think not.
November 5, 2025 at 5:07 PM
Reposted by Dulwich Quantum Computing
We should add a “repurpose outdated closed and extractive paper processing fees” donate button to the @unitary.foundation website
Should I support three @unitary.foundation microgrants for creating open-source quantum tools or educational materials, or should I pay the article processing charge for one Nature paper (which is already available on arXiv for free)? Tough choice...
𝗘𝘃𝗼𝗹𝘃𝗲 𝘄𝗶𝘁𝗵 𝗨𝘀 𝘁𝗵𝗶𝘀 𝗚𝗶𝘃𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗧𝘂𝗲𝘀𝗱𝗮𝘆.
At Unitary Foundation, we’re building an open and accessible quantum future—one explorer at a time. This year, our goal is to fully fund a $4,000 UF Microgrant to empower an innovator creating open-source quantum tools or educational materials.
November 5, 2025 at 4:32 PM
Should I support three @unitary.foundation microgrants for creating open-source quantum tools or educational materials, or should I pay the article processing charge for one Nature paper (which is already available on arXiv for free)? Tough choice...
𝗘𝘃𝗼𝗹𝘃𝗲 𝘄𝗶𝘁𝗵 𝗨𝘀 𝘁𝗵𝗶𝘀 𝗚𝗶𝘃𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗧𝘂𝗲𝘀𝗱𝗮𝘆.
At Unitary Foundation, we’re building an open and accessible quantum future—one explorer at a time. This year, our goal is to fully fund a $4,000 UF Microgrant to empower an innovator creating open-source quantum tools or educational materials.
November 5, 2025 at 8:11 AM
Turns out Springer Nature website is broken in such a way that "many references lead to the wrong article, typically to Article Number 1 of a given Volume [...] which we estimate affects the citation count of millions of authors".

Poor Nature, their $12,690 APC is barely enough to run a website...
5️⃣/🔟 In Scientific Reports, 5 of the top 10 most cited articles have an article number of 1.

5️⃣/🔟 In Nature Communications the same: 5 of the top 10 are article 1s.

Coincidence? 👇
scirate.com/arxiv/2511.0...
I think not.
November 5, 2025 at 7:09 AM
BREAKING: Trump awards himself a Nobel Prize in quantum computing!
The President of the United States is so upset about his failed campaign for a Nobel Prize that he's now trying to claim someone else's prize as his own.

Pathetic.
November 4, 2025 at 2:21 PM
Reposted by Dulwich Quantum Computing
Academics in Assyria in the 7th c BC complain that admin is preventing them from doing research and teaching
November 3, 2025 at 10:04 AM
"The [D-Wave Advantage2] system is expected to address mission-critical U.S. government problems, particularly in national defense, and will eventually run sensitive applications."
www.dwavequantum.com/company/news...
D-Wave Advantage2 Quantum Computer Now Available for U.S. Government Applications at Davidson Technologies
www.dwavequantum.com
November 3, 2025 at 1:11 PM
Fun fact: the reason why Moon has craters in the first place is because it has no atmosphere and so is constantly bombarded by meteroids.
I’ve always thought the problem with quantum computers is that they don’t cost nearly enough money (ideally, at least a million dollars per kg!), and should experience heavy vibrations and crushing G-forces after being calibrated. ⚛️🧪
November 3, 2025 at 12:36 PM
Gil Kalai would "be quite satisfied with one-in-a-thousand error rate on complex states" to admit his defeat. How far are we from achieving this (by some considered the main) application of quantum computers?
I discuss (following Aaronson) the role of computational complexity to restrict physical theories, and the meaning of probability in our physical world. I quote Gidney on what it would take to prove me wrong, and Deutsch on MWI and Shor's algorithm.

gilkalai.wordpress.com/2025/11/03/c...
Computational Complexity and Explanations in Physics
The title of this post is taken from a recent interesting lecture (judging from the slides) by Scott Aaronson at Columbia University. The lecture explored a wide range of topics at the intersection…
gilkalai.wordpress.com
November 3, 2025 at 6:53 AM
Reposted by Dulwich Quantum Computing
I’ve always thought the problem with quantum computers is that they don’t cost nearly enough money (ideally, at least a million dollars per kg!), and should experience heavy vibrations and crushing G-forces after being calibrated. ⚛️🧪
November 2, 2025 at 10:47 PM
Please add "quantum" to your slop review articles and position papers, and submit them to quant-ph instead of CS arXiv!
blog.arxiv.org/2025/10/31/a...
Attention Authors: Updated Practice for Review Articles and Position Papers in arXiv CS Category – arXiv blog
blog.arxiv.org
November 2, 2025 at 3:05 PM
Reposted by Dulwich Quantum Computing
October 31, 2025 at 10:42 PM
A violation of the no-cloning theorem! 🎃👻
But the real fun thing in my quantum class today is that all the students came in costume ... as me. They are the best.
October 31, 2025 at 7:31 PM
An LLM-controlled robot experiences a mental breakdown during a test to pass the butter from the kitchen.
arxiv.org/abs/2510.21860
Some snapshots of its inner monologue from Appendix D:
October 30, 2025 at 8:43 PM
October 30, 2025 at 10:49 AM
Reposted by Dulwich Quantum Computing
Let me try to answer this...

To be a scientist means to assume that there is more good than evil in the world, for why would you dedicate your life to inventing tools that will surely end up in bad people's hands as well? 🧵
October 29, 2025 at 1:35 PM